Does Archaeology Disprove the Bible?

[christtheonlyhope]

Archaeology is one of the best sciences to prove the Bible! Thanks brother Ken

[Southern]

I always like to believe that science is just a simple glimpse into what God has done for us in the creation of the universe. Not to say we can act as gods ourselves.

[samuelrodriguez]

Love ya brother. Appreciate the hard work and dedication and devotion to God's word.

[RobertHackney-zf]

If it is God's word, why is a man's name attached to most of the books? And God's name is not attached to any.

[zerosteel]

100% agree! God's word is true history of the world.

[Quirll]

Which god? There are millions of gods, thousands of religions and denominations and thousands of holy books. I could say that mine are a the only one true god because she comes and cooks dinner for me every night and then tucks me in at night.

[Just_A._Tablespoon]

I find it annoying how atheists are trashing on this video as if this video even fully explains his point. That's why the video says, "Before we look at those exciting finds..." and then never explains the "exciting finds." The short is just that, a short. It's not stating all the evidence for creationism because that wouldn't fit in a short. It's discussing AiG's stance on how they interpret archeology and a summarization of their worldview.

Stop pretending like Ken Ham's stating something he's not.

[jerktopus]

I am surprised at so many of the comments here. Ken Ham, this is why your work is so important and how great it is for you to use your platform to break into this media space. I think especially these ‘YouTube shorts’ are inportant for your ministry as it seems many of the viewers interacting with these uploads are those that wouldn’t invest in the longer format style (at least not right away…). Please don’t be discouraged by the negativity and ignorance. These are the people who will greatly benefit from your passion to reach the lost and reintroduce critical thinking and an honest approach to the scientific method that can see beyond the indoctrination of modern academia.

Many prayers and much appreciation for your ministry and your faithfulness Ken Ham.

[SC-cdhb]

Keep going, Ken! I agree, since the Bible has been proven to be historically accurate, it is what I rely on.

[BONER]

You can’t just say “gods word is better so I won’t believe evidence” that’s not how anyone gets anywhere. If you truly cared more about your understanding of the world, and the Bible’s truth, then you’d have to understand that there are fallacies and contradictions within the Bible as well. Not to mention, severely flawed and outdated information. The Bible has been changed so many times for so many different purposes, that In one version, it would say something completely different than the old testament. Take Timothy 2:12 which states “I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man; she must be quiet.” Are these beliefs practiced today? Are these beliefs outdated and incorrect? Yes, in every way. So if we are to view this in such a light, taking it as outdated, then we should take the rest of the Bible as this as well. To state this to be outdated, and to say the rest is just fine, and gods word, is unfair to science and the Bible. Not to mention the fact that you don’t even state a single piece of evidence that was given, you simply said “before we get into that” and cut it short before we could hear ANYTHING besides you insulting archeology. You have done nothing but ask for evidence to our beliefs, while giving none to your own. And plus, the events of the Bible happening in real life doesn’t mean that god is real. There are many ways they could have been simply over exaggerated. For example. Mary, the mother of Jesus, could have been a victim of rape, and was forced to keep quiet by the man who did it. Forcing her to come up with the idea of god gifting her with the child, as his own. I don’t mean to insult your beliefs, and I certainly am not saying you have to change them. I’m simply stating the fact that if you want to ask for our evidence, but provide none of your own, or simply say “gods word is law” and take no evidence to his nonexistence, then you can’t consider anything your saying as science, or rational thought. This is pseudoscience at best, and lies at worst

[OGNabs]

What if God was to say to you right now: I don’t require faith, I want you to prove my existence to everyone.? That would completely revolutionise everyones thinking.

[fionakies]

GOD'S WORD IS TRUTH AND LIGHT AND LIFE AND HE HAS THE FINAL SAY. TRUST GOD OVER MEN. ❤❤❤❤

[Yakobis]

So you have you conclusion and you use the evidence to work back from there

[joshheath]

What the heck? Isn't the study of reality and history not the best way to honor God?

[markusklyver]

Schrödinger's creationist: "there is rock-solid undeniable evidence for a young Earth and you can know for sure our God exists and that my interpretation is correct, but you still have to rely on faith"

[joerigoedhart]

The bible was written by 40 men, over centuries. Most of them unknown an completely unverified. It really truly holds not a shred of credibility. That is also why it completely falls apart by archaeology, geology, astromony, biology and effectively any verifiable objective science you test it against. Mythology like many before it.

[bepis]

This guy got absolutely obliterated by Bill Nye lol

[The__Witnesses]

From the Crown of Thorns to the Roman Spear that pierced Christ’s side, to the Empty Tomb to the Shroud of Turin…archaeology objectively proves that Jesus is God.

[thomasehrlich]

This is pseudoscience. Religion isn’t science. Science has evidence, religion has faith. Gods word what a laugh.

[onlywayministries]

I’m heavily considering converting to Orthodoxy. Any recommended Orthodox apologists?