Ep. #197: Can criminal history contribute to reasonable suspicion?

preview_player
Показать описание
Join us for another interesting edition of Roadside Chat where Anthony Bandiero teaches law enforcement officers best practices and clarifies legal issues officers face every day. 💪

✅ Drop a like and subscribe, thank you for your support! 🥰

Blue to Gold Training:

Connect with us, learn us more. We keep our updates and news posted on social media:

#LawEnforcementTraining #PoliceTraining #LegalEducation #reasonablesuspicion #rs #crime
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Great question and thank you for the explanation!

JezzaTheChamp
Автор

love these vids. They help me out in the field!

stevenherbel
Автор

Relevant and recent are good standards but remember it is only part of the totality of the circumstances.
Breaking down the recivity rates of types of offenses is important, thank you for explaining why previous sexual assault are exempt in court but not from establishing Ras.
I choked at ( to be edited for time stamp 6:01) when you misspoke about arrest v conviction and saying arrest is way better, . Lol for me it happens.
The problem is most officers will not know if a conviction or dismissal occurred in misdemeanors again why I caution officers away from this.
Civil rights "auditors" get unlawful arrest frequently, be especially cautious when using previous history of known activist. You guys have fusion centers that always update arrests but rarely update that the arrest were found to be unlawful.

blueliesmatter