Turkic Tribes Vs Vikings Kiev Siege Edit

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Khergit Khaganate declared war on Kingdom of Nords.

carlpilkington
Автор

The feeling of regret when you learn that the Turks never retreated.

furkanarslan
Автор

Two excellent shots here:
- javelin throw at 0:32; pay attention how heavy it was.
- lance thrust at 0:45; excellent example of range advantage.
We rarely see movies with such amount of weapon-realism.

wojciechm.
Автор

Being a Viking does not prevent you from dying under the Turkish sword.

tolgaozcelik
Автор

Who in their right mind would chase a nomadic force on foot? Even chasing them with cavalry was a big mistake, they literally committed a medieval suicide lol..

ggoddkkiller
Автор

Thats an accurate Mount&Blade gameplay depiction 👍

alex
Автор

they depicted vikings as civilised while nomads as some sort of cave man in this movie but Khazars were already established cosmopolit empire when Rus started their raids

ayhanfedai
Автор

I'm Başkort say hello to all turks! 🐺𐰌𐰈𐰼𐰄‏‎🐺

bitterman
Автор

If you are chasing down the Turks retreating it means you are running directly to the hell.

alibak
Автор

Turkmens and Mongols were raised as hunters since their child hood. They were naturally knights and archers and mastered ambushes although they were very brave. They weren't brave fools like Viking berserkers and used their battle rage only when they ran out of tricks

mostafatarik
Автор

These war tactics of the steppe geography have become the nightmare of the enemies. This culture of commanding larger armies is based on speed, ambush and damage infliction tactics on the battlefield. Geography is destiny.

keremcite
Автор

O dönem eski Türk uygarlığının zirvesi Uygur Kağanlığındaydı. Müzik, edebiyat, resim ve aristokrat yaşamın Türkçe kolundaki en yüksek örneklerini verdiler. Batıdaki Oğuz ve Peçenek grupları ise daha kabileci anlayışla yaşayan, görece daha cahil kalmış gruplardı. Zaten bu yüzden Peçenekler yok oldu, Oğuzlar da Rum ve Fars nüfusu içinde eridiler. Bir halkın aristokrat sınıfı yaratabilmesi o halkın kültürünün ve ulusal çıkarlarının çağlar boyu var olabilmesi için önemlidir. Yoksa tarih dalgalarının arasında yok olup gider. Bugünkü Türkiye'de de aristokrat sınıfı olmadığı için ülke yol geçen hanı oldu. Herkes kafasına göre takılıyor. Ulusal bir politika yok. Araplaşma ve bilinçsiz batılılaşma aynı anda fırtına gibi yeni nesilleri biçiyor.

SagucuTegin
Автор

Nordic people and Turkic people were not strangers to each other. They knew each other very well. Well enough to stay away…

kutukteyiz
Автор

Turks and Mongols were always better warriors. always.

sahipkirantimurr
Автор

Eski bir türk savaş taktiği, turan taktiği ve ya kurt kapanı.

kjhullj
Автор

wolf trap we call it and used by ottomans too actually.... ı serve my army 3 years ago at syrian borden and we still got nearly same tactics....

letheravennest
Автор

ALGA TURAN ALGA ALTAY Azerbaycandan sevgiler

vatanmemleket
Автор

lan biz türküs at üstunde pingpong bile oynarız

boud
Автор

Being a Türk is hard because you fight with the world. Not being a Türk is harder because you fight with the Türks.

loktar
Автор

to be fair though, europeans quickly ended up learning how to deal with the horsement of the steppes and during their second invasion into Hungary they were crushed so severely that they never even considdered trying it again, bela IVth had been criticised heavily for his inabillity to effectively counter them during the first invasion so he set to work fixing that but would not experience the second one himself

he mostly just had castles built, reinforced and ordnances enforced for what to do in case of an enemy army, farmers would harvest all they could and would bring it all to the castle where the entire local population would take shelter. nomadic hordes were such fast and effective campaigners because they didn't need a large supply train, they would mostly live of the land, they couldn't that time around and ended up trying to besiege some castles, maybe taking one or two but at an unacceptable cost.

meanwhile the king of hungary mustered his proffesionalised army and marched to crush the two mongol armies destroying one entirely and the other broke apart and fled. soon after the mongols would lose more and more influence in that region whilst also losing their edge in the middle east as the mamluks chose to fight fire with fire and use the horseback archers and lancers against them (the latter was also done by europeans, and effectively so in the end but horseback archery never really cought on in most of europe, instead heavily armored crossbowmen, bowmen and infantry tended to take the main stage allongside knights which were the most heavily armored warriors of their age, (so basically they just outranged the mongols with foot archers and crossbowmen and if they got to close they would face heavily armored infantry and be charged by the tanks of their age (the mongols were no doubt more skilled as general horsemen but they rode light hardy ponies, european knights were so heavy they rode massive warhorses that by themselves were worth more than most people would have earned in their lifetime perhaps even several, they were not even ridden on the journey, knights would ride a common sadle horse and would mount their warhorses only for battle or perhaps also for tourneys

istoppedcaring
visit shbcf.ru