The Shortest Victoria 3 Review I'm Legally Allowed to Make

#shorts #victoria3

Victoria 3 is alright, but it's a bit shallow, maybe intentionally so.

[stevesmithy]

the price of DLC is free if ye be a sailor of the seven seas

[draketurtle]

The idea of America banning slavery and the south being like “I thought they were joking but they done it… well shit we can’t do anything now” is just hilarious.

[ThisIsSrsBsnsMan]

“Paradox games are just frameworks for DLCs” is on point

[victorconway]

"Win the war on drugs on the side of drugs"
CIA meta

[jayphilipps]

this is the citizen kain of YouTube shorts

[HomsianCam]

As a proud Syrian, and a proud Victoria 3 player.. I confirm this message

[Chaos_Cultist]

When the game first came out your generals could teleport with their armies

[thegamingbrick]

One time I was in Africa fighting from a Dutch colony with no enemies and my soldiers were being pushed back on the offensive by NO ONE

[witheringgaming]

So accurate. I’ve played 40 hours and this is the best definition I’ve found so far

[ironbloodxiii]

"The south was too bitch-made" lmao

[nobody_expects_me]

The biggest misconception about this game is about capitalism. In fact, you cannot simulate a capitalist society, and it will be always a planned economy, since you control everything from methods of production to the buildings themselves.

[Frenchman]

As a man who cracked the game I see that as an absolute win

[CS-sznv]

But did you know that the Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy, Roman, nor and Empire?

[BigBeakEntertainment]

this is the Elden Ring of comment sections

[EgnachHelton]

To be honest, only raw Laissez faire triple-down economics works in this game. The welfare and wage system in this game is somewhat broken. Capitalists seem to maximize not minimize the wages of the workers, so when you have no incentive to provide welfare to your citizens. And when you do that, it would only make your factories less profitable and break your economy.

[ShiftySheriff]

The thing is, the economy isn't even that great either. Sure if you wanted a screen where you just build endless factories it's fine, but it most definetely is not an economic simulator. For example every nations economy plays the same. You want a Laissez-faire heaven with the US? Well too bad, since you're economy is just as planned as that of the Soviet Union. You want interventionism? Planned economy again. Every eceonmy is basically a Communists wet dream. The same goes for politics. In Victoria 2, you just couldn't outlaw slavery without support of the people. In Victoria 3 you click on outlawing slavery, click a few rng based events and tada 80% of times, you outlawed slavery by 1838. It's just not a good game. And saying it's the basis for a good game, is an overstatement.

[mythicalrp]

It would've been much easier if they actually included the actual simplified war mechanic based on hoi4 but they didn't

[OldSlimJolo]

1.5 was first version that felt like an improvement, with 1.7 coming out on monday it is starting to feel like the actual content that SHOULD have been in the base game from the start at launch. At 1.0 game was clearly unfinished and I think the compromised broken mil system is still evident of that, lol. The biggest thing they could do to bring life back to the game is scratch their failed mil system and give us back some sort of stacks, I feel.

[ethanlightning]

i have never seen any of your videos but subscribed just from how funny this one was. 😂😂😂

[Aarlaeoss]

I would hardly call the game capitalistic. Every state is a command economy