Does God exist? Can science prove that God exist?

preview_player
Показать описание
Does god exist? What science say about god? Where do we come from? There must be something or someone who created everything.

Subscribe the channel and turn on the notification bell for more
Like, comment and share

CHECKOUT MY OTHER VIDEOS:

SCIENCE THEORIES ON GHOSTS

5 SCIENTIFIC WAYS THAT CAN CAUSE A ZOMBIE APOCALYPSE

IS IT POSSIBLE TO LIVE ON A LITTLE PLANET?

SCIENCE BEHIND HINDU TRADITIONS AND RITUALS

#god #godexist #science
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

"The Earth. It's size is perfect."
Oh definitely not. It needs to be _much_ bigger in order to have the gravity needed for vlorgs to survive.

"The Earth's size corresponding gravity, holds a thin layer of mostly nitrogen and oxygen gases..."
The size (volume) doesn't matter. Gravity is based on weight (mass).
As for the gases, for the overwhelming majority of Earth's history there was almost no oxygen in the atmosphere. So there being oxygen in it is a (relatively) recent phenomenon.

"If Earth were smaller, an atmosphere would be impossible..."
So if it were 5% smaller? Or 5% bigger? Or is it just that there's a range? You mention Mercury, 1/10 the size of Earth, and Jupiter, 1000 times the size of the Earth. That's a pretty big range, isn't it, to be considering what we _have_ to be the 'perfect size'?
Besides, the major reason for the presence of oxygen in the atmosphere is the _temperature_ of the planet, not the gravity. Venus, Mars, and Earth can all hold oxygen based on that.

"Earth is the only known planet, equipped with an atmosphere of the right mixture of gases, to sustain plant, animal, and human life."
Sure, but it is the wrong mixture to support vlorgs.
Of course, we actually know quite a few planets that might be habitable. It's hard to tell because they're far away. If you only include ones close enough to be _sure_ about it, we know of a grand total of eight planets. Not really a good sample size.

"Water... no living thing can live without it..."
Maybe, maybe not. Perhaps life can survive on super-critical CO2. In order to find out, we'd have to know a lot more than we do.

"The universe had a start. What caused it?"
I don't know. Neither does anyone else. In some ways a 'cause' doesn't seem plausible as all causation that we discuss is temporal, but the start of the universe seems to also be the start of time. Or, in other words, there has never been a time there wasn't a universe. Can it be said, then, to have a start?

"Scientists are convinced that our universe began with one enormous explosion of energy and light which we now call the Big Bang."
Close, but not quite. The Big Bang is not thought to be an explosion. It's thought to be a rapid expansion, like stretching a rubber sheet quickly.

"[The Big Bang] was the singular start to everything that exists."
Including god? Well, good to know.
Of course, this assumes the universe is all that exists. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't.

"Scientists have no explanation for the [Big Bang]..."
They have some ideas (Lawrence Krauss, for instance).

"The universe operates by uniform laws of nature. Why does it?"
Because things are what they are, aren't what they aren't, and nothing is neither or both. To suggest that they _shouldn't_ operate that way is to suggest that simple things can behave in different ways in the same circumstances.
Those 'laws' are human descriptions of how the universe operates, so whatever those operations were we would just be describing them.

"Much of life may seem uncertain..."
Yes. Life. Complex chemistry.

"...the Earth rotates in the same 24 hours..."
Today it does. In a couple hundred million years it'll take 26 hours, a couple hundred million years ago it was 22 hours.

"There is no logical necessity for a universe that obeys rules...."
It doesn't. The rules aren't 'obeyed', they're descriptions of what it does.

"It is easy to imagine a universe in which conditions change unpredictably from instant to instant or even a universe in which things pop in and out of existence."
I can also imagine magic pixies easily. Leprechauns, wizards, dragons... easy to imagine. So what? Plus, if you think this is an argument, why couldn't the Big Bang singularity have just popped into existence, but such popping into or out of existence is a rare event, so we don't notice it happening?

"All this thing [sic] makes us think, how everything can be perfect in the universe?"
Define 'perfect'.

"If god doesn't exist, how everything in the universe came into existence?"
Universe-farting pixies, a universe-creating magic rock, or the forces of gravity operating as they do.
This is called an 'argument from ignorance fallacy'. It's an error in thinking.

"Do you believe god exists?"
No. There's no evidence for it, and the god claim is inherently untestable in most cases (making evidence even in principle impossible), though in the cases where god claims _are_ testable, every one of them has been found to be false.

robindude