Propositional Logic: (not-A) or B

preview_player
Показать описание

This video shows how disjunctions written in the form "(not-A) or B" are logically equivalent to conditional claims of the form "if A then B".
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

thanks for that video. i believe the "either" form doesnt really work though, because A v B is also true if both A and B are true

qwerty
Автор

OK, summary:
return !A || B;
===
if (A) { return B; } else { return true; }

playrix
Автор

This would be MUCH easier explained with Vinn Diagrams. You're suggesting the antecedent is contained within or is a component part of the consequent.
Paris is contained within France.
The game is component part of the Championship.
Gas is contained within a car.
With that understanding, if you cross out the antecedent and state OR the consequent, you can visually see the either/or relationship. For me, this explanation works better than the logic table.

UniversalPotentate