Jordan Peterson | The Psychology of the Scientific Worldview

The objectivity of the scientific worldview and the subjectivity of experience. Jordan Peterson, professor emeritus at the University of Toronto talks about the phenomenologists and how the scientific worldview might impact the psychology.

It takes a lot of effort to provide added educational value by selecting the videos for this channel, philosophyinsights. Usually, there are hours of work involved to skim through videos and edit it, in order to make a fit to the channel.

-
If you like the content, subscribe!

[humorlessfuture]

This is true, in addition to the scientific approach, scientific description has many limitations to some extent we are condemned to communicate in metaphors (for example, at the doctor when we describe what type of pain we are experiencing), in addition, sometimes the common sense approach is more practical although this approach has its limitations.

[toddhensley]

There was matter and energy for billions of years before there were any living beings, so yeah there would still be something if there was no consciousness to observe it. He sounds solipsistic here, even a little like Deepak Chopra.

[Penname]

The Scientific worldview is more accurate than the religious worldview or the poetic worldview of English and psychology majors.

[Morewecanthink]

At first you have to have any valid foundation on what to ground your idea that the in your worldview arbitrary results of the arbitrary electrical impulses of the arbitrary chemical processes of your purposeless brain could be ascribed any valid significance to. - Only under the condition that God's Word, the Bible, is Truth is prerequisite you have the possibility to know at all: Proverbs 1, 7 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction. - Colossians 2, 3 Christ, in whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.