filmov
tv
Nuclear War - ALL Survival Zones on the Planet
Показать описание
World War III: Where to flee and where can we hide from it?
What if tomorrow is World Nuclear War III? Where to run to? In what countries will it be possible to hide from nuclear mushrooms and live quietly to a deep old age? We've spun the globe and compiled a list of the most dangerous and most suitable places for you.
Where not to go?
The main owners of nuclear weapons are the USA, Russia and China. In the format of "all against all" each of the countries will try to cause maximum damage to the others, and therefore it is better to get out of there urgently. There is no way out.
Europe will also become the target of nuclear warheads, so it will not work to sit in France with a glass of Chablis. In Germany with a mug of Bavarian and in Britain with a glass of whiskey will be exactly the same picture.
It is worth avoiding the countries where the maximum flow of refugees will go
It is also foolish to flee to countries where there are problems with water or food in peacetime, such as Pakistan or India.
There won't be any more food once World War III starts.
Especially since they also have nuclear weapons.
You can't count on regions where you have to win a place in the sun with a rifle in your hands. This is almost all of Africa - food and water are scarce, and the locals will not be happy about your arrival, unless cannibal tribes will welcome you with open arms.
Possible countries
Even if during World War III all nuclear charges are used up and each of them reaches their target, there will still be a lot of cities not affected by the bombing. And countries that do not have any strategically important facilities on their territory have nothing to fear.
The first option is the most promising
Uruguay, Chile, Argentina. Yes, Latin America will stay away from the main fronts of the Third World War. It is clear that there will be a dense flow of migrants from the U.S., and then, perhaps, even from Africa - from there people will be driven by hunger. But if you make it to the first wave, you have a chance to get a good job.
Most likely, there will be no serious problems with food and water in Latin America. You'll live happily the rest of your life writing the unhelpful memoir "Fugitive from Hell: How I Avoided World War III". At least you'll know how it ends.
Most experts believe that the currents in the Atlantic Ocean make it unlikely that contaminated seawater from the North Atlantic will come here. You can stay on the coast.
The second option is a severe decline in the standard of living
New Zealand, New Caledonia and island countries (Vanuatu and Fiji). Even after a nuclear strike there will probably remain the same paradise on Earth as it is now. Yes, the industrial level is quite low, but you can grow fruits and vegetables or fish. Not much will change for these countries - only the lack of supplies of modern equipment and materials from the big world will slowly lead to regression.
New Zealand is a separate conversation. If Australia is a member of many alliances and, most likely, will not avoid participation in the Third World, the "hobbit country" will remain neutral. Good-natured population, high level of development, abundance of food and water.
Of course, it has its problems - for example, high levels of solar radiation - but we are fleeing a nuclear war, not a vacation destination.
Indonesia and Papua New Guinea were originally on our list. But there is a serious problem with them - the economy of these states is maximally export-oriented, which allows them to maintain the current standard of living. After a blow, the economy will collapse and 261 million people will find themselves without food and livelihood. Do you need it?
The third option is to take a chance
You can take refuge in Europe, but you'll have to go to the least important places. Portugal, the Pyrenees in Spain, the Balkan countries. This option does not guarantee that you will not be covered by a cloud of radioactive fallout, but the chance of surviving a nuclear strike in Moscow or New York is much less.
We do not recommend Norway and Sweden, even if they defend their neutral status - you hardly need cold winters and fuel problems.
Of all the African countries, Morocco is the only one to choose. This is not a bad option if you want to immerse yourself in Islam.
There are probably other good options. You can search for them yourself with the help of a globe or a world map.
" The main thing to remember is: away from nuclear mushrooms, closer to a good climate and the ability to grow enough food.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
What if tomorrow is World Nuclear War III? Where to run to? In what countries will it be possible to hide from nuclear mushrooms and live quietly to a deep old age? We've spun the globe and compiled a list of the most dangerous and most suitable places for you.
Where not to go?
The main owners of nuclear weapons are the USA, Russia and China. In the format of "all against all" each of the countries will try to cause maximum damage to the others, and therefore it is better to get out of there urgently. There is no way out.
Europe will also become the target of nuclear warheads, so it will not work to sit in France with a glass of Chablis. In Germany with a mug of Bavarian and in Britain with a glass of whiskey will be exactly the same picture.
It is worth avoiding the countries where the maximum flow of refugees will go
It is also foolish to flee to countries where there are problems with water or food in peacetime, such as Pakistan or India.
There won't be any more food once World War III starts.
Especially since they also have nuclear weapons.
