Unity vs Unreal Engine vs CryEngine

Показать описание

What do you think of Unity vs Unreal Engine vs CryEngine?

Unity probably wins in terms of beautiful graphics on a lean OpenGL frame.

I thought CryEngine had good graphics.

CryEngine excels at making a natural landscape like rivers, rocks, roads, wastelands and so forth.

In short, all the stuff people ignore during game-play.

Unreal Engine and Unity probably win on popularity.

Lots of people use Java, and almost no one likes it.

That’s the updates of the updates and the security holes.

Where do the game platforms I’m talking about rate well?

Unity is probably the better option for 2D games. It can do 3D, but Unity is so easy to learn for 2D, that it is a good option for a 2D beginner.

What about Unreal Engine?

Unreal Engine is pushing its functionality for 2D, but its 3D is better. Frankly, Unreal Engine is better for 3D games than Unity.

Unity has 3D functionality.

Not as good as Unreal Engine’s though. However, the basic version of Unity gets a lot of points for being free.

Free is always good.

Unity Pro costs a lot more, which has more functionality. Unity’s ability to publish to a mobile platform is an additional expense.

You have to pay to play – well, create games people play.

Unreal Engine’s strength is the same version for the same price; Unreal Engine’s licensing is cheaper than Unity Pro, though you’ll pay a 5% royalty off any games you sell.

That’s cheaper than the third or more Amazon Kindle takes.

Unity’s other strength is the integration with Maya, Blender, Cinema 4D and a lot of other tools.

Adobe Flash ought to be in there somewhere.

I ought to get an analysis of CryEngine in there, somewhere. CryEngine’s graphics probably exceed Unity for a lot of options though tie with Unreal Engine.

You said Unity was not great on graphics, which is why it has integration with all the good graphics tools.

CryEngine’s other strength is its powerful game design features.

You expect that from a game development tool anyway.

CryEngine’s weakness is a learning curve so steep many fall down it.

So what’s its strength aside from the beauty?

CryEngine has a cheap model and does not require you to pay game royalties. And you can almost rent CryEngine for development, instead of plopping down a couple thousand.

If I had a fortune to spend, I would not be trying to make a steady flow of beer money from selling games.

Then you need the cheap version of Unity to get started.

Рекомендации по теме

Комментарии

*Walks up to random guy on the subway* What do think of unityvsunrealenginevscryingene, Guy: wtf

hackerwaffle

if i spoke like that to a random NYC subway passenger regarding Game Engines I'd get stabbed in the abdomen.

CLPANC

what!? who ignores landscape in the game? i LOVE a fantastic landscape and details. it shows love in the game. sure, it's easy to make a river, but adding things for the time frame (trash, logs, bodies, etc) is fantastic! it's the little things a gamer appreciates. it's all about the love.

PappaBahamut

Haha, this is hilarious. Such a natural conversation

xxMoffexx

*Clicks*
*Sees intro*
Heck...
*Leaves*

davidkroft

Why does this have so many dislikes. I think it was actually well done. Animation was pretty cool and decent enough animation newbies like me to understand. Actually i gave this guy a like...

allaboutthementality

Anyone realized where the guy's staring at throughout the video? :P

sicfxmusic

EVERYTHING YOU ARE SAYING ABOUT THE ENGINES ARE WRONG. THIS IS SO BAD

coolcookies

Question: if you would make the exact same game in each of the engines, how would they compare, (process, export size, etc)?

Rouxkat

What each engine does best
Unity: Most user friendly and decent graphics/performance depending on you
Cryengine: Best graphics
Unreal: Most professional and good graphics

Lidoe

Let's see here:
Unity 5 seems better for beginners but the graphics are still far from UE4 and CryEngine. For performance, I think Unity 5 is the worst of all that's because you do the scripting in C# or JS. But now unity only requires you to pay if you earn more than UE4 seems to be the best for big games right now as it's only a bit harder than unity (the Blueprint visual scripting is pretty cool). It's also free, including the source code (there's a 5% royalty fee if earn more than $3000/3mo though). As for CryEngine, I don't know anything besides from it's subscription model. The graphics seems to be better than UE4 though, at least for me :)

For better cross-compatibility, get Unity
For good performance and nice graphics, UE4 seems to be the most balanced
Get CryEngine for... for IDK :p

That's all I know (at least it's my opinion)

And... I think most of your videos get more dislikes than likes because mostly you compare things based purely on opinions, and some of the comparisons are wrong, yup

vinardokie

why does everytime i enter in on of these techy help videos is full of dislikes?

weriakable

unity is easy, but it hardcoded to implemented the OpenCL Codes :3

mylipho

because lack of forward rendering in ue4 unity 5 is a lot better than ue4 regarding to graphics
and for coding I would prefer c# to C++
who doesn't?
just because some great games has been created by cryengine doesn't mean it is the best, at my point of view it's the worst

yusefghatavi