Tim Palmer: Does Bohmian Theory Have to Be Nonlocal? New Directions for Analysing the Bell Theorem

preview_player
Показать описание
Tim Palmer (University of Oxford, UK) about "Does Bohmian Theory Have to Be Nonlocal? New Directions for Analysing the Bell Theorem" at the Emergent Quantum Mechanics 2017 (EmQM17) Symposium sponsored by the Fetzer Franklin Fund at the University of London (UK).

EmQM17 was the 4th International Symposium about Quantum Mechanics based on a "Deeper Level Theory".

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

OTHER PLAYLISTS/EVENTS/PRESENTATIONS:

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

© Fetzer Franklin Fund

FETZER FRANKLIN FUND:

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

It seems plausible, that it is a particle-universe consisting of C(10^120) particles 4:37. Nonexistent paths may be due to uncertainty in the initial conditions(ensemble interpretation). I don't see the opposite helicity, which is kind of strange. Two things i am certain of: all fields are effective(fractal field) and nature obeys local realism.

frun
Автор

How ironic. The modernist-times' forgotten classical physics field (nowadays they don't even work on it, almost completely left it to engineers) exposes the fundamental crakcs of post-modern times' most trusted (and allegedly the best ever) physics theory.

garnettraypaul