The Case for the Papacy - Christopher Tomaszewski, Suan Sonna, Tyler McNabb, Erick Ybarra

Intros - 00:00:00
Myths about the Papacy - 00:04:35
The Biblical Case for the Papacy - 00:40:48
The Probabilities and Epistemology of the Papacy - 01:12:29
Eastern Orthodox Objections - 01:35:43

The purpose of Intellectual Conservatism is to defend the true, good and beautiful things of life that are jeopardized in mainstream academia and society. On this page, you will find artwork, music, satire, academic papers, lectures and my own projects defending the duty of conserving these true, good and beautiful things.

[norwegiancatholicism]

Such a great case for the papacy, I'll definitely be using this as a refference to defend the papacy! It has helped me a lot in my decision of converting to Catholicism

[fiveadayproductions]

@Intellectual Conservatism
Great show! You should dedicate a show solely for book recommendations on each of the topics you've covered in the past from the bottom up:
1) Against Scientism
2) Positive case for the Existence of God
3) Positive Case for the Existence of an Immortal Soul
4) The Case for Objective Morality and Natural Law
5) Historical Case for Christ
6) Biblical and Patristic Case for Catholicism
7) Biblical, Patristic and Historical Case for the Papacy
8) Tackling Catholic misconceptions.

[markstevenpandan]

Christopher's parallel between 1 Chronicles 28 and Acts 15 seems to be from Dimond. :) It's cool too.

[SpencerBauly]

Just discovered your channel -- really great episode, keep 'em coming!

[johnsayre]

Did Suan make a Step Brothers joke? "Pam? Pan?"

[Augustinianismus]

Great show! I'll have to look at your Biblical case again though, with the slides. It was certainly an interesting presentation.

[therussiancatholic]

Some Russian theologians thought Khomiakov to be a heretic, because of what his conclusions meant for the state Church of the Russian Empire that sure did work (and in many ways still works) like papacy. But the "freedom" objection actually became quite popular, even among the so-called traditionalists.

[danielvecchio]

The First Vatican Council is quoting from Session III of the Council of Ephesus: “Philip the presbyter and legate of the Apostolic See said: There is no doubt, and in fact it has been known in all ages, that the holy and most blessed Peter, prince (ἔξαρχος) and head of the Apostles, pillar of the faith, and foundation (θεμέλιος) of the Catholic Church, received the keys of the kingdom from our Lord Jesus Christ, the Saviour and Redeemer of the human race, and that to him was given the power of loosing and binding sins: who down even to today and forever both lives and judges in his successors.”

[thecouple]

Doesn't St. Robert Bellarmine tech that a heretic bishop or pope looses all jurisdiction from the time he begins to preach heresy?

[markstevenpandan]

That'd be 2am here haha. Inasmuch as I want to watch it as soon as it is available, I'd be watching it tomorrow.

[TheCynicogue]

Would you care to do a debate on the papacy? I’ve been looking to debate with a Catholic on Papal supremacy and/or Papal primacy for some time now and I’d love to talk to you.

[ultimouomo]

The Bible scholar and self-proclaimed "Paulinist", F.F.Bruce, in his book, "Peter, Stephen, James and John", states that (1 Peter) is addressed to Gentile converts in various provinces of Asia Minor. (including two which were evangelized by Paul).

[GloomZzyy]

I am very much open to submitting to rome. But every time I hear one of these arguments it's just not convincing enough.

[rbnmnt]

I congratulate you for the title of this video, "a case for the papacy." That means that it's probably Catholic teachings of doctrine. What you could not and did not label it was "A BIBLICAL case for the papacy." Why? Because there is no biblical case.

[AlphaOmega]

Acts 15:6-8 "And the APOSTLES and ANCIENTS ***ASSEMBLED*** to consider of this matter.. and **PETER** rose up and said "Men AND Brethren: *YOU ALL KNOW* [can't claim ignorance] that **GOD CHOSE ME** from *AMONG YOU* that by ***MY MOUTH*** the GENTILES should **HEAR** the word of **THE GOSPEL** and *BELIEVE.* -(some at this meeting were *NOT* Brethren so it's a VERY SCARY thought he might be speaking to *YOU* and are NOT considered to be his brethren (aka Christian)! Am I wrong? Do you accept what St. Peter is saying? No?)

Why? Because the source of much Anti-Catholic hatred are from *Fake Christian baptisms* because they DO indeed impart unto the souls of men *ANOTHER SPIRIT* - and it NOT Holy!

2 Cor 11:4 For if HE WHO COMES preaches **ANOTHER JESUS** .. or if you RECEIVE A **DIFFERENT SPIRIT** which you have NOT RECEIVED from us..

2 Cor 11:4 Commentary: "a *Spirit different* from Him whom you received at your *BAPTISM"* -Expositor's Greek Testament Commentary