Paladins Vs Barbarians | Quick Test

Aren’t these just self-explanatory?

[sandy-jxqx]

I personally think that being shirtless in the cold mountains is not a good idea

[nikhilmaurya]

Barbarians good at attacking
Paladins good at stalling
And that blazing gem line is
*No man should have this power*

[ЯНезнаю-щж]

Paladins are good at very long stalling strong enemies. Barbarians against weak enemies. You can place paladins in front of barbarians so they can throw axes and if someone sneak from paladins they'll get destroyed by barbs.

[Voduke]

Sometimes you need some stalling power but not that much, which is where Barbarians excel. They stall for you but you’ll benefit from upgrading them to get more damage as well. Paladins are good for pure stalling power.

[keithnoir]

the barbs are also much better against rats or true damage enemies that will instakill your units no matter what because they have a faster respawn rate. Besides that generally if you have a tank hero you can have the luxury to get a barbarian hall, if you play a ranged or dps hero it's safer to stick to paladins, also cause their paladins must-have upgrades are cheaper

[IA-hhsn]

They should make game called Kingdom Rush descendants, where you play as the Hero's descendants and try to take back the kingdom from veznan

[ntlol]

Im gessing you recorded this audio in a car 🤣🤣

[mujtabaomar]

Their better for different reasons
Paladins for stalling
Barbarians for damaging
Combined together they mess up the enemy real good!

[coolfloppa]

Paladins and barbarians are good. One can not be better then the other it just depends on what strat you are using.

[delfinjrmacapagal]

Paladins have great armor, area attack and can heal themselves.
Barbarians have low armor but has greater health and attack than paladins and they can have ranged attack.

I would prefer Paladins specially if there are enemy that deals a lot of damage like dark knights, dark slayer etc. and I would usually use them to levels that have enemies with ranged attack like shadow archer, swamp things and necromancer because they can heal themselves and can endure many attacks, and I would use Barbarians to levels that spam squishy and flying enemies like in the level "ruins of acaroth" because of goblins so I can easily break through swarms of them.

[SunlessSage]

Alright, time to get my calculator going!

You can't really compare Blazing Gem and Barbarians since they're totally different towers. (But I'll try!) Barbarians get insane DPS and have melee attacks, aoe attacks and ranged attacks. Blazing Gem has an enormous DPS when given a couple seconds, aoe upon killing enemies and an instakill.

To keep this comparison simple, we'll ignore aoe (since that relies on a defined amount of enemies stacked up, and Barbarians do their aoe as a possible counterattack), instakill (since that gives infinite DPS), armor and magic resistance. We'll assume the barbarians are unkillable and we're facing a singular enemy. We'll also assume the blazing gem is firing at the maximum charged up strength.


Blazing Gem:
Blazing gem's max damage ranges from 70-105 (all general upgrades unlocked). With these upgrades, there's also a chance of 10% for each hit to deal double damage. This will be added in later.

The firing rate of the blazing gem is every 0, 4s. This would result in a DPS of 175-262, 5. However, there is still that double damage chance, if we attack every 0, 4 seconds this means we do 2, 5 attacks/second. Since we deal double damage once in every ten (on average) attacks, we trigger this every 4 seconds. This means we get 70-105 bonus damage/4s or 17, 5-26, 25/s. So the blazing gem has an astonishing DPS of 192, 5 - 288, 75.


Barbarians:
If we want to calculate the barbarian DPS we need to discover what mode deals how much damage: Throwing axes and melee. I'll calculate for each individual barbarian first, then multiply it all by 3 in the end.

Every 3.5 seconds a barbarian can throw an axe, at max level these deal 54 - 62 damage. This gives a DPS of 18 - 20, 67. It's also possible for axes to hit nothing, which would result in an even lower value.

In melee, a fully upgraded barbarian will deal 46-54 damage, with an attacking rate of 1, 37s (1, 67 on flash, which will be ignored for this comparison.) This gives us a DPS of 33, 58 - 39, 42. This means melee is way better compared to the throws.

So 3 barbarians would have a DPS of 100, 73 - 118, 25 or 154, 73- 180, 25 with throwing axes included (assuming all axes hit their target). That's not bad at all.

Conclusion:
Blazing gem has a way better DPS if given time to charge up, otherwise barbarians will outdamage it easily. Which one is best changes heavily depending on the situation.

If you see a calculation error, feel free to correct me. :)

[Wandusia]

"Who are the barbarians"
"Non-romans, said the romwns being invaded by non-romans

[timezone]

Just checked the wiki for both blazing gem and Barbarian halls
Yes DPS of blazing gem is 64(no amplification upgrade) and Barbarian halls is 62 (max thowing axe upgrade) so it is safe to blazing gem has the highest dps
PS: with amplification it goes up to 96

[hantenguuppermoon]

Sir Gerald Lightseeker vs Ingvar Bearclaw
Basically a super Paladin vs a super Barbarian

[burgerfanman]

Proof Morgan is communist: "Paladins are really good at Stalin"

[sergioamaya]

the barbarians have the best dps and the paladins are the best stallers, if you only use barbarians thy porbably die quickly to heavy armored enemies and dead troops are not good at stalling(sad necromancer noises), and if you only use paladins you are gonna have enemies leaking in the defense forcing you to have more paladins or a artillery building near, but if you mix both, the paladins in front and the barbarians on the back, you are gonna have a MONSTER, the first enemies that come are gonna get stalked by the paladins, while being heavy bombarded by the barbarians axes, and if the enemies are too much the barbarians are gonna be a perfect crowd control for the paladins avoiding leaks on enemies, truly one of the most powerful combos EVER.

[burgerfanman]

Paladins are better at tanking more powerful enemies that are lower in numbers, while Barbarians are good at taking hordes of lower-level enemies

[dnqxt_df]

X Tower is much better than Y tower

- The guy that uses sorcerer's against spiders

[Shape]

who care who's better
but you all gotta agree they are satisfying to watch

[IA-hhsn]

The one thing barbarians are good at is killing enemies which have snuck past your defences