Before You Start On Quantum Mechanics, Learn This

preview_player
Показать описание

You can't derive quantum mechanics from classical laws like F = ma, but there are close parallels between many classical and quantum equations. Many fundamental quantum equations are expressed as a commutator of operators, such as the canonical commutation relation and the Heisenberg equation of motion. These equations have classical parallels where the quantum commutator is replaced by a classical operation called the Poisson bracket, up to a factor of i hbar. I'll show how Poisson brackets work, and how they mirror these key quantum equations.

About physics mini lessons:
In these intermediate-level physics lessons, I'll try to give you a self-contained introduction to some fascinating physics topics. If you're just getting started on your physics journey, you might not understand every single detail in every video---that's totally fine! What I'm really hoping is that you'll be inspired to go off and keep learning more on your own.

About me:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Your videos are crystal-clear, beautifully laid out and follow a precise progression, treating not so easy topics that are usually not well understood or explained with a lot of confusion.
I think your videos are among the very top quality materials on physics divulgation, and I'm sure that more and more people will join. Keep up the excellent work! <3

pianophiliarmonic
Автор

I remember finding this connection between QM and CM really intriguing when I first learned it, but I'm also a bit sad that I've never learned a deeper reason for why the "replace Poisson brackets with commutators" rule makes sense. Do you know of any deeper algebraic or physical reason why this connection exists?

eigenchris
Автор

Again very good. Yes I would appreciate to see Noethers Theorem worked out in Hamiltonian formalism.

bartpastoor
Автор

i love how your able to stay focused to the topic at hand to avoiding long tangents. It makes the videos so much easier to digest.

shutupimlearning
Автор

The quality and level of the videos is just too good and provide much insight.
They seduce you to pick up a pen and paper to do the calculations yourself.
I could not resist and am proud to have become one of your patreons just now.
Keep up the good work!

bartpastoor
Автор

This is where the concept of spin (a form of angular momentum) gets weird as it has no classical counterpart that you can relate it to😍. I love physics.

musamoloi
Автор

As someone who is going to take QM in my next semester, thanks for the help! Thankfully we covered a lot of what you said in CM, but the video is a cool summary and refresher on the topic. Especially necessary when you have so many other subjects too.

nagygergely
Автор

My classical mechanics course glossed over hamiltonian mechanics, but your video was still very clear. Gonna go read up on hamiltonian mechanics now

volcanic
Автор

PLEASE EXPLAIN. You have no idea how much researching I have done just to understand quantum mechanics. You are an absolute genius science educator. Keep up the good work man!!!!

WildGamez
Автор

Wow, criminally underrated. I had to stop and absorb some of the mathematics at times because it moved so fast, but I understood everything.
I really feel like my understanding of math and physics is leveling up.

APaleDot
Автор

Yes, please do the more advanced explanation. If you have any experience with Bessel functions, I would like to see something on that. Really enjoy these videos!

erichaag
Автор

From a mathematical perspective the commutator is famous in the context of Lie Algebras, an example of which is first order differential operators. Who knew that math was useful in physics?

orangeguy
Автор

As I'm going through my physics degree, this video is helping me a lot to better understand my classical dynamics course, thank you very much for these videos, I will follow up on your very useful video uploads.

TheFreckCo
Автор

Coming back to this video after learning a little more Hamiltonian mechanics, the Poisson bracket being 1 is the exact same as the condition for a coordinate transform to be canonical - that is, for the Jacobian of the transform M, and the canonical symplectic matrix J (as in, the one that spins everything 90 degrees anticlockwise), the Poisson bracket comes out of the condition that MJM^T = J. And this essentially comes from restricting your coordinate transforms to only the ones where Hamilton's equations of motion are satisfied (i.e. if you have some old coordinates q, p and some new coord.s Q, P, then \del H / \del Q = dP/dt and \del H / \del P = -dQ/dt).

In short: the Poisson bracket is basically the condition for a change of coordinates that allows the same Hamiltonian to describe what's going on in the new phase space.

EDIT: correcting one of the Hamiltonian EoMs.

Eta_Carinae__
Автор

Ya boi literally explained this in what took two weeks of lectures from my graduate classical mechanics professor. Very nice!

mgvlddu
Автор

Definitely interested in the Hamiltonian version of Noether's theorem.

rlativ
Автор

Men this videos are a jewel. You have a knack for explaining physics and it's clear that you put the effort into understanding the concepts and a lot of effort into this videos. Thanks for sharing. I hope the channel grows.

jaimeduncan
Автор

This is really amazing,
Watching your videos is really beneficial for students who wants to explore the theories,

Really great work 👏👏🙏🏻

vivekpanchal
Автор

Thank you!
very helpful on such an abstract topic.

Mysoi
Автор

From Vietnam with love, thank you so much for clear and easy-to-understand video.

lengocchinh