Why you should upload to Adobe Stock. No this is not sponsored 😁

5 Reasons you should be uploading more and more photos to Adobe Stock, with so much competition in the Stock Photography world contributing to one of the fastest growing agencies might be a very good idea.

✔︎ 📸 Affiliate links to the gear I use 📸
===============================

Small Stock or Product Photo Studio
——————————————————

*Full disclaimer I receive a small percentage of the sale generated by the use of this link, and it doesn't have to be the particular item listed*

✔︎Links to my best performing Stock Agencies
===============================
===============================
🎶 🎵Music and sound effects get a FREE Month:

How to support Wollertz Photography
===============================

Contact info
===============================

[wollertz]

Images form this video have already started selling, a little dog in a puffy red coat has commercial value 😁.

[mattfowlerkc]

Adobe is one of the best for sure. They have a lot of customers and pay better than most. It would be nice if they started taking Editorial content more like Shutterstock.

[ChooseAdventureCaliforniaStyle]

Bambi takes great direction! Great information. That location looks wild!

[GregKelton]

I submit to 14 stock houses since 2017 and Adobe is my best income generator by 30%. Love your channel, learning a lot. Thanks

[CherylvanHooft]

Thanks for the great info. I really appreciate it. Your videos are easy to follow, and are fun too! 😀

[mirovrlik]

You are right, Adobe is right now my number one stock site

[thatfrenchbloke]

While I have been doing photography for more than 30 years, I only recently (in June) started uploading my pictures to photography stock sites. I started with only two, Shutterstock and Adobe. I found Adobe to be by far the most difficult to deal with. It takes forever for them to review the picture, and when they do, most of them are rejected to what it sounds like phoney reasons: Either they say that there is a technical issue with the quality of the picture when i know there is none. For example, I did a series that is akin to some product photography, camera on a tripod, in my studio. Always the same lighting, camera setting, post-processing etc. Some pictures from the set were accepted, some others were not. Some other pictures were refused because just because they did not like the aesthetics of them... At the moment, I am trying to find out if Adobe is worth the time taken to upload the pictures.

[TheZGALa]

Great tips! Bambi is such a cute 'fetcher'! ;) I have had three photos pending review for more than two weeks and they sent a message saying it could be as long as 8 weeks! I hope I can get in soon, I have a growing number of pics and clips (and some ai) that I think are good enough to pass QC, which I failed with my first 3 uploads.

[johnpollock]

I agree with your reasoning, but for someone who has been at it as an aside for 2 years, my results have been quite poor. Initially my problem was meeting their Quality demands. I seem to have solved those problems, but now it is the excessive delay between submission and learning whether I still have the right stuff. There is a note on the site that submissions may require up to 4 weeks. In two recent small batch submissions, both took slightly over 4 weeks. Otherwise, I like Adobe over most of the other 5 where I upload. Thanks for all your tips.

[sandraaliassandrus]

Bammmmbiii!! So pretty. Esa perrita es hermosa!! Me gusto el video, no entiendo todo lo que decis en ingles por eso siempre miro la version en español pero hoy justo aparecio este video, muchas gracias!!

[TheZGALa]

I am using an old beat up Canon Rebel T6 and it has been challenging to get sharp shots, though I am slowly making progress. I look forward to affording an upgrade!

[sandraaliassandrus]

que lindo efecto al final del video, que se dobla y aparece como sucribirse y darle me gusta.

[philliphickox]

I find at present it can take weeks for QC to either pass or reject and more frustrating is they may only QC one image out of 10 in the line up.

[rolfgkarlsson]

Thanks Charles. Yes, Adobe is clearly number one for me. I also just upload, but it’s frustrating that the review time is so long now. I’m guessing the reason is the overflow of AI images.

[gilste]

I've sold 5 images this month on adobe stock for $3.72 which is far more than you would be paid on most stock sites.

[michaelhayward]

I agree Adobe are tough to get submissions accepted

[CarmenSisson]

Question about Adobe free content: I just got the offer today, and it’s tempting, but I wonder which you chose, the annual license or the perpetual. It seems to me the annual is the better deal, because I hate for my photos to be free forever, but then, they’re not offering me much. $136 for annual or $340 for perpetual. I can’t decide which to choose or if I should choose it at all. Which did you choose? Would you do it for such small amounts, or give them more time to maybe make money?

[ScamsandShams]

Really Great video 


Question please.. if I used the normal pics I taken and covert into a cartoon style with befunky website..its not listed as an ai 

Like the other programes they have..


Would it be ok to submit to adobe stock I  the normal way without ticking the ai box ?


As I don't want to get my account suspended 


Kind regards

[Rizkicandra_]

So, mr i have question for you, i started on shutterstock, what you think about that

[bobk]

hello, how do you upload 100 images of the same shoot locations without having them rejected? since some of the images will be very close to your keywords