Does Archeology Disprove the Bible? #Shorts

To see more content from Jon McCray go to @whaddoyoumeme
To see more content from Melissa Dougherty go to @MelissaDougherty
To see more content from Alisa Childers go to @alisachilders
To see more content from Tim Stratton go to @FreethinkingMinistries
To see more content from Bobby Conway go to @ChristianityStillMakesSense

📚 𝗥𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲𝘀

🤝 𝗦𝗨𝗣𝗣𝗢𝗥𝗧 𝗖𝗥𝗢𝗦𝗦𝗘𝗫𝗔𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗘𝗗 (𝗧𝗔𝗫-𝗗𝗘𝗗𝗨𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗕𝗟𝗘) 🤝

👥 𝗦𝗢𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗠𝗘𝗗𝗜𝗔 👥

🗄️ 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗢𝗨𝗥𝗖𝗘𝗦 🗄️

🎙️ 𝗦𝗨𝗕𝗦𝗖𝗥𝗜𝗕𝗘 𝗧𝗢 𝗢𝗨𝗥 𝗣𝗢𝗗𝗖𝗔𝗦𝗧 🎙️

#Apologetics #Jesus #Christianity #Theology #Doctrine #Bible #QuestionsAboutFaith #Answers #Skeptics  #ChristianityIsTrue #True #CrossExamined #FrankTurek

[annetteounga]

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." ❤

[Jacke]

No physical proof can convince an atheist. It must come from the spirit.

[JoseIbarra-okub]

Amen... Hallelujah... GOD bless you greatly... 💕

[festushaggen]

Actually many have come to faith by setting out to use archeology as a means to debunk the Bible. The evidence found in the process points far more to the Bible being true than false. God welcomes a challenge. He knows He'll still be standing at the end.

[KodeLiMe]

The bottom line is that people will believe anything that gives them license to sin without accountability.

[somerandom]

"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."
I completely agree, but it is an excellent reason to not believe something. Especially if that something should have left behind evidence.

[Jack-yfss]

92% of Bible locations have been validated

[markhorton]

Non-religious Israeli archeologists use the Bible as a guide to new dig sites

[keagancasey]

What about archaeology sites in other parts of the world? How do they fit into the bible timeline? Like Mayan and Aztec or even china? Just curious

[kernlove]

The short answer is no and many of those same scholars just plainly state their bias against the evidence in front of their faces, which is undeniable.

[spyrosstivactas]

Socrates never wrote a book. Yet Plato and Aristotle wrote about him. But if we found seals of scribes, that some other book said these scribes were around writing about Socrates, we’d believe Socrates existed.
This how secular archaeologically works! Yet when it comes to Moses or Jesus, archeology is reluctant to be as bold.

[RangerRyke]

What?! The evidence is that Jericho wasn’t even inhabited during its supposed conquest and that most of the cities cited as be conquered by Israel in the Bible either didn’t exist or were conquered in different time periods. There is a lot more than absence of evidence.

[avejupiter]

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence exept when your claiming something that isnt substantiated

[isheworthy]

There's now an entire field of archeology devoted to the Bible, because of how reliable it has been found to be regarding archaeological evidence.

[joseobregon]

I had a girl that I was witnessing to....say that Mary Magdalen & Jesus were a couple....😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫😳😳😳

[logicalatheist]

Nothing has ever supported the supernatural claims in the bible.

[hansdemos]

Dr. Turek is answering the question by not addressing the issue.
The question was if there is an *_apologetic_* response to the claims that archaeological evidence debunks many people and events in the Bible, not if it is really true that archaeological evidence debunks many people and events in the Bible. Dr. Turek does not address the issue of the evidence that does debunk things in the Bible, but only demonstrates how an apologist can try to wriggle out of that issue by pointing away from it to things that we don't know yet, or other people and events from the Bible that happen to be supported by archaeological evidence.
A rhetorical evasion tactic like this may work to stun some hapless opponent temporarily, but it will almost certainly backfire in the long run.

[jackalsgate]

If the mystery of God, the -
• Unknowable
• Unnameable.
• Unfathomable.
• Infinity.
ever dies, it will be because Chrstnty killed it.

[isakrynell]

The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence argument is so bad. Yes technically it’s true but it can be used to argue for anything. No evidence for Santa not evidence of absence and the same goes for any nonsense you can imagine. If there isn’t evidence where we expect evidence then that is in my opinion evidence of absence. If someone claims a rhino rampaged through a mall in Omaha. But there was no damage to the mall no rhino was reported missing from any where in the vicinity and no other reports where forthcoming. Then we are entitled to say there was no rhino and that the report was bullocks.

[DiscipleOfJesus]

How about we go back to the beginning of Adam and so on to each generation they were taught from generation to generation to generation passed on how to teach this and all God's word and it kept going and it never stopped this is the Jewish culture it's their history it's no different than any history that we've been learning for the last hundred years so if anybody thinks it's wrong theyvneed to take out the Theology/Biblical class see how the scriptures are put together it was so perfect and Harmony that they weren't allowed to not keep it as it was written from each generation to generation and they had to teach it in a correct way so each future generation would continue in the truth so if you think that there's something lies of the Old Testament then you don't know how history was created and how man kept it so it would be correctly for people to study it❤