Experts DESTROY Darwin's Theory in 16 Minutes

In this video David Gelernter, David Berlinksi, and Stephen Meyer break down the mathematical problems with Darwin's Theory of Evolution.

[dansworld]

People don't know the difference between small changes and big changes. We see adaptations in the "same kind" of animals, but we never see one kind changing into another kind.

[joshuajohnson]

Almost everything we grew up learning that was true was a lie from the start with malicious intention

[salmonkill]

I'm a retired Career National Laboratory Staff Scientist that successfully earned 15 US PATENTS and I won 2 R&D 100 AWARDS for the top 100 International Inventions twice. Scientists ARE EXPECTED to constantly question Science THEORIES and ASSUMPTIONS and these are CONSTANTLY overturned when better GUESSES and ASSUMPTIONS are proposed and shown to be MORE CORRECT than the previous HYPOTHESISES!

HEALTHY SCIENCE questions EVERYTHING CONSTANTLY!!

The reason DARWINIAN EVOLUTION (that a one-celled organism mutated and resulted in all life on Earth today) is still pushed in TEXTBOOKS today, SIMPLY to JUSTIFY a MATERIALISTIC WORLDVIEW.

[brushylake]

Write a computer program. Insert random keystrokes into the code. Let me know how often the program works better.

[mysticnomad]

Everything should be questioned.
To quote a famous quote.
I would rather have questions that can't be answered then answers that can't be questioned.

[rduse]

As a reviewer, you strike a good balance of showing the main video, and then interjecting short statements that add value to me being a viewer. - Well done!

[richardhcarter]

I have never seen a debate with David Gelernter before, but the way he took it upon himself and interrupted the discussion to defend Stephen Meyer was impressive. Much respect for someone who will take their time to do that.

[hotrodsgarage]

I’m just here to see what all the “experts” have to say in the comments.

[halamish]

I have two arguments that challenge the theory of evolution:
1. No-one manufactures typewriters and dialing phones today, since they have been superseded by computer printers and smartphones. Why should monkeys that it is alleged preceded humans continue to exist?
2. Predators such as leopards are slightly faster than their prey (e.g. antelopes). They are not a hundred times faster. Why should humans who lived in caves or trees develop brains capable of thinking of relativity and quantum mechanics?
"Progressive" people have adopted the theory of evolution since it apparently removes the need for a Creator, and the absolute distinction between right and wrong.

[TimothyOBrien]

Are you allowed to question Darwin??? Of course. That's a function of science.

[TheTriplelman]

chaos does not make organization to any level!

[RaymondHebert-ou]

They talk about arranging the parts properly, which is impossible by chance. Further, you have to have the raw materials to start with and have to ask the question of how they got there. Further again, you have to account for the origin of properties and laws of the universe, matter, etc.

[rundix]

Not everything you are told in school is necessarily true. Find out for yourself.

[arturhawk]

Excellent argument! Early mutation destroys the creature, late mutation is basically meaningless.

[garygable]

Everything around us that does a job, was created. In philosophy, one argument is that you put in all the parts necessary for a pocket watch and shake it forever but without somebody arranging it in an order, it will never become a watch.

[Billyitsangel]

What came first the chicken or the egg. Both require the other, so what is more likely? Organisms transforming into other beings over millions of years. Or a godlike being willing them into existence fully formed? I am more inclined to believe in a godlike being willing them into existence.

[chadbrown]

No scientific hypothesis or theory claims 'random' or 'chance' is a causal mechanism; random/chance in science is a measure of the likelihood of something happening and that 'something' is the actual mechanism not 'change' or 'random'. For example, when someone says there is a 10% chance of rain that 'chance' isn't 'rain' itself, the mechanism is precipitation. Chance/random is just the measurement of that causal mechanism of precipitation occurring. Similarly, chance/random in DNA variation isn't the CAUSAL mechanism, instead it's a measurement of variation due to transcription errors occurring ( as well as other mechanisms of variation. )

[clurkroberts]

Darwin’s theory of evolution was an important jumping stone for science to explore the creation of life. But tge original theory does not hold up, hence the creation of neo Darwinism. But it’s all subjective research rather than hard science.

[RiggyRonnie]

We’ve all witnessed mutations during our lifetimes. Both in humans and in animals. Him saying there hasn’t been enough time is pure ignorance. He’s not as smart as he props himself up to be

[MrKhan-tdux]

Everyone ignores the elephant on the room: DNA is not only a template for hardware. It is also SOFTWARE.