Proof that f(x) = 1/x is Continuous on (0, infinity) using Delta-Epsilon

preview_player
Показать описание
Proof that f(x) = 1/x is Continuous on (0, infinity) using Delta-Epsilon
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Wow this series is a goldmine for my analysis course, thank you so much!

tristanthepterodactyl
Автор

at 06:43 The reverse triangle inequality is |x - y| >= ||x| - |y|| . how does |x_0 + (x - x_0)| >= |x_0| - |x - x_0| match that pattern?

ElizaberthUndEugen
Автор

I believe a proof should consider both values of delta
separately dependent on their relative values.

The scratchwork seems to use the two delta values
simultaneously and it does not need to!

TheCliveAC
Автор

How is it proved for any x in the interval if you have only proved the continuity for the arbitrarily chosen interval xo +/- xo/2? why didn't you choose a different interval?

seansethi
Автор

4:18 is it okay to just bound it abs(x-x0)/xx0 < abs(x-x0)/1? since denominator for 1 is bigger than any number of xx0?

gjsksn
Автор

How does this change if you are proving continuity from (-infinity, 0). Obviously the part of choosing the delta is going to change, but it would then affect the min case... as x_0/2 will always be less than x_0^2 is x_0<0.

erik
Автор

I have seen epsilon delta proofs for other functions too, but I haven't understood the reason behind taking minimum ...?

comkunal
Автор

Why does delta need to be the minimum of the two values that we found?

joshuapereira
Автор

Why do you use one value for delta and then a different one later in the proof?

lmatton
Автор

Thanks . Now i know why delta is minimum of those two.

amarparajuli
Автор

Hey I have a question please: how could this video show uniform continuity of 1/x for (0, infinity), ( which includes (0, 1) ), yet in another video you say 1/x is not uniformly continuous for (0, 1). I’m so confused!

MathCuriousity
Автор

This video is really helpful. Thank you so much!

蔺美云
Автор

Is there a difference between prooving uniform continuity and continuity on an interval? ( they mean the same thing right?)

melodieeluafi
Автор

Why exactly did you choose x0/2 and not x0/4? Is there any specific reason for that?

bushranaheed
Автор

Is it ok if I choose another interval? Let's say that I want to choose the interval (x_0, 3x_0) which is centered at 2x_0, and then I find 1/x to be smaller then 1/x_0, therefore I found delta to be any real number less than epsilon*x_0*x_0? Is this ok?

raducumihaicristian
Автор

What does delta and epsilon mean/define in limit sense

zzgiantdwarf
Автор

Why do you have to choose between two deltas? I don't understand why you defined the first delta, the second is just fine to me.

MrCentrax
Автор

hi, how come you chose both of the different deltas to be the minimum in the different equations in the proof?

kapi
Автор

Thank you; this proof is not intuitive at first glance.

TN-pjlk
Автор

I think there is a better proof for the claim that lim 1/x (x —> c) = 1/c for all 0 < c. If 0 < δ & 0 < x & -δ < x – c < δ, then c – δ < x < c + δ. Hence, if you can find δ such that δ < c, then 0 < c – δ, and 1/x < 1/(c – δ, thus 1/(c·x) = 1/|c·x| < 1/[c·(c – δ)], and |x – c|/|c·x| = |1/x – 1/c| < |x – c|/[c·(c – δ)] < δ/[c·(c – δ)]. Therefore, |1/x – 1/c| < δ/[c·(c – δ)]. To prove |1/x – 1/c| < ε, let ε = δ/[c·(c – δ)], equivalent to δ = c^2·ε/(1 + c·ε). Thus, all that remains to be proven is that c^2·ε/(1 + c·ε) < c, in accordance to δ < c, and the proof is complete. c^2·ε/(1 + c·ε) < c is equivalent to c·ε/(1 + c·ε) < 1, equivalent to c·ε < 1 + cε, equivalent to 0 < 1, which is axiomatic. Q. E. D.

angelmendez-rivera