You can't count on regions where you have to win a place in the sun with a rifle in your hands. This is almost all of Africa - food and water are scarce, and the locals will not be happy about your arrival, unless cannibal tribes will welcome you with open arms.
Possible countries
Even if during World War III all nuclear charges are used up and each of them reaches their target, there will still be a lot of cities not affected by the bombing. And countries that do not have any strategically important facilities on their territory have nothing to fear.
The first option is the most promising
Uruguay, Chile, Argentina. Yes, Latin America will stay away from the main fronts of the Third World War. It is clear that there will be a dense flow of migrants from the U.S., and then, perhaps, even from Africa - from there people will be driven by hunger. But if you make it to the first wave, you have a chance to get a good job.
Most likely, there will be no serious problems with food and water in Latin America. You'll live happily the rest of your life writing the unhelpful memoir "Fugitive from Hell: How I Avoided World War III". At least you'll know how it ends.
Most experts believe that the currents in the Atlantic Ocean make it unlikely that contaminated seawater from the North Atlantic will come here. You can stay on the coast.
The second option is a severe decline in the standard of living
New Zealand, New Caledonia and island countries (Vanuatu and Fiji). Even after a nuclear strike there will probably remain the same paradise on Earth as it is now. Yes, the industrial level is quite low, but you can grow fruits and vegetables or fish. Not much will change for these countries - only the lack of supplies of modern equipment and materials from the big world will slowly lead to regression.
New Zealand is a separate conversation. If Australia is a member of many alliances and, most likely, will not avoid participation in the Third World, the "hobbit country" will remain neutral. Good-natured population, high level of development, abundance of food and water.
Of course, it has its problems - for example, high levels of solar radiation - but we are fleeing a nuclear war, not a vacation destination.
Indonesia and Papua New Guinea were originally on our list. But there is a serious problem with them - the economy of these states is maximally export-oriented, which allows them to maintain the current standard of living. After a blow, the economy will collapse and 261 million people will find themselves without food and livelihood. Do you need it?
The third option is to take a chance
You can take refuge in Europe, but you'll have to go to the least important places. Portugal, the Pyrenees in Spain, the Balkan countries. This option does not guarantee that you will not be covered by a cloud of radioactive fallout, but the chance of surviving a nuclear strike in Moscow or New York is much less.
We do not recommend Norway and Sweden, even if they defend their neutral status - you hardly need cold winters and fuel problems.
Of all the African countries, Morocco is the only one to choose. This is not a bad option if you want to immerse yourself in Islam.
There are probably other good options. You can search for them yourself with the help of a globe or a world map.
" The main thing to remember is: away from nuclear mushrooms, closer to a good climate and the ability to grow enough food.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
0:19:16
This Is How You Actually Survive a Nuclear Attack
0:11:03
How to Survive Nuclear War – What to Do – How to Prepare
0:11:11
What Happens AFTER Nuclear War?
0:29:54
I Survived 100 Days of NUCLEAR WAR (NOT Minecraft)
0:10:52
How to Survive* a Nuclear Blast
0:12:30
The First 20 Minutes of a Nuclear Attack Looks Like THIS... | Nuclear War Expert Annie Jacobsen
0:04:51
Nuclear War - ALL Survival Zones on the Planet
0:14:25
10 Myths About Nuclear War
0:07:00
Global Aftermath What if a Nuclear War Happens
0:16:44
Where to Move to Escape Nuclear War
0:19:33
I Tried A Nuclear War Simulation
0:13:48
What Would Life Be Like After a Nuclear Apocalypse?
0:14:27
Can You Survive Nuclear Winter?
0:03:35
Nuclear War AI Simulation - Russia vs NATO
0:05:47
World Nuclear War 3 AI Simulation - Russia, NATO, China, North Korea, France, UK
0:10:44
2 years after nuclear war: Who survives? | Annie Jacobsen and Lex Fridman
0:15:22
25 Things You Need To Do To Survive A Nuclear Attack
0:12:42
Surviving The First 24 Hours of Nuclear War
0:00:49
How to survive a nuclear blast when caught outside… #shorts #survival #war #russia #ukraine #learn
0:08:54
How A Nuclear War Will Start - Minute by Minute
0:04:46
Chances of Survival in a Nuclear War
2:11:42
Nuclear War Expert: 72 Minutes To Wipe Out 60% Of Humans, In The Hands Of 1 Person! - Annie Jacobsen
0:13:17
How Would the US & NATO Fight a Nuclear War?
0:34:35
I Survived 200 Days of NUCLEAR WAR (Not Minecraft)
Комментарии