This is How They Actually Made Jumanji - FX Breakdown

preview_player
Показать описание

According to Robbin Williams, the word "Jumanji" is a Zulu word that translated into English actually means "Many Effects", whether this is actually correct or not, we don't know. However what do know is that the movie Jumanji did indeed have, Many Effects.

Like the music in this video? I made it!
Support me by getting it on any of these sites :P

Pushing the limits of what was possible for special and visual effects at the time, not only did Jumanji have more puppets and animatronics than Jurassic Park, but it also had over double the computer effects, more than 12 minutes! and a much wider variety of style of effects.
So, in this video, we're going to explore...
Some of those detailed models and sets, like the overgrown vine set or the house splitting in two, complicated puppets, animatronics, and... well, I suppose you'd call this "Plantatronics" and incredible digital effects!

...For this warping effect, ILM didn't actually have any proper scans or measurements of the actor's hands so they got the production company to send them a Xerox of the actor putting his hands on the photocopier's glass.
ILM even spent 3 months developing two ground-breaking software programs,
one was called iSculpt and was used to create realistic facial expressions
and the other was for creating realistic digital hair and fur for the awesome CG lion and these ... Ummm... not-so-awesome monkeys.
Designing the look for all the animals took months of research, hundreds of photographs, and numerous sketches before they managed to find the correct balance between amusing and threatening which was both wild enough to scare the audience and still tame enough to achieve a family-friendly rating.
The mantra for every movie is "Get as much in camera as you can" so during the design process they also had to assess which animal could be a physical puppet and captured "in camera", and which had to be CGI.
For example, animals that didn't have to move around too much, like the plants and the crocodile could be 100% animatronics, animals that had to have a wide range of movement, like the mosquitoes and the monkeys were 100% CGI, and animals that had to move around but also had close-up beauty shots or had to interact with the cast were both animatronics and CGI.

The lion was one of these digital/practical hybrids.
They built the lion with an animatronic head that could be controlled by external operators whilst the front paws were controlled by a creature performer.
This performer was concealed inside the lion and wore a headset with LCD screens in order to see how he was moving. the entire puppet was then supported by a crane on a dolly that it could be moved around on.
The animatronic lion was used for the close-up and the facial expression shots, and the CG version was used for the shots that required full body movement.
If you stop to look for it, you can actually see the transitions between the two quite clearly in this scene

We start with the animatronic model, here too, now it's CGI back to animatronics and back to CGI
Now here, if we slow it down, you can see just how good their new fur tool was.
There are around 1.5 million hairs individual on this lion and the two minutes of total screen time that the CG lion has, took 5 months to complete.
Now I know what you're thinking "if they were able to make this CG lion look so good, why did they leave these monkey's looking so bad?"
Well, the short answer is that, back when the movie was made, they just couldn't possibly make them look any better, and the main reasons for this were lighting, and reference.

For the lion scene, they had an animatronic puppet that they could use as a light reference on set, the scene also occurs inside the house under controlled lighting conditions.
This meant that even though there were parts of the lion (Like this rear leg here) that didn't quite sit right in the shot they could be hidden in shadow.
The monkeys though were a completely different story.
Even though maquettes were made to define the monkey's look, there was no puppet that they could use for light reference, and the monkeys themselves mainly appeared outdoors in broad daylight with little or no shadows to hide their flaws.

(...)



The above ActionVFX link contains a Special Fame Focus Discount. We also earn an affiliate percentage of each purchase.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

In my opinion, Jumanji 1995 will always be one of the legends.

sakinahafifah
Автор

I never had a problem with the monkeys in the movie. They had a weird look which blended in well with the overall weirdness of the movie.

ReallyBadDriving
Автор

Robin is one of the best performers of all time & will be deeply missed.

-darrell
Автор

This video stands as an important lesson in why it's always best to mix practical effects with CGI, whenever possible, as opposed to the modern tendency to rely almost exclusively on CG effects. The manner in which they shot the car being crushed practically and then added a CG elephant works marvelously. These days, filmmakers would almost certainly compose both the car and the elephant with CGI and as a result, the effect wouldn't look half as seamless.

Right_Said_Brett
Автор

A film made 27 years ago and animation holds its own even today

meenashetty
Автор

I adore Jumanji!!! Its one of very rare horror-adventure family-friendly classics!!!

And hell yeah, Cgi was way ahead of its time

NenadlPopovic
Автор

This gives me a new profound respect for film making. Absolutely miraculously how great the human imagination is!

Anfiyaah
Автор

A friend was able to take a few of us on a tour of the set at Bridge Studios, I remember looking close at the lion and being amazed at how realistic it was, incredibly detailed. The bookshelves all had signs on them saying remember this is make believe so don't put anything on them, and the underside of the shelves were all routed out resembling wormwood to break easier. Remarkably interesting to say the least. So many memories popped back watching this video, thanks for posting it!

WhiteRockBoy
Автор

One of my favourite and most nostalgic films from my childhood.
Incredible & very clever use of both CGI & Practical effects. I especially loved how they explained the cross-cutting between the miniature house and the torn rubber floorboards to create the illusion that the house was being split in two!

Darkstarproductions
Автор

The effects in this movie are much more convincing on a low-resolution VHS tape.

starkj
Автор

I think the subpar look for the monkeys actually works for the tone of the film. I think it gave them an uncanny look that suggested they were from some other realm. And it made them scarier.

RichardDuryea
Автор

I miss DVDs for this very reason. i always found behind the scenes footage and discussions to be fascinating. Now your lucky if production will give you a 5 min montage of the cast and crew smiling. And its hard to find any decent interviews that go into any depth.. This was great to watch!

KisDraga
Автор

As a Zulu native I can assure you that Jumanji absolutely does not mean "Many effects" .. its simply gibberish, it does not mean anything, as far as the Zulu language is concerned

Madiela
Автор

The amount of work that is done for just a couple scenes is incredible.

ihadanamebutitwasbadsonowi
Автор

Pretty impressive for nearly 30 years ago!

SunnyGirlFlorida
Автор

Hm... The "Anima" in "Animatronics" refers to animation, as in, bringing inanimate objects life. So I guess, it's still considered animatronics eve when it's plants. :)

jmalmsten
Автор

I don't think there's anything wrong with the monkeys, tbh. They don't detract from the viewing experience. ILM did a great job, as always!

j.lindback
Автор

A movie with very good computer effects for its time.

yabaniiybn
Автор

Jumanji was the best movie of that time with CGI

Abu-Hudhud
Автор

It’s not fah-kade.

It’s fah-sad. Façade.

kjamison
join shbcf.ru