Math Olympiad Questions | Find X | X^x=X | challenging Algebra Problem | Olympiad Mathematics

preview_player
Показать описание
In this video, we will solve this algebraic equation problem trending 2022. The problem is find the value of x in X^x=X . Math Olympiad Questions
we will solve for all possible values of X. This is actually one of the challenging math problems so do not ignore this video.

A video course for students taking the GCSE Maths exam

Disclaimar:

Affiliate Links:
The writing Tablet I use for my videos
Veikk A15 Pro
Buy Now👇👇👇

Wacom Writing Tablet

BOOKS
Math Olympiad

Awesome Electronics Course

If you are new to my channel, please subscribe, like, comment and share.

Playlist for other videos
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This is the most obvious problem I have encountered. Literally got the answer after a look on the problem.

garimasharma
Автор

To be honest i could not have done this but i knew answer would be 1 or - 1 because of hit and trial method

onepiecefan
Автор

but... why all this?
x^x=x
x^x=x^1
Equal bases, equal exponents
x=1

isaacbaruccruzdasilva
Автор

The solution x = 1 is trivial : 1^1 = 1. No log nor ln needed. The solution x = -1 is slightly less obvious but still a college student could find that (-1)^(-1) is the same as 1 / (-1) which equals -1. Thus there are 2 solutions possible : 1 and -1. No logarithms needed.

tahititoutou
Автор

It would be so much easier just to take the log base x of both sides, getting log_x(x^x) = log_x(x).
Then, since we know x^x is x to the xth power and x is x to the 1st power, we can reduce the equation to x = 1.

yanything
Автор

they have the same base "X" so their exponents can be equated... x=1

mrtrinity
Автор

Before watching the video:
Given:
x↑x = x

To find:
x

Taking log on both sides:
log(x↑x) = log(x)

using log(a↑b) = b·log(a):
x·log(x) = log(x)

moving all terms to LHS:
x·log(x) – log(x) = 0
log(x)·(x – 1) = 0
From here, log(x) = 0 or x – 1 = 0.

both cases give you x = 1.



By taking log of both sides, we implicitly took x > 0.
For x < 0, we can take absolute value on both sides and result in the same process, and by negating the RHS to invert the absolute operator, we get x = –1 as a possible result. Cross checking against the original equation, we find that x = –1 also works (–1↑(–1) = 1/(–1) = –1). Thus, x = ±1 are the only solutions.

GirishManjunathMusic
Автор

What an absolutely convoluted way of complexing this problem just gir the sake of a longer video.

Just take natural log on both sides, and use log properties.

You'll get x lnx = lnx

Divide by ln x on both sides since lnx =/= 0 and you end up with x=1

SebastienPatriote
Автор

what i did was graph x^x at various points (-2, -1, 1/4, 1/2, 1, 2). -1 and 1 obviously solve the equation, but to prove there are no other options, we take the derivative of x^x, that being (ln(x)+1)x^x, and since x^x is never 0, there must only be turning points where ln(x)+1 is 0, which occurs only at x = 1/e. therefore for 0<x<1, x^x > x. then, since ln(x)+1) and x^x are strictly increasing for x>1/e, we know x^x is greater than x for x>1 as well. for negative values, we model x^x as -(-x)^x. this gives a continuous model, which agrees at all points where x^x is defined and negative, of the lower (closer to x) branch of the negative values of x^x. as it is continuous, we can take its derivative as well: -(ln(-x)+1)(-x)^x. this is only 0 when ln(-x)+1 is 0, i.e., x=-1/e. by similar logic to before, for 0<x<-1, -(-x)^x < x. furthermore, since -1/(-x)^(-x) is a mirror image of -1/x^x, which is strictly greater than -1/x for x>1 since their reciprocals have the reverse relationship, we know that -(-x)^x is strictly greater than 1/x, and thus x, for x<-1, QED.

rarebeeph
Автор

Делим обе части на х
х^х:х=1
х^х-1=1
Значит либо
х-1=0 х≠0
Либо
х=1 х-1-любое число
Значит х=1
Ответ:1
Замечание :если степень с рациональным показателем, то основание может быть только неотрицательным

uueoztc
Автор

you messed up everything at 3:22 by multiplying only left side of the equation to (-1)^(-y-1) and your following statement "(-y)^(-y-1) is never negative" is totally wrong (for y=2, (-2)^(-2-1)=(-1/2)^3= -1/8 -negative number) Here is what you had to do:
x<0 => x^(x-1)=1.
Since x-1< - 1< 0 => |x|=1 (must be so) => x=-1 (since x<0) => try (-1)^2=1 - good to go, So the final two are 1 and -1

towalks
Автор

I didn't need logs to solve this. From x^(x-1) =1, there are three branches. The first is that the exponent, x-1, is 0. This leads to x =1. The second branch is that the base, x, is 1. The third and less considered branch is that the base is -1 with an even exponent. If x = -1, the exponent is -1-1 = -2 which is even.

robertlunderwood
Автор

0^0 is not indeterminate
It's undefined
Only when the limit of x approaches 0^0 can we say it's indeterminate.

insterquiliniisinvenitur
Автор

You can also just take the log of the absolute value of both sides and you'll get x=-1 or 1

awildscrub
Автор

Bro it's way simpler than that

x^x = x

Therefore x^x = x^1

Since both bases are equal then we can equate the exponents

x^x = x^1

x=1

HallStar
Автор

I believe the reasoning is flawed at 3:46: if y is positive and even, e.g.2, then (-1)^(-2-1) =1/(-1)^3 = -1

Reasoning could go like this: If we are solving for real y, then (-y)^(-y) = -y with y>0 implies that y is an odd integer. Then -1/y^y = -y so we have 1=y/y^y so y=y^y, which is the problem we already solved for x, with 1 as its solution. y=1 is indeed an odd integer, so our solution is x=-y=-1.

Bonus: Solving over the complex numbers we can infer from ||x^x|| =||x|| that ||x||=1 so we can write x=exp(iφ) for real φ. Then we get (exp(iφ))^exp(iφ) = exp(iφ).
Using the power rule (a^b)^c=a^(bc) and the fact that the function exp is periodic mod 2πi to infer that
iφ exp(iφ) = iφ +2kπi for integer values of k. Divide by i to get

φ (exp(iφ)-1) = 2kπ

The RHS is real, and the LHS is real when φ is an integer multiple of π. Setting φ=nπ and divide by nπ, the equation becomes

n((-1)^n -1) = 2k

If n is even this has solution k=0 and we get x=1
If n is odd this has solution k=-n and we get x=-1

So, solving over the complex numbers does not give any new values for x

koenth
Автор

if you are solving the equation in real numbers, x=-1 must be rejected because f(x)^g(x) => f(x)≥0

renyxadarox
Автор

x=0 is not solution.
so for x<>0 : x^x=x <====> x^(x-1)=1.
But x^p=1 only in 2 cases:
* IxI=1 x=1 or x=-1: 2 solutions 1, -1
* or p=0 <====> x-1=0 <====> x=1.
Therfore, s={ -1; 1}.

maths_plus
Автор

To get x = 1 you could have very easily just said from x^x = x to x = log_x(x) which is 1 so x = 1
For x = -1 I have no idea

DeJay
Автор

I guessed 1 and -1 but was too lazy to do all the work. But thanks for doing it for me! And good video!

owlsmath