Avoid this Mistake Using The CBT Civil PE Reference Manual | PE Exam Review

preview_player
Показать описание
The Civil PE Exam has switched to 100% Computer Based Testing (CBT) for the civil professional engineering exams. Watch out for these mistakes using the civil PE reference manual

👇 SUBSCRIBE TO KESTÄVÄ ENGINEERING’S YOUTUBE CHANNEL 👇

Connect with me on LinkedIn 👇

Civil PE and SE exam will be here before you know it!
(Check NCEES website to confirm time, date, and location!!)

NCEES Website 👇

Brave Browser 👇
(I am not affiliated or receive compensation from Brave)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Disclaimers: Richard Racz, P.E. does not hold the title "structural engineer". Any claim of it in the videos or descriptions is unintentional and is superseded by the title "civil engineer" in the states of MA and OR.

The Kestävä YouTube page is intended for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in, or provided through, this YouTube page is intended to constitute advice, or to serve as a substitute for the advice of an engineering professional. Any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk.

Under no circumstances will Kestävä be responsible or liable in any way for any content, including but not limited to, any errors or omissions in the content, or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of any content communicated on this YouTube page.

#NCEES #civilengineering #PEexam
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

You can also use superposition i.e. take the value of (5/8)wl which is given in the reference book for R2 and multiply it by 2 to account for the adjacent span, which is basically the same formula you showed.

Zs
Автор

I think the formula comes from ACI- SP-4 Table 7.1 p 7-5 ; but honestly can just use the 3 span formula with load across only 2 of the spans: Continous Beam - Three Equal Spans - One End Span Unloaded (this is in the civil reference manual and aisc (diagram 37)). It is so similar to the real 2 span one doesn't matter on test . 3 span = 1.20wL while 2 span = 1.25wl .

The correct way to do it though using the AISC: TABLE 3-22C (CONTINUOUS BEAMS MOMENTS AND SHEAR COEFFICIENTS): You will see a equal span equally loaded uniform load table. You will notice a "number" "arrow up" "number" divided by a "number" in the shear visual part under the reactions. These are the shears at the reaction points (they can be different positive and negative directions). To get total reaction at that point you should be adding these shear numbers up then dividing by the number under it then multiplying vs wL. L should not be the total length of continuous beam, only the span.

For example (using ^ as up arrow): 4 span beam has 17^15 /(28) from the table. Negative shear = 17/28 * w * L (span only) which matches the diagrams in table 3-23 btw. The positive shear at that point is also 15/28 * w * L. To get the reaction it is ((17+15) / 28) * w * L (span only).

For example in the video: It is "5" arrow up "5" divided by 8 in AISC TABLE 3-22C. ((5+5)/8) * w * L = correct answer. It just so happened the shears at the mid point are equivalent so multiplying by 2 for total length it just worked out, but in other situations it will get wrong answer.

Smoke-bqwx
Автор

My only problem with this question was the LRFD vs ASD. I automatically go for LRFD. Other than that I don’t really rely on that reference for any structural questions. It has almost nothing in it.
Anyway, thanks for the question!

raffiart
Автор

We could still use the PE reference manual by using supersposition, since it is symmetric. Just assume another udl on the right span

BhushanRaj
Автор

I spoke with NCEES in my state and they said depending on your depth is what you will be given for references. Structural and Construction. If you are Water, Geotechnical, or Transportation you will NOT have access to these resources and only the Design Standards provided by NCEES for that specific depth. I would email or chat with your state board to verify this as well just to get full clarification.

jeffreycastillo
Автор

Very helpful. I will say those continuous span tables like the tables from the steel manual are also in the PE reference manual.

Jzns
Автор

You can find Rb=1.25wl in ACI SP-4 Table 7.1

jeffreyyang
Автор

Excellent, I feel this way with geotech that some statistical factors are referenced somewhere else and you have to know them by memory or know how to get them somehow

Mastela
Автор

don't you need to multiply 5/8 by 2 for being equal shear on both side of the support?

bishalnayak
Автор

Thanks so much for pointing it out. I do not know really why they this kind of Manuel . They have elaborated slot on water section and geotechnical that what required in addition they have taken out the import part of construction and structures . What is your opinion?

LEARNPROJECTMANAGEMENT
Автор

AISC is provided on the exam so all of the beam equations are there...

jefe
Автор

Thank you for sharing good explanation! can you share some examples for Geotechnical depth foundation design?

KIRANPATEL-vngk
Автор

I assume that the PE reference manual thought you would use superposition for the load case where one span has weight and the other doesn't. By using superposition you would get an R2 of 5/4*w*L where w is as calculated and L is 5 ft giving the same answer.

aadrienthayaparan
Автор

Thanks. However, I don't see any equation for continuous beam - Two equal spans - distributed load in AISC. The 5wl/8 is for when the load is on only one span!

benjaminisation
Автор

started seeing discrepancies in my old paper/pen notes for water and the ncees hb 1.1. there are items which are missing in ncees hb 1.1. i think that this is fine AS LONG AS you make the hb 1.1 your bible and know what IS in it and what is NOT. study it assiduously. you cannot be allowed to become surprised, to be knocked off your feet during a time which is naturally already stressful. make it your best friend by practicing w it constantly. good luck!

oleopathic
Автор

Result is correct, but I believe L=5, then it has to be multiplied by 2. Refer to 39 on Table 3-23 on AISC 15th edition (RB=1.1wl= 0.500wl+0.600wl). Hope someone can confirm. Amazing content btw!

AlonsoGuzman-qb
Автор

Was their intent with not including that diagram to see if you know how to use superposition?

gregsharpe
Автор

I'm not finding the diagram for 2 span with a uniform load all the way across in the steel manual either.

christianenelson
Автор

Where do I find the LRFD load cases? I usually use AASHTO LRFD Table 3.4.1-1

mcanillas
Автор

You need to disturb the loads triangle and trapezoidal

moeadel