Why Time's observed passing: Alain Connes music noncommutative negentropy discrete frequency Yuan Qi

Commentary on this amazing Alain Connes lecture:
Connes:
"So this is like the piano, if you want, in which you can play, in both cases, because there are three different kinds of notes. But somehow I will call something a chord if there exists a point at which the corresponding eigenfunctions both don't vanish. OK? So and either it could be three [Perfect Fifth on the piano]. It turns out that the chord which is blue-red is not possible for shape two but it is for shape one....
If you want a new invariant it's intimately related to a point. And the point in that view which is spectral is given by correlations between the eigenvariables. So that the points, in fact, because after all if we want to say where we are, we not only have to give the space, the geometry, but we also have to specific the point where we are. ...an emission matrix of scalar products of spinors of the point where we are. You have eigenspinors and you look at the corresponding matrix and that would be exactly what you need to look at the point. "
"I believe that the true variability is quantum and that the true variability is exactly the fact that when you take a quantum observable it doesn't have a single value. That is has many possible values which are given by the spectrum of the operator. And that belief, once you have found this, plus the fact that the discrete variables can not coexist with the continuous variables without the quantum formalism... How can the times that we know a match from this considerations, and in a very strange manner, it will be related to the end of the talk.. I know it's difficult but in my mind it's backed up by an intuition that's come from many years of work and this is very difficult to transmit. So I will try...
We are wrong to try to write things in time. Because of our minds, which are logical, we always trying to reconstitute a logical past... Just because we want to feel happy about it. What I'm saying is that things might be different and that there could be a fundamental quantum variability... "
based on this 1997 of slides pdf
As transcribed and analyzed at
With the addition of Olivier Costa de Beauregard on paranormal negentropy and qigong master Effie P. Chow on different frequencies and different times experienced together...
Connes:
"My feeling is that the passing of the time could very well come from the fact that we UNable to know all observables in the quantum mechanics.... we are unable to control all the observables of the universe. We are only able to control a small part of them which is a factorization of this kind. And because of our lack of knowledge of the full observables, we have the feeling that time is passing.
[Space]Time is emergent and a corollary of our lack of knowledge.... There is a relation between thermodynamics and the Big Bang..."
Out of this problem, which is a purely mathematical problem, ...von Neumann classified factors, Type I to III, then came the time evolution...and the uniqueness of the time evolution which completely, you weren't allowed to classified factors... So the idea then is the following: parameter T, there is one parameter group of things which ... On the other hand if you take very seriously the idea that the origin of variability doesn't come from the passing of time, but comes from simply the formalizing of Quantum Mechanics, from the Hilbert space, that's it. Then it's absolutely viable that you can relate to ordinary time and time evolution as we know. Von Neumann provides a solution....it depends that you have a subsystem, it depends on a factorization.
Type One does not involve infinitely degrees of freedom. Type Two - evolution is unavoidable, it occurs infinitely.... You can not suppress it. It's not an inner automorphism. It has the amazing property that, it is in the center of the group of automorphisms....it doesn't depend on any choice. ....It is repetition that will allow you to SEE this time evolution... factorizations as infinite repetitions - otherwise you would not see it.
It's the factorization...The motivation has nothing to do with the ...topology...It's extremely strong, that's why it's the FIRST time I've given this talk. The passing of time is due to our partial knowledge... Then how do we single out this subsystem? I am unable to know.
.....

[tsjepettow]

Im sorry for the off topic comment, but your work as a whole is very intriguing and over the years has gave me many insights so I would like to use this opportunity to ask something.
Thank you for recommending “measuring meditation” the other day.
Can I reflect a question on your intellect?
Here goes:
When looking at the sky in a “samadhi emptiness” kind of way the phenomenon of beads of light all over in the sky appears. is there a explaination for this phenomenon? Funny thing the other day there was a storm and the phenomenon was not seen in the restless air.
It is kind of like what ed leedskalnin talked about:
“I can see tiny lightning in my eyes if I dose the eye lids and give a side push to the eye ball from the nose outward, but I could not do it every day. When I keep eating more for some time then I can see the tiny lightning while my eyes are open. All that I have to do is to turn my head from one side to the other side. This shows that we have in our body the same kind of magnets that are making the big lightning in the sky. When I connect my tongue and feet with micro-ampere meter. the meter shows that I have magnets in my body. Some times I have more of the magnets in my body than at other times. The presence of magnets in our body would indicate that the magnets are operating our muscles. ”
Are you familiar with ed leedskalnin?
His short booklets are very cryptic and supposed to contain the secrets to the knowledge of his “coral castle mystery”.
Thank you.