Galactic Empire Vs The CIS #starwars #mandalorian #yputubeshorts #clonewars #edit #darthvader

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The CIS had more numbers. By the end of the clone wars the droid army was numbered in the quintillions which was more than any population of sentient beings in the galaxy.

doomsterr
Автор

"FOR THE SEPERATIST ALLIANCE" VS "FOR THE EMPIRE"

mrFLightningIV
Автор

Bro "FOR THE SEPARATIST ALLIANCE" hits hard💀

hyplite
Автор

Lmao for leaders bro really said “though it’s a close one, I think Palpatine beats Palpatine in this one.”

georgebell
Автор

Super weapons should go to CIS, because it was them, who created the plan for death star. Not to mention they have more plans to create superweapons, but couldn't follow through it, cause Palpatine held them back.

anshunath
Автор

" FOR THE SEPERATIST ALLIANCE " Hit differant fr.

Blackness_
Автор

"10000 systems rely on us!!"

Grand_Principality_of_nunindae
Автор

For the Separatist Alliance 🫡. Who's with me

thomashyde
Автор

"FOR THE SEPARTIST ALLIENCE!" Roger, roger

CIanker
Автор

Lemme debunk this.

The separatists far outnumbered the empire (this is logic just by looking at the factories on geonosis and elsewhere)

The empire on average didn't have better military leaders. Most star destroyer captains were incompetent and were hated by their troops. The only good leaders I can think of off the top of my head from the empire are Veers, Thrawn, and Vader. There were others but due to antagonization from tarkin (partially) many of them either ended up dead or left the empire.

The empire didn't have better starfighters at all. The TIE fighter was extremely cheap and easy to destroy. The vulture droid was far faster and more capable than a TIE fighter. The only argument you could make about the empire having a superior starfighter would be the TIE defender which wasn't implimented nearly enough to make a valid point.

I dont know much about imperial generals so you may be right. Veers was a great general. But if you base it off the comics than grievous was a genuinely good general (up for debate on who's better though)

Thrawn was a large exception when it came to imperial admirals. If you're talking about who had the singular best admiral than fine but if it's in general than thrawn doesn't make a huge difference. Even in the clone wars series which was heavily biased against the separatists, they still had incredible admirals (trench for example)

Infantry is debatable based on what you define as infantry. For example is infantry just tue b1 battle droids or does it count for the b2 battle droid and all its varients? Because b2 battle droids are extremely strong and durable, not to mention the heavy assault varient that gives it a rocket launcher.

Special forces is just wrong. The separatists had droidekas that were basically invulnerable to blaster fire and you jeeded a rather technical method to destroy them (throwing a droid popper or thermal detonator is just the right way to get through its shield, sneak up behind it, or destroy it while it's rolling. Commando droids are fast and extremely tactical, likely moreso than most special forces in the empire. Magnaguards are self explanitory.

Ok now for the leader, its a bit odd to cover since palpatine played both the republic and separatists during the clone wars, but we're going to say that dooku lead the separatists since he mostly did. Dooku was overall a better leader than palpatine. Palpatine created a system in the empire that wasn't based on merit, but instead on loyalty. Dooku overall was very kind to most of his associates whether it be military commanders, parliament, or the separatist council, and he overall promoted freedom to all the worlds in separatist space.

I was gonna argue the part about the enforcers but that one is honestly right.

The superweapon arguement is tricky. The geonocians designed the death star, and they were separatists, but the empire built and controlled it, so it's somewhat debatable.

In the end the empire versus separatists is a debateable topic that can't really be solved just off of basic factors like who has more numbers or who has the biggest super weapon. I hope this has enlightened some that there isn't any certain way to tell who would win due to there being so many factors. Thank you all for reading (i know you skipped some), goodbye.

lordcardinals
Автор

Absolute cap, by the end of the clone wars, droid numbers were estimated in the quintillions, which is more than the empire had in civilian (CIVILIAN) members.
Same for any navy, ground or whatever vehicles, the CIS just had numbers you couldn't defeat.

And with no exaggerating, if the CIS didn't have sith leadership with a bigger plan, it would literally have been the greatest, most morally correct and most independent army in the entire history of the star wars galaxy.
Palpatine actually had to step in several times because the cis would've just crushed the republic with their new troops, numbers or tactics, which is the only reason why in everyone's eyes "they lost".

Otherwise they wouldn't have had any problem, and neither would they have had with the empire.

ju-b
Автор

"FOR THE SEPARATIST ALLIANCE!"

tofuyeahman
Автор

The Confederacy of Independent Systems (CIS) had a unique advantage in battle due to their use of droid armies. These droids were programmed to follow orders without question, making them ideal for executing complex tactics quickly and efficiently. On the other hand, the Galactic Empire relied heavily on human soldiers, who were less maneuverable and could be swayed by emotions like fear and doubt.

In addition, the CIS utilized a variety of different droids for different purposes, ranging from small, agile battle droids to massive, heavily armed droidekas. This allowed them to adapt to different battle situations and overcome tactics used by their opponents. The Rebel Alliance, which also relied heavily on guerrilla tactics, would have found it difficult to predict the CIS's tactics and react accordingly.

Furthermore, the CIS's ships were designed for more tactical maneuvering, rather than brute strength. The Providence-class cruisers, for example, were particularly effective at flanking maneuvers and surprise attacks. The Imperial navy, on the other hand, relied on larger, more heavily armed vessels, which meant they were less capable of quick, tactical maneuvers.

One example of the CIS's effectiveness in battle is the Battle of Ryloth, which was detailed in Star Wars: The Clone Wars. In this battle, a small CIS fleet successfully outmaneuvered a much larger Republic fleet by using unpredictable tactics and overwhelming firepower.

Overall, the CIS's use of droids and tactical flexibility gave them an advantage over both the Republic and the Rebel Alliance. While the Galactic Empire had access to larger, more powerful warships, they lacked the CIS's ability to quickly adapt to changing circumstances on the battlefield.

So in my opinion the C.I.S would have a a closer fight.

Earth_FAN_xX
Автор

I never thought adding Star Wars Battlefront 2 Quotes would make this such an orgasmic asmr.

RealObserving
Автор

“FOR THE SEPARATIST ALLIANCE!!” My favorite quote

Pickle_Style-
Автор

Numbers to the empire -_- the entire Droid army was about 10x bigger then the entire galaxy

isaac-ulxl
Автор

agreed. although the sheer amount of Droid starfighters might pose some difficulty in space superiority, the Empire is just built to outgun anything they come across

jnasvangelder
Автор

Number of Troops:
•Galactic Empire - 1.1 Billion
•Separatist Alliance - 2 Quintillion
Warships:
•Galactic Empire - 25, 100
•Separatist Alliance - 4 Million

FraychikenBustilla
Автор

Military leaders, generals and admirals is all debatable, especially if we are talking overall and not just who has the single best person.

bouncin
Автор

Considering Palpatine was holding the CIS back, I gotta give it to them here.

They needed to nerf themselves HARD for the Republic to win.

azzythechristianfurry