SONY a6700 vs. SONY A7iii - Buy APS-C Flagship or Full-Frame Autofocus BODY for Photography? [2024]

Buy sony a6700 aps-c mirrorless flagship or full-frame sony a7iii autofocus body for portrait photography in 2024? Prime lenses used in this sony a6700 vs. sony a7iii photoshoot behind the scenes are the sigma 56mm f1.4 dc dn and sigma 85mm f1.4 dg dn for aps-c and full-frame sharp e-mount mirrorless portrait photography in 2024! We do a comparison review of portrait samples, picture quality, sharpness, bokeh, portrait photography settings, image quality, cinematic, sharpness, 24 megapixels, autofocus, video footage in 1080p, slow motion, 11fps, e-mount sony body and bokeh. You can also use the sigma 56mm f1.4 and sigma 85mm f1.4 for your a5000, a5100, a6000, a6100, a6300, a6400, a6500, a6600, a6700, a7ii, a7r, a7s, a7ii, a7rii, a7sii, a7iii, a7riii, a7siiii, a7iv, a7riv, a7siv, zv-e10, zv-e10ii, sony a7cii, sony a7c zv-1, sony a9 and sony a9ii.

In this sony a6700 vs. sony a7iii photoshoot behind the scenes we took amazing aps-c and full-frame portraits at the cherry blossom street in bielefeld. Which is the best sony aps-c or full-frame camera for portrait photography in 2024? We will compare both amazing cameras and show you amazing photos for sharp portrait photography in 2024! All the portrait photography settings in this sony a6700 vs. sony a7iii portrait photography comparison are taken with my sigma 56mm f1.4 and sigma 85mm f1.4 which are my best aps-c and full-frame sharp prime lenses on a budget in 2024!
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
✖ MY SOCIALS ✖
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
(*) Photography Setup: (Affiliate Links to Amazon)

✖ CAMERAS ✖

✖ LENSES ✖

▸(*) MUSIK I USE: (Affiliate Link to Epidemic Sound)
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
(0:00) Sony a6700 vs. Sony A7iii in 2024
(0:14) We compare a6700 vs. Sony A7iii
(0:49) 1st Portrait samples, video footage & sharpness
(1:50) Will we QUIT the Photoshoot or keep going?
(2:17) APS-C vs. Full-Frame in Low Light Photography
(3:12) Buy Sony a6700 or Sony A7iii for Portrait Photography?
(4:39) My Opinion on the Sony a6700! Is it that GREAT?
(5:30) Sony a6400 or BUY Sony a6700 in 2024?
(6:35) Final Portrait samples side-by-side comparison
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Subscribe "olivershutterspeed" 🔔 for more videos:
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
✖ Music ✖
►🎵 Epidemic Sound

#sonymirrorless #a6700 #sigma56mm #photography #apsc #sigma56mm #photography #sigma85mm #sonya6700

E-Mail Contact:

(*) DISCLOSURES - Affiliate Links:

Some of the links in my video descriptions are affiliate links, which means, at no extra cost to you, I will make a small commission if you click them and make a purchase.

[Clarkau]

The skin tones were better in the 6700 but the f1.4 on full frame just smashes the background. Maybe a 85mm 1.8 FF vs the 56mm 1.4 APSC would be more interesting comparison. 🤔
Im on the fence about swaping from a nikon z6 to a Sony for better lens choice and better AF but cant decide on what Sony. Thanks for the tip on picking the 6400 over the 6700! I could always try a used 6400 and prime lens without breaking the bank.

[withoutpassid]

The a6700 seems to have better light metering for portrait photos. I’m delighted to see that the aps-c combo was able to render many 3D pop pics. I tempt to get the Viltrox 75mm 1.2 but after watching your vid, I think I’ll go for the Sigma 56 1.4

[unperfectcooking]

From amateur perspective, after seeing those huge lenses on FF cameras I would choose apsc (or even m34) camera today - the size factor is never considered in reviews.
Now I own zv-e10 and sigma 18-50 and I consider it as best travel/all in one combo. Fits into backpack and covers most of my needs.
My next camera would be zve10 2nd generation if it woudnt be not overgrown otherwise I would consider a6700 but for better price than nowadays. A73 in my opinion is great for photos and is very good value for money - but lenses are huge and expensive.
Greetings!

