The First Amendment Explained | Quick Learner

preview_player
Показать описание
The First Amendment protects freedoms of speech, press, religion, assembly, and petition. This sounds straightforward, but the First Amendment is still the subject of continuing interpretation and dispute.

𝐀𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐃𝐮𝐤𝐞 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐲
Established in 1924 in Durham, North Carolina, Duke University is one of the world’s leading institutions for education, research, and patient care.

𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 #𝐃𝐮𝐤𝐞𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐲

MB01XE5JR1SIHEE
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Here's the full text of the amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

rotehaus
Автор

This 2 minute video should be standard in the training for all Police/Law enforcement agencies.

quonslecn
Автор

Where does it say in the first amendment you can't be obscene? Dont add stuff that's not there.

gameoverwehaveeverypixelco
Автор

CORRECTION: 'Defamation" laws allow for CIVIL damages to be awarded to the defamed party. NOBODY goes to It is not a criminal offense to "defame" someone.

stevelangstroth
Автор

1 st amendment = say whatever the hell you want, , , insults are legal

MAGApepe
Автор

The 1st Amendment is so very important!!!

Gideon
Автор

Thank you so much, my dad is yelling at me and I’m crying right now. Your voice makes me happy and I’m learning easier. Ty

dominicxrae
Автор

In regards to social media being private entities, they can't use their freedom of speech to sensor others freedom of speech, that's not compatible seeing as they are the new public square. Section 230 protects them from the speech of their users so there's no reason to sensor speech unless it's a crime like threat or iligal activity. They have taken policing of speech to levels that interferes with the first amendment.
That's what's being fought right now with Trump's lawsuit.

gameoverwehaveeverypixelco
Автор

Here's an idea;;
If you're going to make a video about one of our constitutional rights, present that right as it was written before you go into all the "limits" and "interpretations" the gov Has put on that "right".

The Supreme corrupt court is the branch that's failing us more than any other.
They consistantly allow individual liberties to be limited by overreaching gov which supports/ represents only the wealthy few

jupitercyclops
Автор

Can you explain the 14th amendment..so people understand ..we the people need to do some cleaning 🙄

bearg
Автор

Share this with all the POLICE STATION so they can learn what was thought in Elementary Jr High and High School… THEY FORGET ABOUT OUR RIGHTS EVERY DAY!

psavegas
Автор

I believe in (almost) absolute free speech, but I do believe it is HOW it is said that makes the difference. I am also a firm believer in the saying, "Your rights end where mine begin". I think a good litmus test for hearing how it is said should be a 'courtroom test.' In other words, if you could get away with saying it in court to a judge, then it is free speech. If you could be whisked away in handcuffs under a contempt of court charge, then it is not so. In other words, a lot of the so-called First Amendment auditors should not be allowed to get away with some of their antics. If you think about it, many of them claim to be 'journalists' while acting like commercial production companies. The last I checked, there are some limitations to 'news' and 'commercial production' (eg--obtaining permission to film and film in public just to name a few).

culcune
Автор

You forfeit your first amendment rights by posting on youtube, facebook and twitter...

spankymcduff