What does the relativity of morals require? | #morality

. If morality is relative, then perhaps what the atheist believes is wrong and suspicious is exactly right.

But is morality really relative?

The idea of moral relativism is literally destroying the world; because if morality were relative, what would it be?

You can put Hitler on trial.

And you can't prosecute any crime.

What you think is a crime may be the essence of truth and goodness.

The idea of moral relativism is an idea that destroys the meaning of courts, judicial authorities, and constitutions.

The idea of moral relativism destroys the meaning of the state.

So how do I prosecute you for a crime that you may have been right to commit?

If the world followed this atheistic view, by God, we would be transformed within hours into a jungle of...
A crazy and savage people.

The world would collapse within hours if atheism were true.

By God, there is an innate human consensus on the necessity of punishing the criminal, and this consensus contradicts the essence of atheism, and the source of this consensus is that morality is absolute.
The man is expensive.
. If morality were relative, people would not have agreed on the necessity of punishing the criminal, and there would be no meaning to punishing him.
. If this person had not been charged, we would not have been able to try him.
. It is the basis of law, constitution, courts, judiciary, punishment, retribution, and the basis of the state as a whole
These morals are absolute, and that man is responsible.
. And merely questioning these axioms leads to the collapse of the state. The man falls.
If you want to control a state in two hours, it is easy: bring a group of...
atheists, and atheism rules among them!
. And believe me, not one hour will pass after atheism takes control until they go out like madmen
In the streets, and in the second hour everything will collapse.
. Atheism will not survive except with the remnants of prophecies.
. Atheism will not survive except with the remnants of religious values.
. Atheism will not survive except with the rule of absolute morality.
. Atheism will not survive except with the remnants of sound nature.
. Atheism is an idea that is not suitable for application or even imagination. . The problem is that the atheist, as I said, is forced to claim the relativity of morals in order to agree with his atheism

No more.

Atheism contradicts the axioms

Atheism contradicts the innate human consensus.

But why do we assert that morals are absolute in every age and in every place?

The answer: Because morals are objective and not subjective.

Objective morals

It is subjective

And the objective thing is the thing in its reality, so we say this is a book

And this is an objective matter

But when you say: I like this book, this is a subjective matter.
#morality
#atheism
#relgion