Cliffe explains the Gospels not included in the bible. #christian #cliffeknechtle

preview_player
Показать описание
Cliffe Knechtle answers the question of the Gospels not included in the bible and why there not included.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

There is only one Gospel. God has given us all we need. Blessed be the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Ask Him to be your Lord over your life. He is all you need.

t.bayviking
Автор

It’s always the people that don’t want to follow the four gospels that want 92 or the ones that won’t follow the main two commandments that want 600

ShermanMays-fwko
Автор

Gospels of Thomas and Philip:
According to the early church, these "gospels" were written by a persian cultist, were not written by the disciplse, and should be rejected as heresy

InitialPC
Автор

Thank you for the explanation sir. Be bless.

sylvieturcot
Автор

Ok so, the books that were chosen to form the Bible, where chosen in an ecumenical council. Ecumenical councils were held only by direct order of the Byzantine empiror. In ecumenical councils the church fathers sat down for extended periods of time and along with prayers, they decided which books are ok and which are not. What is the problem with this fact and why cliff didn't mention it? It is because the Byzantines were orthodox catholics. That confirms the orthodox are the original christians and they have this major authority that no other church or denomination (heresy) has.

apostolosnikolis
Автор

They are more aptly trermed "Pseudo gospels".

bobclifton
Автор

where can I watch the full conversation here?

saltymanga
Автор

Let's all add the fact that said gospels were written around the third century.

_nosneb
Автор

The Other Gospels are late fabrication that teaches Gnosticism.

DefenderOfChrist_
Автор

That's not the right answer, that's a circular answer.
Those apocryphal gospels are not real not because they contradict the real gospel, but because they are fake. They were written hundreds of years later, not apostles.

The answer "because they contradict the real gospel" begs the question "why is the real gospel real", and the answer is not related to their content, but their source: the real gospel writers who wrote and lived at the time of Jesus.

adrianrg
Автор

Yeh they didn’t line up with the gospel so they aren’t gospels at all. Oral tradition predates scripture. Plus, most of them were written super late

MatthewRWSmith
Автор

I don’t have a view on additional gospels but Jesus did teach the spiritual was superior to the physical; John 6:63.

AdamEyers
Автор

The gospel of Judas can be included in that too

jorgeoyola
Автор

I disagree. A group of men appointed by the state and Catholics does not dictate what I should or shouldn't read. If you want to follow the mainstream library of books for Christians and Jesus followers you would know that, "whatever goes into the body does not defile you" so it doesn't matter if you take care of your body or the earth. Yes it's good, but that's not the point. This natural body we have and earth we live on is temporary and full of sin. The gnostics accepted Christ and believed that he rose from death. The Catholic crusades came and murdered the Gnostics and they fully accepted their fate by jumping into the flames willingly, because they fully knew that this physical life is not what they live for, but the spiritual life they have later. Please read about these martyrs for Christ.

slowtospeak
Автор

Weird thing. I've seen alot of Cliffs videos, cand yet to hear him declare the gospel, as Jesus did.
Cliff, is constantly preaching the TEACHING, of salvation, which is not the gospel.
Acts 28:31
Mk. 1:14-15

eltonron
Автор

Gospel of Judas meaning is fake, is not real

jorgeoyola
Автор

Why did the Catholic Church reject the Gnostic Gospels?

Because Gnostic Christianity was a threat to the Church's political power.

phantom.wreath