filmov
tv
Falsifying God w Tyler Vela
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff73a/ff73adeb9d23b087441d232b59bb57b5072c0e4e" alt="preview_player"
Показать описание
According to Theopedia, "God of the Gaps arguments are a discredited and outmoded approach to apologetics, in which a gap in scientific knowledge is used as evidence for the existence of God". ..."well, we don't understand that, so it must be God."
During our debate last March, Tyler Vela, he said, "What would falsify my belief is something like the ability of naturalism or atheism....or any type of materialism to account for the existence of things such as laws of logic, objective morality, the existence of something from nothing, the fine-tuning of the cosmos, specified complexity; where God functions ...as a simple explanation for all of these types of things."
So we're going to talk about that.
Regarding the notion that God is or could be a scientific explanation:
God functions as an explanation
the Deductive-Nomological Model, a scientific explanation
“the sentences constituting the explanans must be true”
“the explanans must contain at least one “law of nature”
If you like what I do, please consider supporting my efforts.
During our debate last March, Tyler Vela, he said, "What would falsify my belief is something like the ability of naturalism or atheism....or any type of materialism to account for the existence of things such as laws of logic, objective morality, the existence of something from nothing, the fine-tuning of the cosmos, specified complexity; where God functions ...as a simple explanation for all of these types of things."
So we're going to talk about that.
Regarding the notion that God is or could be a scientific explanation:
God functions as an explanation
the Deductive-Nomological Model, a scientific explanation
“the sentences constituting the explanans must be true”
“the explanans must contain at least one “law of nature”
If you like what I do, please consider supporting my efforts.
Комментарии