Proving a Tautology by Using Logical Equivalences

Показать описание

Jason Malozzi

Рекомендации по теме

Комментарии

Thank you so much.... This was very helpful

joonsoftlips

If it was q-->p do we say it's the same as p-->q just found out it's going to be ~q ٧ p

halo_jk

show that the conditional statement (p∨q)∧(¬p∨r)⇒(q∨r) is tautology without using truth tables, Sir can you please solve this question, its urgent

ashmirakhan

Awesome video. Easy-to-follow and great explanation

epkademy

Thank you so much for this video. Tomorrow I have an exam and I was supper nervous. And your video just save me😊
Keep up the good work✨
You should get a job in my college🥺

tamayasara

Many thanks for this help. I kept keeping stuck with this exercise, it is nice to see now how to work my way out of these situations. I appreciate this.

valeriereid

Rodriguez Helen Williams Richard Taylor Ronald

GaryJacksonMoore-kq

why do we have professors when people like u

dbuc

White Sharon Rodriguez Charles Walker Elizabeth

JomilaHak-bu

Thanks for this video am sitting fory exams on 21 july which is next week 2022 and i was nervous about propositoons proofs and you have saved me.Please continue to make more videos may GOD BLESS YOU🙏🙏

lynamhango

Thank you sir for using this method. I used modus ponens and Modus tollens to solve these types of problems.

pinku

Gonzalez Steven Taylor Shirley Lewis Steven

jonbootclifford

Tnxs for this video it helped me too from #Ethiopia

juicewrldforever

Lopez Michelle Clark Paul Wilson Frank

MaxPenelope-wj

where can i find more example problems to practice with

law

Anderson Brenda Walker Ronald Taylor Paul

HanifaMoni-zc

Hall Scott Miller Elizabeth Moore Carol

MaxPenelope-wj

you're a great teacher, thanks Jason

felifrit

Hi Jason thanks for this explanation. It is very clear. I do know if you still read comments but I want to ask anyone here but I wonder if someone can explain the conditional part. The negation of the left and right. I got stuck here and I found your vid!

finback

can anyone plz explain the 4th and 5th line, , , , absorption law....?😔😔😔

StayWithMath-pvdx

Proving a Tautology by Using Logical Equivalences

Proving a Tautology by Using Logical Equivalences

Proving a Tautology by Truth Table

Show that (p ∧ q) → (p ∨ q) is a tautology

Logical Equivalence Proof

Prove the Logical Expression Tautology

Proving a tautology

Proving a tautology using a Truth Table

Show that p V ~p is a Tautology by using a Truth Table

Proving a compound proposition is a tautology part 1 of 2

Tautology, Contradiction and Contingency - Logic - Discrete Mathematics

17. Tautology by logical equivalences || Tautology without truth table || Discrete Mathematics

Propositional Logic − Logical Equivalences

Truth Table Tutorial - Discrete Mathematics Logic

Truth Tables - Tautology and Contradiction

tautology and contradiction in discrete mathematics | by Niiharika Panda

Show Tautology without Truth Table || Lesson 11 || Discrete Math & Graph Theory ||

Logical Equivalence with out using truth table examples or equivalent formulas examples

Proving logical equivalence involving the biconditional

Using a Truth Table to Prove a Tautology #logicalreasoning #truthtable #tautology #maths

Show that [(ptoq)^^(qto r)] to ( p to r)is a tautology | 12 | MATHMETICAL REASONING | MATHS | C...

Proofs with Rules of Inference 1 (Propositional Logic for Linguists 15)

Discrete Mathematics | Unit-1 | Video - 11 | Tautology Using equivalence Laws | Tamil

Proof by Contradiction | Method & First Example

Conditional Statements: if p then q