120mm DM33 APFSDS (Leopard 2A4) vs T-72B with Kontakt-5 ERA - Simulation

preview_player
Показать описание
This simulation demonstrates well how and why reactive armor excels at protecting vehicles against kinetic energy penetrators.

Without ERA, the DM33 projectile was almost able to penetrate the whole armor, whereas with Kontakt-5, the black plate was barely reached.

120mm DM33 APFSDS (Leopard 2A4) vs 60-10-10-20-20-50mm armor (T-72B Upper Front Glacis):

Sources:
- Tankograd T-72

#simulation #explicitdynamics #ansys #defence #APFSDS #ArmorPiercing
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This shows us how ERA itself cannot stop a kinetic round but can decrease its effectiveness. The ERA did a wonderful Job destabilising the round and fracturing it at various points in its length. This causes a minor increase of the cavity and the round being somewhat of the target meaning it cannot perforate the plate. The effectiveness of the Penerator is reduced to due to the fracturing and fragmentation.

rafaykhanyousefzai
Автор

ERA showed in this video is KONTAKT-1 not Kontakt-5

svetpolitikeratovaioruzja
Автор

Kontakt 1 wasn`t designed to combat FIn rounds, hence the fly plates are not dense enough, it was designed against HEAT

simonh
Автор

ERA reduces the penetrating power of Sabot shells by about 20% ish.

CMDRFandragon
Автор

the first one seemed like it would penetrate if you leaved the simulation one more second

kolaach
Автор

Very interesting. Can you do one against T72 turret armor + ERA?

usov
Автор

Was tested live fire and went through like butter.

wekker
Автор

Can you try simulate M829A4? It’s supposed to negate the effects of ERA.

danny
Автор

And this is just the DM33. Now imagine a DM43 or DM53

benjaminnagy
Автор

I think I see more damage at the last plate with ERA, in video of simulation, maybe even penetration, but on photo in the end...

olololoolol
Автор

Why did you stop the animation of the simulation without letting the arrow finish its trajectory? it is not clear if using the ERA armor the ammunition will not penetrate the frontal armor, it would be good if you could upload it again, but this time complete ;)

flakhas
Автор

Does this work if the explosive filler has been replaced with rubber?(asking for a friend)

stevenbreach
Автор

All these videos are cut off before the end, is it some sort of bait?

cxbx
Автор

would like to see what like 3bm42 would do to the T-84 with the duplet ERA

edgy_dabs
Автор

It would be nice to look at the T-72B with a booking package of the 1989 model of the year

xddxdd
Автор

And then there is reallife tests that have shown that era(otherwise we would have different projectiles) does not prevent penetration from a4s penetrators odd isn't it?

davidh.
Автор

Video is incorrect. Whole point of K5 hull package is that activation violently yeets thick outer armor plate up, clamping on the rod and violently displacing it. Acceptable case scenario is hitting the bottom part of a section, which merely results in shatter, which costs about a third of effective pen. The best case scenario is grazing the top of the section, which displaces the rod onto second section or into the turret/air, resulting in massive material loss and negligible damage to armor.
Worst case, however, is rod being redirected into driver port by hitting the top part of driver port adjacent top ERA section. To minimize the chances of this occasion happening, top section of K5 package is trimmed and designed to swing upon activation, clamping on rod unevenly, attempting to redirrect it DOWN and hopefully shatter it by bending. This provides randomized results. If rod is built to specs and fail to shatter, performance drops to 9-13%, if it shatters, about a quarter of pen is lost. The rest, however, might still get "tested" against the "weak spot" which will result in "significant emotional event" for the driver if we talk about longer, heavier rods.

burningsinner
Автор

0:10 I'm sorry but that is Kontakt 1 ERA
Because simply it's too small and messy for a Kontakt 5

Cirno_Say_No_To_Zionist
Автор

Try it with dm 53, 750mm lenght and 25mm thicknes

Nicolas
Автор

Do one with Dm 53 or Dm 63. Kontakt 5 is very new, it should meet a new round out of the longer L55 barell

langweilerkanal