Refuting Aron Ra: Human Evolution

Is there evidence in the fossil record for human evolution? Aron Ra says yes--but the evidence says no!

The MUST-WATCH 3 hour movie debunking Aron Ra found here"

#YoungEarth, #Creationist, #Evolutionfalsified,
Our goal is to one day do full time ministry. Your amazing generosity, support, and donations has made us closer than ever to this dream! God bless.
Glad you found our channel! We believe that the Bible is true and can be put to the test for validity. We obviously know that the Bible has parables, allegories, poems, laws, short stories, genealogy, proverbs, sermons, prayers, prophecy, proverbial text, epistles, etc. But most importantly History. What we do is test the history with science and let the evidence show itself. We discovered that the evidence is in favor of Creation which just so happens to falsify evolution theory. This is why they know we are a threat and must remove Creation science from the education system at any cost.
As Young Earth Creationists we believe God created only 2 human beings at creation. We also believe Genesis where it says God created all the animals in groups, and our definition of relation actually starts in genesis, that of “organisms that descend from the same ancestral gene pool.” The most popular definition today actually is in reference to the Biblical Flood of Noah’s definition, this is because of Frank Lewis Marsh who coined the term baramin who used the Noah's Ark definition to define a kind, in which he stated “that the ability to hybridize and create viable offspring was a sufficient condition for being members of the same baramin.” But this is After the flood, making sure that Noah brought species that could reproduce with one another, it's not the original definition which has thrown everyone off to this day.

We believe as things speciate they lose allele variety and inherit more mutations. This shows us clear limitations with evolution, and shows that ancestrally that things were superior than today.
Dollo's law of irreversibility also shows us that evolution cannot go in reverse, so when they lose this genetic information after speciation, they can never regain it. This is why all horses today are now homozygous and horses in the past were heterozygous. They cannot return to their once superior state allowing for more diversity.

Evolution falsifies itself constantly but because they cannot allow the theory to die, they just rename and rehash it to the public as though everything is fine without anyone even noticing. A few examples;
*Darwinian Gradualism becomes punctuated equilibrium when they need it too and Darwin's slow natural processes which do not make leaps, was found to make huge leaps and renamed Saltationism. (complete contradiction).
*Ernst Mayr predicted that because evolution must be true, living organisms shouldn't share any genetic similarities because deep time would have separated them far too much. Then it was found they share many! So his predictions were removed and now it's used as one of the best pieces of evidence FOR evolution when it's actually a falsification of the theory.
*Dead Worthless Junk DNA became non-coding regulatory DNA. A clever rhetorical strategy they often use: Call it evolutionary junk at first; Then when functions are found, call it the "motor of evolution." Notice their rescued device every time is that they just ASSERT or ASSUME co-option.
* Functionless evolutionary leftover organs become functional organs deemed vestigial organs (lost primary function).
• A Singular Evolutionary tree became a 3 tier domain bush of life = Bacteria, Achaea, Eukarya.
*Mitochondrial clocks (Observed fast rates from trio method) became the slow phylogenetic assumption method because the clocks were falsifying the deep time theory.

[notevolution]

There's only one "Lucy", and she is custom manufactured from chimp, baboon, and human parts.

[RedefineLiving]

Will Aron respond? Perhaps, but he won’t be refuting anything.

[georgebond]

Scientists Conclude: Human Origins Research Is a Big Mess
In this press release the senior author of the new study, Sergio Almécija, a senior research scientist at the American Museum of Natural History, is also quoted as offering this remarkable admission:
“When you look at the narrative for hominin origins, it’s just a big mess — there’s no consensus whatsoever.”
“People are working under completely different paradigms, and that’s something that I don’t see happening in other fields of science.” …
“One hundred fifty years later, possible hominins–approaching the time of the human-chimpanzee divergence–have been found in eastern and central Africa, and some claim even in Europe. In addition, more than 50 fossil ape genera are now documented across Africa and Eurasia. However, many of these fossils show mosaic combinations of features that do not match expectations for ancient representatives of the modern ape and human lineages. As a consequence, there is no scientific consensus on the evolutionary role played by these fossil apes.”
American Museum of Natural History, “Review: Most human origins stories are not compatible with known fossils” at Eurekalert (May 6, 2021)

[dokidokisftfanclub]

garbage pile of 400 tiny fragment mean 400 solid intermediate specimen ? i have a box of toothpicks so basically a 2 story log cabin 🙂

[Bcklm]

This is so sad that you're so close to better understanding the world around you, yet you willfully choose ignorance.

[jeromem]

@SFT I didn't get a chance to reply to you before the stream ended my man, but I wanted to say that I've been watching multiple debates intensely and I have to say that your debate against Gav was by far the most, clear debate points I've ever seen. The Holy Spirits message was clearly seen through you that night man... amazing clear message!!!

[mr_rader]

Amen! Another great and informative video. Keep em coming boys you

[johnqsmith]

Sounds like humans ate monkeys…..yum yum

[cuteone]

Thanks for the video. Maybe shAron Ra will concede defeat, we’ll like many admitting the truth would cost them in dollars and ego, so most likely he won’t.

[jokerr]

really good video hahaha! can someone explain the 04:25 argument/refutation thought? im little slow...

[justaway]

Let me add something to your vocabulary my brother: Ediacaran

[Greg-nfir]

Always excellent content standing. I love this presentation spot-on.

[dokidokisftfanclub]

stop deleting my comments Soviet Tube! -- warning to Science Rules you're treading on thin troll ban ice