BIG LAWSUIT VICTORY FOR IILLUMINAUGHTII

preview_player
Показать описание

The judge has finally ruled on Oz Media and Felix the KitKat's Motions to Dismiss Blair the iilluminaughtii's bogus lawsuit and the decisions are not what we were expecting to see! Madcaster breaks down the decisions issued by the judge for both Oz Media's Motion to Dismiss the iilluminaughtii lawsuit and Felix the KitKat's Motion to Dismiss the iilluminaughtii lawsuit.

Blair aka iilluminaughtii is suing Oz Media, Wonderstruck, and Felilx the KitKat for breach of contract and defamation. Blair aka iilluminaughtii alleges that Oz Media, Wonderstruck, and Felix the KitKat violated their confidentiality agreements while employed by Blair and that the videos and social media posts made by Oz Media, Wonderstruck and Felix the KitKat make statements that iilluminaughtii believes are defamation. Madcatster has the exclusive court documents so buckle up and let's go!

iilluminaughtii tried to foreclose on Oz Media, but Oz Media held a live stream fundraiser and the donations poured in, smashing Oz Media's $10k goal by almost 5 times! Now Blair the iilluminaughtii's shocking act of revenge against her former partner has been thwarted.

iilluminaughtii has been criticized by a number of YouTube creators, including Legal Eagle, plus former members of the Sad Milk group, such as One Topic, The Click, Oz Media, and Wonder or Wonderstruck. iilluminaughtii has been described by some individuals as a difficult, abrasive, and an unpleasant person. iilluminaughtii also has been accused of plagiarizing some of her video content. The iilluminaughtii's villain arc continues.

Join the MadCatster channel :

#iilluminaughtii #ozmedia #madcatster
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I can't help feeling like judges who have no concept of how information and discourse are transmitted in the present day should not preside over cases like this.

ssaberwolf
Автор

I think at this point, in freaking 2024, it is ridiculous and unacceptable that judges without any youtube literacy preside over cases centering around youtube.

angiep
Автор

The fact that I'm commenting on this video is proof that this is public interest

Beforecommonsarah
Автор

I feel like she has been given so much preferential treatment by this judge. It is ridiculous and has me wondering about judicial bias.

DrKikiV
Автор

How is the fact that the public is enthusiastically helping him raise money for his defense not a sign that this is definitely in the public interest?

FireMageLayn
Автор

This just reeks of a judge who either has potentially compromising bias towards Illuminaughti for whatever reason, or simply has no comprehension of social media and the internet.

MaddestRaven
Автор

How can anyone trust a legal system that won't even take its own orders seriously. "This needs to be done by X" doesn't submit in time, "Accepted even though you didn't follow my orders"

Krosa_Kaine
Автор

Tommy C got off lucky when Blaire just went into his account and deleted all the videos with her in it. Jesus Christ this woman is evil.

Shatterstar
Автор

I think the reason the judge thinks the anti-SLAPP doesn't apply is due to a base misunderstanding of YouTube and social media and its place in the public realm. Pretty common with the older folks in power, they really don't get modern technology.

Ravuun
Автор

I'm a research librarian for a law firm who does basic recon on judges and opposing counsel, and my hunch is this judge is old as dirt or at least completely out of touch with the current cultural zeitgeist. He doesn't seem to understand many of the references and appears to view Blair as some kind of damsel in distress who needs protecting from these mean, mean boys. Unfortunately, Colorado is notoriously stingy with court docs and I can't go beyond what's authorized by my firm, so I really appreciate these reviews, @madcatster!!!

shanobi
Автор

36:42 If the judge can't tell that:
- These are two DIFFERENT CHANNELS covering different matters
- He wasn't employed then

I question the judge's competency at his job. In what world does an NDA cover conversations made prior to employment????

nerdoftheatre
Автор

If this isn't a SLAPP suit Blair's using to silence people, then *nothing* is. And now I'm going to be changing an OC's name bc the name "Blair/Blaire" has been entirely ruined for me.

I do so hope that Blair sees one day just how horrid she's been acting and rectifies it before someone else does it. I do not wish ill or death on her, but there are others out there who would prefer to serve justice themselves, and I hope she's able to save herself from this before it's too late.

Regardless of her current actions, however, it is clear that whether or not she wins, she is no longer credible on the internet. I do hope that whatever occupation she finds following this, it is not to be managing data or information, leading other people, or doing research, as she has made it quite clear that she cannot be trusted with any of those.

Do not go and harrass her, do not harm her, and do not interact with her. She is so full of herself right now that it will only cause pain, whether to you or to her. Just step away from the glass and do not give her the attention that she is craving.

I am so, so sorry to Oz, Click, Wonder, and Felix, and I do so hope that you four make it out of this alive. I wish all four of you good luck.

And to Blair. Shame on you.

Radar_Chaos
Автор

I'm still so lost as to how the judge doesn't dismiss against Felix. It's like you said there's two different dates. How can a judge get this simple piece of information disastrously wrong? 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂

PochiCA
Автор

I hope the Blairch has to pay back every penny of the legal expenses of every defendant. And I hope she gets fined for abusing the law to bully people.

The_real_Arovor
Автор

Oz said that Sad Milk was under a different company, not Blair's. Something like Wet Socks LLC.
He has receipts.

winged
Автор

Blair cut and pasted those NDAs from the internet just like she cut and pasted her scripts from wikipedia

ssaberwolf
Автор

The judge’s lack of knowledge about YT is frustrating.

ClassicHognog
Автор

So... as some one who is familiar with employment tax law...if she is claiming Felix was an "employee" before she reported him officially as a legal, W2 employee (or at least when he accepted any terms of employment since its being reported that he wasnt hired on to his knowledge until a few months after the exchange) and being required to sign an employee NDA...I sure hope she has the records of filing and/or paying those employment taxes and forms from the beginning of this new start date! Otherwise, she's (yet again) screwing herself over by saying he was an employee months before she actually hired him on...

MiaMeeLove
Автор

The problem with Felix's dismissal is they didn't argue half the facts you brought up. They DIDN'T mention he didnt sign the nda later, or any of the other things. His lawyer is not doing their job

FluxDeimos
Автор

Okay I do Not agree with the leeway the judge is giving Blaire. It's honestly ridiculous! I can't get my head around how she's getting this far with such rubbish in her complaints! Thanks for the amazing update, Catster!

theminxiekitten
visit shbcf.ru