Understanding the contains() Method: Are Two Approaches in JavaScript Equivalent?

Explore the performance differences between two JavaScript approaches using the `contains()` method to check elements and their children.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: In terms of time complexity/performance, are the following two equivalent in javascript?

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the contains() Method: Are Two Approaches in JavaScript Equivalent?

When writing JavaScript, performance is often a key consideration, especially when dealing with DOM elements. A common question that arises is whether two different approaches to checking element containment yield the same performance results. This post examines this issue, especially focusing on the contains() method.

The Question

You might find yourself checking if a specific child element exists within a parent element in the DOM. Let's consider the following two approaches:

Check parent and its children:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Check parent’s children only:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

At first glance, one may assume that these methods would entail a similar amount of processing, as they both seem to check for matches within the confines of the parent and its children. However, that assumption may not be entirely accurate.

In-Depth Explanation of the Solution

How contains() Actually Works

Initially, there could be some misconceptions about how the contains() method operates. Many developers, including myself, might think that contains() begins from the parent element and recursively checks its children down the DOM tree for a match. However, this is not the case.

Actual Behavior: The contains() method starts from the specified child element and works its way up through the DOM tree back to the parent. This means it checks if the specified element is an ancestor of the target element.

Evaluating the Two Approaches

With the actual behavior of contains() clarified, we can now evaluate the two approaches:

Using contains():

Single Check: This method only requires one traversal of the DOM—from the child back to the parent.

Performance: Since it requires fewer operations (only one trip), this approach is generally faster, regardless of how many children the parent has.

Multiple Checks: This approach involves converting the parent’s children into an array and then checking each child element individually using contains().

Performance Cost: Since you need to check each child separately, this results in n trips up the DOM, where n is the number of children of the parent. Thus, the overhead increases as the number of children grows.

Conclusion

When writing performance-sensitive JavaScript, it’s crucial to understand how specific methods like contains() work and to select the approach that will yield optimal performance.

By recognizing these differences, you can make informed decisions that enhance the efficiency of your web applications.