Karen Read Murder Trial Explained | Jessica Benson Show

preview_player
Показать описание
Jess and Bennett talk through the shocking Karen Read murder trial. They give a rundown of everything you need to know and then talk about their own ideas of what might have happened on that fateful night in Boston.

#jessicabensonshow
----

~SOCIAL~

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Brian Albert was not retired at the time of the offense. It was after John’s death that he retired, moved and rehomed his dog.

castlecreekmanor
Автор

What a shit show this case is. The entire investigation or lack
Of investigation from start to finish

melissahanna
Автор

They never planned to pint it on Read but when she was out of her mind at the crime scene the opportunity presented itself. That is exactly why 8 of them met at that house later that morning.

EmJust
Автор

This is 1000% a case of a group of dirty cops eliminating the threat to their racket. I grew up near Canton and can affirm, those cops are corrupt af.

mwood
Автор

I’d like to know what the neighbors REALLY caught on their ring camera

EmmaDee
Автор

What got me was Higgins, after being told to preserve his phone, snapped the SIM card, and threw the phone and sim card away in separate dumpsters on a military base.

GamersOver
Автор

I don't know what killed John O'Keefe, but I can say beyond a reasonable doubt, to a moral certainty, it was NOT getting hit by a Lexus.

JayeEllis
Автор

All the cops were in on it. Full stop.

LegoMaster
Автор

She is innocent. I don't understand what is taking so long

trishahines
Автор

The biggest problems for the prosecution are the ones where the evidence disproves their own theory.

1. They firmly stood by their claim that Karen's vehicle taillight struck John. Experts explained how the human body cannot break the polycarbonate on that taillight. Maybe karen hurt john in some other way, who knows, but the prosecution stuck to its claim that karen broke her taillight on John's body. It's not possible.

2. The prosecution stuck to its claim that John was wounded at Fairview at 12:45. Karen's cell phone would have already been gone as she reconnected to John's wifi at 12:36. The prosecution couldnt adjust their timeline because there were people that would have seen Karen strike john before 12:45.

Yes, there is ALOT more, but in a court of law facts are what matter and these two items squash the ability to find her guilty.

Letsberealish
Автор

This is the best breakdown of the case I’ve watched ——and I’ve watched plenty specific to this case—— extremely well done!

rickmoncrieff
Автор

Proctor said horrible things about her. He claimed he was going to make sure she was guilty.

bornfree
Автор

It only takes a *player, * and a *ref.* to *”fix”* a championship.. NOT the whole team.

In the case of Karen Read, it only takes a
*”Proctor, ”* and a *”McAlbert, ”* …once the fix is in place, the rest will lead the way…

*SHE. WAS. FRAMED.*

LiLHarOak
Автор

Brian Higgins giving investigator Procter a hard drive of his phone texts after deleting chosen texts is an indication of guilt.

pAusten
Автор

Proctor (Trooper) Text with mates: Home owner will get heat? Proctor replied: Nope ... He's a Boston Cop too.

debrashawcross
Автор

Even if she isn't innocent, it sounds like negligence from the cops will make it impossible to do anything.

And it's far too coincidental to be true.

LikeMadCops
Автор

Jen McCabe is Brian Albert’s sister in law. 😂 her sis is married to Brian.

Nataliestar
Автор

Jen McCabe came up with the KR story!! The players in this story have not kept their mouths shut!! Colin is involved and has been in on the assault with BH!!

lynnmendoza
Автор

Criminal street gang investigates itself and concludes that nobody in the gang did anything wrong.

American law enforcement is a disgrace.

skepticalobserver
Автор

It doesn’t even matter if she’s guilty or not. They can’t prove that she did jt. There are too many questions and too much reasonable doubt. The cops are corrupt, they need to let her go

mrich