Why is Modern Art so BAD? | Lowest Standards of Modern Art or It's All Up to YOU?

#modernart #art #modern
Hello Everyone! Welcome back to my channel!
Today I'd like to show you some examples of modern art, which I'm not a really huge fan of, simply because this art is too simple and kinda ugly, but yet, it rises a question in my mind: Why is modern art so bad?

At the same moment, after analyzing some art works, you might get to the conclusion that modern art is not about something particular, rather than its more about your personal vision of it, and it is basically up to you to understand, feel and interpret modern art works.

I have to say, that I do love digital modern art, which I find very fascinating, as well as modern sculpture.

Here is my video from very interesting Modern Sculpture Garden in NJ:

And here is my video from recent digital art installation in NYC:

And one more to check out - Immersive Van Gogh experience:

Thanks a lot for your time!
Please LIKE, SUBSCRIBE & SHARE!

[ervinslens]

Interesting topic bud, you elaborated this masterfully! Love this upload 👌👌

[Romanian.landscapes]

Good question friend, i don`t know, I am stuck and stagered at the art in the renaissance. I can`t figure it out how it went so sideways. 😁

[irinaarbatova]

Каждое пространство имеет место быть, соответственно наполняемость его различно. Но ощущение, что Модерн арт сегодняшний - это опустошение, минимализм, обесценивание прекрасного, безидейность интересного. От этого и пустые залы. Не хотелось бы такой пустоты вокруг и такого мировоззрения опустощенных людей. Такое надо показывать, чтобы украшать, наполнять светом, теплом, красотой и получать новое интересное пространство.

[sickle]

The answer is, no standards and no competition always leads to low quality results.

[jean-pierredevent]

Indeed, as said there it's sometimes too simple. I feel good art should be layered. It should have something aesthetic and technically masterful and then some meaning, a message too. Beauty without any message tends to be kitsch.
In the past on top of that, an easy accessible layer, some pleasure was present allowing for direct appreciation. A fugue was perhaps be very complex and but anyone could always hear at least some melody. Now, there is a purer art. The artist doesn't have to please and doesn't try it (it seems ;-))
Technically it's a bit poor. The art is often almost reduced to the message. But the problem is that we are today all educated and we can think too. We too, have already thought about the vastness of space or the meaning of life. So even that message seems often a bit cheap or fake. I don't see why even today all those layers from the past couldn't be present anymore.

[AnyaHALIANA]

good night cool amazing very nice, thanks for sharing very good and cool I enjoy it happy working successful and healthy always for you guys amen I support forever thank you guys full support💯✅💝 waiting for the next video💞🤝🤝🙏🏿💝

[endlessstudent]

Another atempt to explain modern art and make us believe that it is anything but superfluous. Just put something ugly up, make a story up that sounds deep, like social problems or environmental topics then say it is art. Bullshit. Historically art has portrayed life and was done by masters of the medium, who proved that they can do something (sing, paint, acrobatics etc.) that few else people can do. That is art. Nowadays any dumb brick can put up some nonsense. If is looks good, it cannot be modern uglier the better. If it looks like someone has vomited 20 pizzas, perfect....if it looks like even a 8 year old child would be ashamed of producing it....wonderful. But in no cirmcumstance should it be painted well, reflecting actual mastery, or sound good...than it is not art. Modern art is a mockery, nothing else. Well, ther are exceptions of course....but they have less and less success, because lets not needs to be ugly.