How to be a GOOD Listener - Jordan Peterson

#JordanPeterson #JBP

Video Tags: Jordan Peterson, JBP, Jordan Peterson on religion, Jordan Peterson 2022
Jordan Peterson Sam Harris, Jordan Peterson free speech, Jordan Peterson debate, Jordan Peterson destroys, Jordan Peterson Tour
Jordan Peterson interview, Jordan Peterson lecture

[BrotherTree]

And adding in something like "and correct me if I'm wrong or missed something important". That takes it to another level of trust. And of course, requesting for the person to treat you a similar/same way in return as they listen to you and they oblige out of mutual benefit, then you have a pretty solid relationship right there.

[alpinecountryclub]

I love people and I am excited about this and hoping that I can use it to help people feel loved and cared about.

[animeoeshonikako]

My ex had adhd, and he would be the one constantly talking every day. It was so bad to the point where I would be just the listener and say nothing because I knew he would just talk over me again. I tried to communicate to him multiple times about the issue, and instead of trying to fix it, he would just blame it on his adhd and do nothing to improve. Thanks to that awful experience, I have to say being an active listener constantly is extremely draining, both mentally, and emotionally.

[jimmock]

Most people have to desire to truly hear the other person. Man, they love to talk about themselves tho!

[juliaward]

Also great sales technique😁 customers feel like you’re personally interest in helping them.. something like they are going shopping with best friends!

[tinahoward]

May God fill your life any your family with so much joy and love that your heart overflows. So much love & good vibes from Kentucky!

[hermesth]

“Then they can rely on you to be a reliable listener!” Perfect.

[Dulyman]

So you’re saying that I need to offer syntheses?

[dphilly]

It can't be good that it took me 3 tries to fully pay attention to a video about paying attention to people...

[Broonzied]

Truly listening for any length of time can be exhausting.

[shareefajehan]

Ik how fuck up I am, that I'm not a good listener. I try to, I guess I just don't have enough practic like I am so looong to alone that I am glad Inhave someone to talk to T.T

And I know I am the problem that why My friends leave me...

[allexramsey]

My synthesis of your recent diatribe is paramount. ❤️🙏😇

[balrajmaan]

My go to guy to psycho stuff especially suicidal men. Very clever Man, God bless you for your work. 👳🏾‍♂️🙏🏽

[parapacem]

Didn't work so well with Newman, did it?

[gamezswinger]

However listening to others is difficult for the person with an attention deficit—the person with a poor working memory…

[OdditiesandRarities]

but Jordan peterson himself is not a very good listener. If you listen to his show, he interrupts people WAY too much. To the point where he disrupts the conversation flow quite often.

[WhatWhy]

Watched twice cause I wasn't listening 😉

[NibberKSmooth]

No one listens, everyone has to talk.

[szeamusc]

Peterson is guilty of his own waffle. He should listen to Kenneth William's for more erudite and stylish presentations.

[paulh]

"Orwell flat-out says that anybody who evaluates the merits of socialist policies by the personal qualities of socialists themselves is an idiot. Peterson concludes that Orwell thought socialist policies was flawed because socialists themselves were bad people. I don’t think there is a way of reading Peterson other than as extremely stupid or extremely dishonest" quoted from "The intellectual we deserve" by Nathan J Robinson, also this -"(The old expression “what’s new in it isn’t true, and what’s true isn’t new” applies here.)" When talking about Petersons book - "Maps of Meaning".
Has Jordan Peterson judged other socialists by his own character?
Anyhow, back to my thoughts(note I read Nathan J Robinsons article after  listening to Peterson interrupting Sam Harris right before Sam excluded Petersons thoughts from having authority in the conversation).
Peterson is the Conservatives intellectual.
Conservative being made the enemy of progression not just its definitional opposite, now we have the best tool, with the internet for true transparency a conversation that has not only already been had, but it's resolved.
He's now trying to help the losing side of the argument keep it's authority, whilst he knows the gullible, will believe what they're told, he's using sophistry to give his words authority(like a preacher)and it's byproduct being donations from his now congregation, seem more than welcome, well, he does laugh whilst bragging about monetizing the "social justice" warriors.

Now to the ARGUMENT! (I miss Christopher Hitchens)
Faithful folk shouldn't have any authority in the West when governing the masses. Real Western Patriots(factious disturbers) shouldn't give their words credence or propagate them too, It's regressive to progression.

Nathan Robinson didn't need to point too religion being a factor, he was not only being PC, but he had his own examples, I only have online debates for reference.
Religion is a choice and if you chose faithful logic when it's not going to progress the conversation, you're disqualified from that conversation so the conversation can progress and not regress.
Rather than do the honourable thing, and agree, Peterson has gone the complete other way.  200 other intellectuals wrote a letter wanting his removal as an educator, for a reason.
(I personally became a criminal for remaining silent(at 40), spent 5 day in HMP Durham to cool off after 2 days police custody).
He's claiming "nowhere in British Common law history has there been compelled speach", completely ignoring any progressive/regressive legislation.
Should the gays and transsexuals just create another religion to save all the fuss about their equal rights? Or should we stop giving religious folk any considerations? Like take their organisational tax exemption away, or allow any religious political influence at all? You know, as religions are a choice, like the religious folk claim sexuality is.