[UPD]

Choice is now harder that ever when camera quality are pretty close to each other, the more I watch comparisons the more I am getting lost, it is so difficult to decide which camera is suitable for me now @@

[Joh]

It's always the same. For portrait shooting offers full frame a smoother bokeh, although there are some very interesting lenses as the Viltrox 75 1.2 for aps-c now. For me as hobby photographer who shoots a lot different thinks from milky way to macro is aps-c by far the better choice because of seize, weight, costs and more reach for tele and better depth of field for macro. For portait shooting are my A6400 and Sigma 56 1.4 enough for me. It's my personal choice. Thank you for your comparison, it makes the differences clear.

Bokeh is just magnificent with the full frame one

[tomirwinphoto]

QUESTION: When shooting the slow motion with the a7III what fps did you shoot with before slowing it down to 60 fps in this video?

[Cyclulk]

Thanks you, I like the a7iii photos better but it was kinda expected. That being said, I went with the a6700 for the video capability, compact size and lenses prices. It really depends on what you 'll want to do with your camera really. That being said, the a6700 is still very capable in photography.

[Tech]

If I own the Sony A6400 and the Sigma 16 30 and sony 50 OSS. Do you think changing the body good

[Moshe_Dayan]

I don't give a damn about bokeh. Frankly, I can't really understand why people want to pay more money to get blurrier backgrounds. Yes, I get it. Subject separation, popping, etc. But seriously, you're talking about paying more money for blurrier backgrounds... But what I am really, REALLY concerned about is sharpness and image quality. I keep looking at pixel noise, and although I see some additional noise on the APSC images when really zoomed in, I also look at the size and weight of the lenses, and imagine not wanting to carry them around with me. If the best camera is the one you have with you, then I'd rather de-noise a little bit of noise in post, and buy more, lighter and cheaper lenses with an a6700, than carry bulkier, more expensive lenses around.

[Jakepf]

6:00 wow, that's crazy. I'd really be buying the a6700 to upgrade from my a6300. The software is getting a little too old, so it's a bit annoying. But I also want to go full frame because I have an 85mm full frame tamron lens

[dercharmeur]

I'm thinking about buying the Ricoh GR IIIX for snapshot portraits. Because it's so small, you always have a camera with you

[IRFAN-posz]

Very excellent work, I have a6700 with Sony 35mm oss and Sony 16-135, please advise which lens should I out and which one in. Thanks.

[bondgabebond]

You did your beautiful model justice. Both cameras made beautiful images. Only real difference is the depth of field but that can be ignored or overcome. The young lady's features are perfectly sharp (eye lashes, eyes, hair, clothing). I am amazed today more than before at how good Sony aps-c cameras are. No real need for big heavy and expensive gear for many jobs. The little guy does extremely well.

[BloodCatGang]

Man great video, can u make more video a73 with different lenses?

[wakeywarrior]

Always go full frame now if you can afford to do so. On every photo it was easy to tell which was full frame. It has a definitive quality filmic look. APSC has to rely on more digital processing.

[SatoruGojo-of]

I guess all correctly, rn im about to buy the a7iii 2nd hand, and purchase the a6700 using credit card. An upgrade for my a6500 and a7ii

[BarryJohnson]

I have to rewatch this on a big screen. On the phone I didn't have a preference.

[MayankNimbalkar]

Hello Sir,
I am Inclined towards buying Sony A6700 i am confused between the lens wether to get 16-50 mm Power zoom lens or 18-135 mm zoom lens, it has an roughly 240 USD price difference in India, mostly in want to use it for Landscape, Portraits indoor and outdoor & Events.

[TRtheLoanGuy]

Were those straight out of camera jpegs or did you color grade at all.