Evidence the Jury Did Not See in MA v Karen Read | Killer Or Cover-Up Murder Trial

preview_player
Показать описание
Could you track the phones of everyone that was at the Albert's house? Court TV's Vinnie Politan and experts analyze the evidence the jury did not see during MA v #KarenRead.

#CourtTV - What do YOU think?

Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:

FOLLOW THE CASE:

WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE 
HOW TO FIND COURT TV 
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The state didn’t prove that JO was hit by a vehicle. The defense doesn’t have to prove anything. There was so much reasonable doubt. That’s my opinion.

Gigi-wjgd
Автор

If I had cops and ambulance sirens and flashing lights and people screaming out the front of my house, I’d be out there in a second. I find it really strange that the Albert’s slept through it all.

jillmckay
Автор

imagine a body is found on the lawn and no police officer goes inside to investigate.

chrisclassical
Автор

I'd be afraid to live in a town of a group of drunk driving cops.

laurieoshea
Автор

The main conspiracy suspects got rid of their phones, a house and a dog. That’s the problem.

RPBSpeaks
Автор

"rehomed" the dog, destroyed phones, altered/destroyed videos, redid basement floor right before selling house, butt dials-butt answers, etc... the list of reasonable doubt is more than long enough!

vinnivanhood
Автор

Why is nobody discussing that there was NO SEARCH of the Albert's house. Notwithstanding that the crime scene was outside, any normal investigator would certainly have secured the house as a possible crime scene and done a thorough search of the house and all of the rooms of the house to eliminate them for being connected to the crime. This case screams COVER-UP and malfeasance by the police and investigators.

rm-dctx
Автор

Four medical experts stated injuries were not consistent with being hit by a vehicle, two accident reconstruction experts (with PHDs, hired by FBI/DOJ ) also stated the same. “You can't deny the science and the physics.” Unfortunately, people still do.

moehawken
Автор

I’m still shocked that the home owners of an officer never went outside of his home when another fallen officer found on his lawn???

kathybrown
Автор

The guest who said the WOUNDS were checked for dog DNA and that is 100%
Only the shirt was tested and showed PIG DNA!!! Pig is common as dog treats for big dogs, ie pig ears.
The investigation dropped the ball by not swabbing the wounds but for some unknown reason they did NOT swab the wounds!!!

nicolaxoxo
Автор

IMPORTANT: On day 22, Dighton Police Sgt. Nicholas Barros testified that there was only 1 piece missing from the cracked taillight when he arrived at the Read’s residence BEFORE the car was towed.

abeerali
Автор

House sold, phones/SIM cards destroyed, dog sent to another state, simultaneous butt dials, no ring cameras at all, perjured time lines?! WTH!
Apparently that jury was as blind as Casey Anthony’s.

sandibaker
Автор

1.All these buttdials, I might do 1 or 2 in a year, but NEVER in my sleep when the phone is on the nightstand.
2. All the destroyed phones.
3. Never searched the house of where a dead man is found.
4. Timelines dont match.
5. Trooper paul who is a clown.
6. Missing bodycams, videos.
7. Jen Mccabe that was aloud to check protocols before she answered any questions.
8. Changing stories from day 1- present day.
9. Picked up Karens car before finding any tail pieces.
10 Any more BS in this trial.

Even IF Karen did it, you cant convict her on these "evidence".

Not guilty and greeting from Sweden 🇸🇪

casualgamerdads
Автор

Pretty sure the experts proved he wasn't hit by a car...

lisasueroyer
Автор

Karens location data was DELETED AFTER HER CELL WAS IN POLICE CUSTODY

mamag
Автор

Why did all these people destroy their phones? Who does that unless you are hiding something? Why did no one search that house? Why did they sell the house several months after this happened? Why did they get rid of their dog? If these people didn’t do anything wrong why completely uproot your life.

catmom
Автор

I love how CourtTV gets a guy that didn't watch the trial and speaks of tracking phones. If he had followed the trial at all, he would know that the people it mattered also knew how to prevent their location being tracked.

Why did CourtTV even need this guy?

damonfinken
Автор

the irrefutable evidence is that the injuries are not consistent with a car accident

galeocean
Автор

Clearly weren’t paying attention. The defense tried getting everyone’s phone. Some got rid of their phones, everyone deleted a bunch of calls and everything else. That was part of the case! Omg

pjhaze
Автор

Did any of the people on the panel follow this trial? Higgins AND Brian Albert destroyed their phones and threw them away after they were told not to! The defense questioned all of them about the phone calls and texts that they were allowed access to. I think these people on the panel fail to understand that if the CW doesn't want the defense to obtain information that could hurt their case, Bev has zero issues telling the defense they can't have it. In pretrial, the defense had to fight for what phone records they actually were able to obtain from the McAlberts. Bev and Lally accused the defense of going on a fishing expedition when they requested the phone records.

heavymetalrehab