Frank Turek and His World of Lies

preview_player
Показать описание
COMING SOON to a theater near you!

A new comedy from the team that brought you ‘Liar Liar’!

Frank Turek was climbing the ladder of success. One lie at a time. Until one day his son tried to make an honest man out of him.

It didn’t work.

Frank has crazy notions about what an atheist is, applying objects with no agency the same cognitive capacity as a person. He makes the claim there are no other planets with exactly the kind or parameters to support the kind of life we know, without knowing how many planets exist and if they could or couldn’t support life.

He says there is more evidence against macroevolution than for macroevolution, despite multiple lines of evidence that has been gathered over the course of the last 150 years that prove it.
Rated D for Dumb.

Original videos:

Sources:

SUPPORT | TWEET | SNAIL EMAIL

Thank you so much for your continued support on the interwebs!

As defined in the Australian Copyright Act 1968 (as amended) Division 3 Section 41A states: “A fair dealing with a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work, or with an adaptation of a literary, dramatic or musical work, does not constitute an infringement of the copyright in the work if it is for the purpose of parody or satire.”

Copyright material can be used for the purposes of parody and satire without permission, provided your use is fair. The terms “parody” and “satire” are not defined in the Copyright Act and have not yet been considered by Australian courts, but it is likely that a court would look at dictionary definitions of the words to decide what they mean in the context of the Act.

People can use copyright material for the purpose of criticism or review without infringing copyright, provided they acknowledge the author and title of the work, and provided the dealing is “fair”.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I sent out many invitations to Turek and many others to put together a stream with a panel of believers and unbelievers. I couldn't get any answers either.

GodlessGranny
Автор

I'm glad I'm starting to forget what existential crisis I've been in when I started losing my faith. Frank Turek exhibits all the signs of him preventing such a thing from happening. I think he's prepared to die before admitting he could be wrong or simply that he doesn't know. And of course his income depends on repeating what he's saying now.

DutchJoan
Автор

That end clip, he is very persuasive about why Hell is the better place!

PurpleRhymesWithOrange
Автор

So we see where you stand on the 'rocks are atheists' debate.

PurpleRhymesWithOrange
Автор

Enjoy them while they last since there will be no fuzzy smiling bears or rainbows in hell.

peters
Автор

Nice approach Frank. Just make shit up as you go along. Someone will believe you.

MeltingPotRock
Автор

"God loves you too much to force you into his presence... "
Does this idiot even know what he is saying?
So saying "be with me or be punished forever" is not forcing?

So putting a knife to someone's throat and forcing them have sex with you is not 'forcing ' them either as they do have the choice to refuse?

Yes, they will be dead (which is arguably at least less bad then being tortured FOREVER! ) but still having a 'loving' choice according to this guy.

Love this video
Mr.Bear rules

robertx
Автор

Turek is like a child who keeps asking why? Good on him. But eventually why ends up in an infinite regress. So Turek replaces it with God. Take Turek's argument that we need God to have a concept of absolute morality. It is true, morality is necessary. But it is more than sufficient that evolution gave humans cooperation (and competition) as well as Theory of Mind and mirror neurons, which give us endogenetic morality which works reasonably well when it works and which even theists employ without realizing it. Having a concept of "absolute" morality does not add anything extra that makes us behave any better above and beyond the necessary and sufficient morality that evolution gave us. Turek likes to bamboozle people however with his infinite regress questions. He might as well ask why is water wet? Not even physicists can answer that question and they have determined that a minimum of 7 molecules of H2O is needed before H2O becomes water. It is sufficient that we know water is liquid and can be used to drink, to wash, be used as a solvent and to swim in among other things. (Turek: "But why?" LOL)

robdielenberg
Автор

Hey I was wondering it’s about joe from the Cleveland street preachers somebody said how do you know heaven and hell is real joe said because Jesus Rose from the dead then someone said how do you know that joe said we have the documents then he said what documents joe said the New Testament then joe said there were 500 witnesses then someone said did you see it then joe said did you see George Washington in office then that person stayed silence can you plz respond oh and can you plz plz plz plz react to Gabe the street preacher he’s just like joe

thejollyjayguy