Macroevolution Objection to New Life Forms Design (Teleological) Argument For God | Logical Faith 9

Full Video: First Life Design (Teleological) Argument For God | Logical Faith Part 8

Teleological Argument: (1) Every design had a designer; (2) The universe has highly complex design; (3) Therefore, the universe had a Designer.

References: Geisler, Norman L., and Frank Turek. I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist, CROSSWAY BOOKS, 2004.

Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.

Please contact me if you have any valid copyright issue with my video and would like for it to be taken down.

[MrFossilabgfyth]

Evolution and natural selection can be a process that is guided by natural processes with no plan. It has no plan for it is a natural process, natural process don't have a mind. But God does have a mind. Therefore, God can have a plan. God can work through these processes and guide them to a particular goal.

[---hzvi]

How does the fossil record factor into this ? Do they not show more significant changes because of their age ?

[Demonoicgamer]

I’m gonna crush the intelligent design argument with a simple question. If everything requires a designer who designed god? You can’t say he’s eternal because you’d be going against the very argument you are using.