Did you notice this in Harry Potter?

preview_player
Показать описание
Did you notice this in Harry Potter? After Sirius's death, Harry inherited all of his belongings, including Kreacher. However, in the Deathly Hallows, Harry gave Kreacher the fake Slytherin Locket that his former master Regulus had. Doesn't this mean that Kreacher was then freed, as he was offered the locket to wear by his master, Harry? Or perhaps jewelry does not count as clothing?

Join this channel to get access to perks:

Watch More:

- The Life of Harry Potter Characters:

- Harry Potter Explained:

- What Would Characters See In The Mirror Of Erised:

- Harry Potter Ranking Videos:

- Harry Potter Theories:

- What Happened to These Characters:

- Harry Potter Small Details:

- Artwork Credit:

- All Pictures/Clips belong to ©Warner Bros.

*****

Harry Potter Explained.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Jewelry is not clothing, it's considered an accessory.

marinabenoit
Автор

No because jewelry can't be considered as clothes. At chamber of secrets Dobby found a sock in Tom riddle's diary and he was freed thanks to Harry

prider
Автор

Jewelry is an accessory to clothing, so Kreacher was still technically a slave.

ColtonRMagby
Автор

Hmm. I gotta try wearing a locket instead of a shirt the next time I go to school.

DailyGrinderII-gdtb
Автор

Harry didn’t want to own creature, he freed Dobby after all

lesliepropheter
Автор

No he never give it to him he asked him to fined the guy who took the real locket.

gazturnbull
Автор

Of course it is not But Harry did asked Kreacher to find the real locket.

PapaEnoch
Автор

Well I'll go out in only a locket and we'll see how that works out

katl
Автор

Jewellery isn't Clothing. Also the Elves specifically demand Socks. In the 5th year, Hermione tried freeing the House-Elves with Woolen Hats and Scarf but her attempts failed as the angry Elves simply refused to clean the Gryffindor Tower.

ruturajshiralkar
Автор

No as jewellery doesn’t count as it is not classed as clothing.

stephennewton
Автор

The question is do you think Harry would keep Kreacher in servitude? He was freed of screen by the gift of used underwear off screen for obvious reasons.

psykid
Автор

You're right. Jewellery isn't clothing😊

VihaanJoshi-nz
Автор

Stop that scheming! Long Live H.P.!!!

shellybastion
Автор

So wait not only has Harry got the vast amounts of wealth his parents left him but he’s also inherited Sirius’s stuff and likely a lot of Dumbledores? This dude is seriously rich 😂

Caleberigby
Автор

It isnt clothing and also even if it did count regulus would have wanted kreacher to have it

Hephaestusfav
Автор

Idk bc after that he started working in the kitchens with winky “and” Dobby( dobby was dead the 😢) so maybe he was free but I don’t really count as clothing. I counted as an accessory but I don’t make the rules JK rolling does.

Fairy-rhds
Автор

That was not a good attempt at a video

scriptednetwork