Existentialism Explained

preview_player
Показать описание
A broad yet popular Philosophy in Europe throughout the 20th Century, Existentialism is a philosophy that is focused on the individual, it holds that we are all free and our choices are what shape our essence. Watch as George and John explain.

This video was an extract.

Check out the Philosophy Vibe “Existentialism” eBook, available on Amazon:

#Existentialism #philosophy
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

For the best introduction to philosophy check out the Philosophy Vibe Anthology set, available worldwide on Amazon:

Volume 1 - Philosophy of Religion

Volume 2 - Metaphysics

Volume 3 - Ethics and Political Philosophy

PhilosophyVibe
Автор

Existentialism is both appealing as well as depressing

thephilosophermma
Автор

Explained it great bro. This helped A LOT. Thanks

evanthatkid
Автор

Good elucidation. Unfortunately long before we find our “own feet” we are programmed by our parents, teachers, cultural expectations and values, and it is only when we become more critical and are willing to break lose from indoctrination, especially religious, that we can travel along the path of establishing our identities (essence).

kantimakan
Автор

Make a video on objectivism the philosophy of Ayn

venomverse
Автор

Thankyouu Bro, you've explained it well and smooth😎

Secret
Автор

Is essentialism the main difference between Husserlian transcendental phenomenology and (Sartrean) existential phenomenology? From what I remember of Ideas I, Husserl tries to uncover essential structures of human consciousness, such as the relations between the subject and objects of consciousness relations. It seems like Sartre would reject such essentialism, no? Would Heidegger? Or would Heidegger's exploration of Being itself constitute an essentialist project?

SolomonGrundy
Автор

So. essence is the same as perception

DennnisB
Автор

Isn't that only Sartre's philosophy?

einzelwolf
Автор

The problem I have with "essence" is how far down the rabbit hole do we go in defining "essence". In the chair analogy, there is the general description of the attributes that define a chair, but then one can bring into play the "essence" of an antique chair, or a modern chair, or a sofa. Do such variations hold any philosophical significance ?
A person can reasonably be considered to have their own innate "essence" that makes them who they are but on what basis can one say that the essence "preceded" that person? A human is "...born with their essence already programmed..." is a bit suggestive of external factors (perhaps like a God?) doing the programming. I prefer to phrase it by saying that the "essence" of an individual is the sum total of the of all the interactions of genetic and environmental factors throughout the ages.
Either way, the individual has to be in existence in order for their "essence" to exist. Any subscription to the belief that "essence" "precedes" the existence of an individual leads almost inevitably to a religious (or theological) argument. Perhaps "essence" can be equated to a theological "soul" if it precedes the existence of an individual?
I'd be interested in any comments on the above.

df
Автор

Genetics belies existentialism. Every man is born with certain physical and mental characteristics.

anirbansadhukhan
Автор

The mere prospect or thought of existentialism reveals such a solitary, or empty approach to life’s universal meaning

yag
Автор

I was reading existensialism and humanism..i got so depressed i stopped reading ..thanks for the video btw

adnannahian
Автор

In short, Existentialism Precedes Essence (I got i!)

Secret
Автор

I need cartoons because I am a moron..

sophiafake-virus