The Teleological Argument | FINE TUNING - Dr. William Lane Craig | Intelligent Design

preview_player
Показать описание
Like, Share, Comment, Subscribe, Hit That Notification Bell & Select 'ALL'

TO SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL:
Become an EVIDENT one9teen Patron

THE TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT - FINE TUNING

PREMISE
1. The fine tuning of the universe is either due to physical necessity, chance or design;

PREMISE
2. It is not due to physical necessity or chance;

Therefore:

CONCLUSION
3. It is due to design.

FULL UN-EDITED VIDEO (01:47:46):
William Lane Craig vs Lewis Wolpert

#apologetics
  1. EVIDENT one9teen
  2. apologetics
  3. #apologetics
  4. philosophy
  5. theology
  6. Christianity
Рекомендации по теме
The Fine Tuning 0:09:30

The Fine Tuning Argument (Arguments For God Episode #6)

The Watchmaker Argument 0:09:43

The Watchmaker Argument - Debunked (Teleological Argument - Refuted)

The Teleological Argument 0:03:44

The Teleological Argument | FINE TUNING - Dr. William Lane Craig | Intelligent Design

An Atheist Debunks 0:09:13

An Atheist Debunks the Fine Tuning Argument - Sapient Saturdays 🌎

The Fine-Tuning of 0:06:23

The Fine-Tuning of the Universe

Intelligent Design: Crash 0:09:34

Intelligent Design: Crash Course Philosophy #11

Fine Tuning Argument 0:00:42

Fine Tuning Argument SPEED RUN!

Fine-tuning is a 0:06:14

Fine-tuning is a good argument for God - Richard Dawkins

Debunking the 'Fine 0:08:45

Debunking the 'Fine Tuning' Argument (Sean Carroll)

REBUTTING atheist objections 1:05:45

REBUTTING atheist objections to the fine-tuning argument

Christopher Hitchens Impressed 0:01:31

Christopher Hitchens Impressed With The Fine Tuned Universe Argument

Teleological Argument - 0:24:06

Teleological Argument - Dr. William Lane Craig vs Dr. Sean Carroll (Greer Heard Forum 2014)

Cosmic Skeptic on 0:02:55

Cosmic Skeptic on The Fine Tuning Argument

What is the 0:04:35

What is the Most Persistent Objection to the Fine-Tuning Argument?

The Fine Tuning 0:10:13

The Fine Tuning of the Universe | Intelligent Design - Dr. Frank Turek

What are Richard 0:06:21

What are Richard Dawkins Objections to the Teleological Argument?

The most OP 0:11:59

The most OP argument for (defending) God

The Teleological Argument 0:01:07

The Teleological Argument from Fine-tuning

The Teleological Argument 0:17:54

The Teleological Argument explained

Hume on the 0:25:28

Hume on the Teleological Argument

William Paley's Watchmaker 0:03:36

William Paley's Watchmaker Analogy (Extract from 'The Teleological Argument')

The Teleological Argument 0:08:29

The Teleological Argument from Fine-tuning

The Arguments for 0:17:10

The Arguments for God's Existence Tier List

The teleological argument 0:09:15

The teleological argument for God – Eric Metaxas

Комментарии
Автор

Like, Comment, Share, Subscribe, Hit That Notification Bell & Select 'ALL'.
⬇️ Frank Turek & William Lane Craig - The Multiverse, Fine Tuning & The Finite Past

evidentoneteen
Автор

It really is so insane
Can't comprehend it
Nobody really can
I mean it's so much deeper then we as humans can understand
And no I don't believe we are here by chance

andreasimon
Автор

There are no chances.

Especially if you need a second one.

hashtag
Автор

Enjoyed and appreciated the video. Sounds of subscribing, liking, etc. were pretty distracting.

abnercampos
Автор

If one chooses to believe or disbelieve something that is incomprehensible (that cannot be either proved or disproved), they have to do it by faith, imo.

Keyfer
Автор

The constants have always existed since the beginning of the universe. There is no way to test them.

The three premises for the fine-tuning of the universe:

1. Natural causes
2. Chance
3. Design

All three don't disprove eachother.

MrFossilabgfyth
Автор

Just for fun, try to understand the implications of the double-slit experiment.

Keyfer
Автор

Those loud "subscribe" and "press like" stuff scared me and got me to dislike the video and not watch it anymore

kpballa
Автор

Like there's knobs in the sky, right?
The Moon is not the Sun because it's not.
Reality exists because it does.
In an ever evolving universe, still only the possibile happens. Many possibilities never do.
Chance? Coinsidence?
Obviously, yes.
Science requires evidence.
Nonsense babble just has to sound clever.
It's the exact same leap of faith that leads to a magical designer - without the magical part.

Christopher_Bachm