Romans 11:11-15: How Should Christians View Jews? PART 1 with Dale Partridge

In this sermon, Pastor Dale Partridge explores the profound sovereignty of God over both good and bad events, emphasizing how even sin, punishment, and human disobedience are used by God for His redemptive purposes. Drawing from Romans 11, Pastor Dale explains how Israel’s rejection of Christ is neither total nor final, as God has preserved a remnant and continues to work through Israel’s hardening for the good of the Gentiles. He highlights that God’s sovereignty is not limited to the good but also encompasses the bad, showing that God is in complete control of all things, ultimately working everything for His glory and the good of those who love Him.

[richardhayward]

As both a Zionist and a full believer in the total sovereignty of God this sermon is the best teaching of Romans 11 I have ever encountered. Thank you brother!

[Over-for-now]

If God gave up HIS promises and everlasting covenant with HIS chosen remnant of Jews in the future, He would give up on us, we ARE no better than unfaithful Israel

[rogerbeaird]

Paul was not one of the twelve desiples either the messiah said he would build his church on Paul

[SpotterVideo]

Romans Chapter 11: In its New Covenant context... There is no Plan B of salvation outside of the New Covenant Church in this passage. Plan A is found in verses 23 and 24.

In Romans 1:16 Paul said the Gospel was taken "first" to the Jews. This time period can be found in Matt. 10:5-7, and Acts 10:36-38, and Gal. 1:14-18. Many try to claim God never gave the Jews a chance to accept Christ, so there must be some Plan B of salvation before or during the Second Coming of Christ. Romans 1:16 proves they are wrong, since Paul said the Gospel went "first" to the Jews. Many ignore the fact that Peter addressed the crowd as "men of Judea", and as "men of Israel", and as "all the house of Israel" on the Day of Pentecost, when about 3, 000 Israelites accepted the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary. The Gentiles were not grafted in until several years later. This passage proves Paul was right about the Gospel being taken "first" to the Jews.

Were all of the Israelites "partially" hardened in Romans 11, or were part hardened and another part were not hardened? The answer is found in the "remnant" of Romans 11:5.

Paul reveals two different groups of Israelites in Romans 9:6-8. There is an Israel of the promise, and an Israel of the flesh. This is part of the context of Romans 11.
Paul speaks about the "remnant" of Israel in Romans 9:27. This is also part of the context of Romans 11.

Paul starts Romans 11 with two different groups of Israelites. In verse one Paul reveals he is still an Israelite, even after his conversion. Then Paul refers to two different groups of Israelites during the time of Elijah. There were the Baal worshippers, and there was the faithful "remnant". In verse five Paul says there is also a faithful "remnant" of Israelites during his time. This must be the Israelites who have accepted Christ, as on the Day of Pentecost.
Paul uses the two olive trees as a symbol of the New Covenant Church made up of believing Israelites, and believing Gentiles grafted together into the same tree. The unbelieving Israelites have been broken off but can be grafted back in through faith in Christ in verses 23-24.

Verse 26 is the problem for many modern Christians. What does the verse actually say, and how is it changed by many in the modern Church.

I have heard two of our nations famous preachers say the following.
"And then all Israel will be saved..."

I have heard another say the following.
"And all Israel will be saved..."

What does God's Word, recorded by the Apostle Paul actually say?

Rom 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

The English word "so" is translated from the Greek word "houto", which is an adverb of manner, instead of an adverb of timing. Some have changed the word from "so" to "then", in order to change the meaning of the verse.

How will all of the "remnant" of Israel from Romans 9:27 be saved? The answer is found in the verses that precede verse 26 and are found below.

Rom 11:23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again.
Rom 11:24 For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree?

Paul quoted from the OT in referring to the Deliverer coming out of Sion to pay for sin. Did this happen at Calvary, or will Jesus die again for His people in the future?
Rom 11:27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.

Verse 28 can only be understood by looking at how Paul started the passage. He started with two different groups of Israelites and he ends the passage in the same way. There are two different groups of "they" in verse 28. One group of "they" reject Christ and are the enemies of God, and another group of "they" are the election which accept Christ through hearing the Gospel and faith.

Rom 11:28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.

Based on Luke 21:24b-28, the times of the Gentiles comes to fullness at the Second Coming of Christ. This agrees with what Paul said in Romans 1:16 about the Gospel going “first” to the Jews.

[rogerbeaird]

Dude there is only one covenant remember the arch of the covenant also remember all your bible hereos converted to be a Jew also there has never been a gentile prophet pauls letters are just that letters not scripture

[emilybrereton]

After only 2 min the problem starts. If Augustinian election were “why only some Jews were the remnant”, then the part that was not elect rejected Jesus. you say the part that wasn’t elect had rejected Jesus and were “not elect”. Well, to be consistent in Calvinism, there is no possibility that anyone can reject Gods choice, and the Old Testament calls Abraham’s descendants Gods chosen people. Gods will is what happens every time in Calvinism. So there could be no one that Jesus offered himself to who rejected him. But if we read the Bible we can see people do reject Gods will. Gods will is that all would be saved. No where in the Bible does it say there is a “hidden will” of God. Scripture says Jesus came for all/the world. But Calvinists say His secret/hidden will was only for the elect. That would make God a liar.

[rogerbeaird]

YESHUA HAMASHIAC 🔯 the king of Israel he's not a Christian and don't keep Sunday check that

[ezzafive]

You wouldn’t even have a Bible if not for the Jews. This video is really bad. JC himself was an Orthodox Jew.

The real messiah will build the temple, usher in an era of world peace and knowledge of God will cover the earth. JC did none of these things.