DeLand creates new policy against recording after ‘First Amendment auditor’ incidents

DeLand creates new policy against recording after ‘First Amendment auditor’ incidents

[JamesMadisonAudits]

Nothing people do with cops is private. It’s all public including their body cam.

[Randal]

Common sense says IF someone were recording & I reported a senstive crime, take them to a secure room. How hard is that.

[GripeGlobe]

Politicians can't legislate 1st Amendment rights away, but they sure waste taxpayer money on trying. Shameful.

[bigruss]

Your policy doesn't trump their right to record in public

[bigpapi]

Bait? 🤔 so doing a constitutionally protected activity it baiting? Dumb!!

[michaelhollingshead]

This policy is pure hypocritical. They can video us all they want anywhere they want but we can't video them. So much for accountability.

[jamesdavisjr]

The supreme court has already ruled on this numerous times and thus is a very slanted view by this news team

[hornetsnestmedia]

Here they go. Police lobbies, next the public sidewalk, next, everywhere.

[_profile_not_found]

Right, the old "baiting" claim. Because a police officer would NEVER violate or be ignorant of someones rights unless they were tricked into losing their temper

[jimmy]

Take the victim to an interview room or back room so they can sit & disclose information. Simple. This obviously doesn't overpower the Constitution, just a waste of time.

[FaithwalkerTodd]

Your Ordinance doesn’t supersede the constitution. If you’re worried about their privacy have a special room to take the initial information. You don’t have a right to infringe on the rights of others because you have not done your due diligence to protect privacy.

[dabzprincess]

An ordinance DOESN'T TRUMP LAW THIS IS AN UTTER RIGHTS VIOLATION

[DG-wuke]

If the public is allowed in then the press is allowed to be there

[bobz]

This will cost the tax payer's. Policy is not law.

[sbanks]

They can write all of the policies they want… but policies do not override our rights!

[eddie]

All the videos i seen on the internet, I have never ever seen anyones personal information posted. But I have seen police brutality and violence. Many videos of citizens rights being violated by sadistic bullies and thugs aka police officers. Also citizens tortured by police. Let’s not forget the citizens life’s ruined by abuse and incarcerated for nothing. They are the lucky ones, we have citizens murdered by overzealous ego driven police whose behavior is an exact copy of the NAZIS. Don’t forget the paralyzed and crippled with broken necks because some sadistic officer wanted to throw a handcuffed citizen to the ground. Now that cameras are bringing the truth to light the blue line gang wants to change the rights of the people and trash the constitution. You say they film with no reasonable purpose. Please see above. How much violence has been curtailed because a camera was present. No purpose? I don’t think so. Ask the citizen with the broken nose and broken neck. He’s in a wheelchair unable to take care of himself the rest of his life. WHAT HAPPENED TO INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY? STOP QUALIFIED IMMUNITY!

[johnnytenmin]

The news LITERALLY covering news about news being limited 🤣

[FrostNuke]

Sad that they are afraid of being recorded, im guessed the cops are doing something wrong or shady

[ioqiqws]

There is zero right to privacy in public. The end!

[gj]

People can tell the police they need to speak to them in private. They dont have to say anything private in the public lobby.