Michio Kaku - The Universe Shouldn't Exist

Michio Kaku - The Universe Shouldn't Exist
Oct. 26, 2017

[midwaysilver]

that doesn't mean it shouldn't exist, it just means we don't know why it is the way it is

[JacobHayden]

I honestly lose how Michio literally gives a death stare into the camera with that smirk, and stands like a stachu. xD! I crack up every interview he does that.

[nancyvolker]

THE UNIVERSE SHOULDN'T"T EXIST!...OMG!...All I can say is I'm glad it does. LOL!

[Eclektc]

The genius Kaku pours out on a whim is so interesting. Wish he'd do more monologue type lectures for a lengthy amount of time.

[alberteinstein]

Anti-matter decays at a faster rate than regular matter.
At the time of the bigbang it didn't have time to annihilate all matter there for this is whats left.

[carlosantuckwell]

The reporter's first words say it all: "Scientists BELIEVE..." (end of story).

[GerryMorganprincipal]

May I offer an explanation... In string theory, sub atomic particles exist as specific architectures of strings coming together. We know that in a vacuum, things pop into existence and some stay and some disappear. If the string architecture holds a quark or sub atomic particle can exist. If not, it disengages and becomes strings again. This process of coming together is random. Every particle anti or otherwise has a natural life span and then disengages again back to it string base. Anti-matter sub particles are simply less stable than matter. They disintegrate back into strings more readily from where they came from. So you have a very elegant system. Strings make all particles...particles make protons, electron and neutron, neutrons make atoms, atoms combine to form all that we know in the physical world.
The big bang did not make matter and anti-mater...it just made strings which combine to form all things. Their geometries dictate their properties... The process after the big bang was intense due to the concentration of strings in a given volume. the same process occurs today. Matter does not spontaneously generate...it is formed from strings. So it was in the beginning and shall ever more be. The trick is to prove it. Remember, Occam's Razor.

[agustinsans]

Please do not get another interview with that journalist.

[kinglink]

How would we know this? We can't even observe a fraction of the universe-let alone enough of it to know that there isn't enough anti-matter for us to not be able to exist. Plus, we are still VERY much in the dark about the true nature of anti-matter.

[jaredprince]

The universe and its conjoined identical twin together had equal parts of matter and anti-matter. When they separated 13.7 billion years ago, one had a little more anti-matter while the other, our universe, had the same amount more of matter. We can't locate the missing anti-matter because it isn't in our universe.

[Mio_Azusa]

2:23 the classic seven-segment display I used studying digital electronics on a breadboard:-)

[scottcox]

This is when you know that physicists have something to learn, because the universe does exist

[TheImmortuary]

We looked for antimatter galaxies and havent found one? Exactly what does an antimatter Galaxy look like Michio?

[DP-hyvh]

Maybe the Big Bang was an asymmetrical explosion where some of the shock waves constructively interfered with each other, amplified into larger shockwaves, flipped the polarity and spin of some of the anti-matter and turned it into matter. That's the only thing that makes sense to me.

[unknown_]

Multiverse has the key. Antimatter is matter in a different dimension/the reality you live in.

[DiceDecides]

imagine if we one day found antimatter aliens and started interacting but we could never touch them in fear of explosion

[Roedygr]

That took four minutes to say we don't know why their is more matter than anti-matter in the universe.

[vidyaranyavijayapura]

It means origin of universe with big bang is wrong!

[zachariah]

The proof for a God of creation is the space outside of the source of creation, which causes scientists to go beyond their initial theory for the source of creation, The Big Bang Theory, into String Theory, which also has to account for the space around it in a very complex way.

It is the same concept that begs the question, if God created us, then who created God?

We view God as a physical being, existing within a physical space, because we are told we were created in His image. But, the Bible is saying we are created in the image of that which he chooses to physically manifest himself as.

God is not limited and confined to a physical form. His Spirit extends outside of space and time and all of creation infinitely.

When you think about God as being that space outside of the source of creation, it fixes all of the holes in every creation theory that has been proposed.

Albert Einstein insisted there must be a cosmological constant and God, Jesus Christ, Yeshua the Messiah, is that constant.

The last couple of tests conducted of CERN have indicated, in their own words, that, under their own theories, we should not exist.

There is supposed to be an overage of matter in the ratio of matter to antimatter, but there is perfect symmetry between the two.

Meaning, thus far, their own experiments have proved their theories to be wrong.

I just explained to you why.

[HammerLeaf]

Try to conceptualize what eternity is. If this is the beginning, you die, and there is an eternal afterlife, wouldn't you have already been dead since eternity has no beginning or end? Perhaps our understanding of the passing of moments has been skewed and bound to this dimension.