Explanation of Implication

[mkjav]

Most intuitive explanation of implication I've ever come across. Boatloads of gratitude

[jesvinpalatty]

The Best Explanation I could find so far, Thank You Sir

[shankysays]

Thanks. This is the only video i could find where the instructor himself/herself was not confused during the explanation. So eloquent. Wasted half an hour. Finally got the understanding in 5 minutes from here.

[kaiserhhaie]

Thank you so much! German University Students would be toast without Indians xD

[xphorm]

This is a bit more complicated explained than it could be. Here's a quote from another site: "Remember that "implies" is equivalent to "subset of". It works in exactly the same way: "if an element is in the subset (e.g A), it MUST also be in the superset (e.g. B)". By definition, it is impossible that an element is in the subset, but not in the superset. That's the P=1, Q=0; P=>Q = 0 case. In fact, "A ⊆ B" means that a ∈ A implies that a ∈ B. If a is not in subset A then you can't draw any conclusions on whether a is in the superset B. That's how I keep remembering it."

So understanding implications with unions is easiest (to me at least), and U, x, A and B is just mental gymnastics that is unneeded here.

[notrohith_]

Simplest most understandable video I've come across on logic gates. Thank you so much

[kimlin]

Thank you for the short and well explained video, the confusion you talked about was precisely what I struggled with.

[meshackgaolathe]

Bravo!!! Bravo!!! Such brilliant explantion.

[IsaacBarnor-ls]

Was so easy to understand. I like how he broke it down into simple terms.

[markconley]

this explanation should be played at the befinning of all implication lectures, thank you. will definitely subscribe, mark

[mdarman]

Bravo...such a brilliant explanation with less time 🎉🎉🎉

[cheepsss]

This video put a smile on my face. I also finally understood implication. 👑 --> you deserve this king

[ketann.]

Brilliant explanation! I looked up in many books still couldn't understand but you made me understand within the first 2 minutes of your video ! 🕺

[samyohanglimbu]

bro I've been tyring to understand this for 2weeks.
Finally found the right video.Without this video I would still be having confusion

[ksrajavel]

The best explanation from one of the best professors of DM

[tedioushugo]

Basically, when we derive a true, it is not a definite casual relationship. That's all about it.

[mariusenache]

Thanks for the great explanation! You are great teacher.

[sebastianllano]

Thank you! Your explanation made this concept understandable to me

[nhikiya]

wow such set explanations seeing for the first time

[spookyalaska]

Thanks a lot! I was struggling to understand this concept for some time. This explanation makes total sense.