Trump Shooting Conspiracies, Multiple Shooters DEBUNKED

In this in-depth Donald Trump shooting analysis, Jeff Ostroff walks you through a thorough and detailed analysis and debunking of conspiracy theories in the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump in Butler, PA on Jan 2024 at 6:11 PM by Thomas Matthew Crooks.

Several videos shot by bystanders capturing vital phases of the shooter will all be analyzed and compared to numerous conspiracy theories on the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.

See these other videos mentioned in this video:
Azget Industries: Illustration of Attempted Assassination of President Trump Part 2

Three Audio Files Align and Agree: There Were Two Shooters - Peak Prosperity:

00:00 Introduction to Trump shooting conspiracy theories
00:19 Correction to bleacher location of shooting victim
03:15 Conspiracy Theory: 2nd shooter in 2nd floor window
05:15 Alternate shooter positions
05:34 Can police snipers on the 2nd floor see the shooter on the roof?
06:42 Conspiracy Theory: Multiple Shooters
13:18 Analyzing 2nd-floor sniper in Trump shooting
14:25 Conspiracy Theory: Sniper on Water Tower
17:11 Could a sniper on the water tower shoot Trump at the rally?

[liberty-matrix]

Everyone admits that not covering the rooftop was a colossal failure. But how did a 20 yr. old kid know to exploit that failure? It only works if it was planned.

[Practika_]

Re audio, did you know the other guy showed 3 seperate audios from three separate mics ALL mimicking each other exactly. That simple fact alone destroys your theory about the moving phone angle. Do you have any particular expertise in these matters? The other guy does. The other guy showed a video comparing the speed at which the world champ fast shooter could fire off 5 rounds. The champion's fastest time was about the same speed as the second lot of 5 shots at the Trump rally. The suggestion here is that there is no way this 20 year old kid could possibly fire of 5 rounds as fast as the world champ. Those 5 shots were by a professional trained shooter. No? There is a video on the shooter right at the moment the first shot was heard. He was located nowhere near the roof apex. This was confirmed by a pic of two counter snipers standing over the shooter on the roof after he was shot. So he didn't 'pop' his head above the roof apex to take a shot. That was a stupid statement also because the shooter would be body down in a prone position to sight his rifle properly, certainly not sitting upright. A key question is; given the counter snipers behind Trump were located on a roof way higher than Trump's head, how come these highly trained snipers could not see the shooter either get on the roof nor crawl into a firing position whereas the shooter could obviously see Trump, who was positioned at a lower angle than the snipers.

[kjfrauenfelder]

Dude..just STOP. We have VIDEO of Congressmen visiting THAT 2-story building, looking out some of those windows, AFFIRMING an EASY VIEW of the 1-story ROOF. PEOPLE were SHOUTING 2 minutes prior just BELOW those OPEN WINDOWs, "there's a man on the ROOF‼️He has a GUN‼️
NO WAY THAT 2-floor TEAM can be UNAWARE of said PRESENCE. No way THEY LEAVE that roof obscured from their ENTIRE VIEW.
1. We need an AUTOPSY on Crooks YESTERDAY! WHERE did the LETHAL bullet ENTER his BODY? It APPEARs he was SHOT from BEHIND, with BLOOD running DOWN his FACE, from the BACKside. If he was shot in the FRONT with a HIGH-caliber bullet from the SOUTH SS TEAM, his FACE would have been OBLITERATED.
2. How many SHELL CASINGs were DISCOVERED on the ROOF near Crooks' body? How many SHOTs did he TAKE? WHY was his RIFLE seen some 6 FEET AWAY from his dead BODY, and NOT RIGHT NEXT him?
3. How MANY TOTAL SHOTs were taken by SS? Did MORE than ONE SS TEAM execute said shot(s)?
3. WHERE & HOW did Crooks ACCESS that ROOF, without ANY LE or SS AWARE, after being labeled SUSpicious with PHOTO taken from 2nd FLOOR window above retaining wall, including rangefinder, backpack, and bicycle, in all tow?
4. WHO ALL was in the 2-FLOOR AGR Building? HOW on GOD's EARTH did THAT TEAM 'not' SEE Crooks CRAWLING up the ROOF, with WINDOWs OPEN, and the PUBLIC SCREAMING underneath about a man on the roof with a GUN⁉️HOW⁉️🤬Make it make SENSE.
#GODknows👁️
~ Hebrews 4:13
~ Luke 8:17
~ Exodus 14:14
🚄🎚🇺🇸🏁

[peterepoet]

This is what happens when the FBI even after 11 days has not said “We collected x number of spent cartridges on the roof where the shooter was.”

[imelusb]

You obviously don't understand professional audio shoots analysis. Different rifles, different distances and also angles of shoots are confirmed by experts. You didn't debunk anything .

[DW_drums]

Cell phone microphones are omnidirectional, and your SM7 is a cardioid polar pattern....if you dont know the difference between the two, maybe ease up on the audio analysis 😂😂😂

Question: the crowd screaming doesn't change frequency even when the phone is rotated almost 180 degrees...so why would the gun shots change?

Answer: because the cell phone was omnidirectional and captured the true(ish) frequency of all the different point sources, no matter the angle....therefore the different sounding shots were indeed different weapons

[danchanda]

1) The initial audio analysis was done using only the stationary audio feed from the mic on stage. When a secondary audio feed was introduced by Chris Martinson, he adjusted for the different location of audio #2 by matching up the audio signatures of the gunshots on each sound file. Regardless, you don't need a second audio source to determine that there were 2 and perhaps 3 different weapons being fired TOWARDS the stage. See Mike Adams' analysis of this.
2) Not that I believe there was a shooter on the water tower, but there are at least 2 individuals being interviewed at the scene saying saw and/or heard shots coming from the water tower. So yes, those claims are out there from people on the scene.

[brucestarr]

The sound picked up at the podium mic doesn't change direction and you can hear 3 different types of reports and sonic boom cracks from different firearms.

[SHsparx]

3:00 Generally when you claim you've debunked a news source about something, you might want to present evidence as to why you think they're wrong, otherwise there's no reason for me to find you credible.

[BigAlSpeaks]

The only problem with your theory Jeff is that there are multiple videos and the three shots vs five shots sound like there are two guns in each video. In fact, if you listen closely, there are two distant faint shots between the first three loud shots and the next five loud shots. No one is talking about the two "faint distant shots".

[surfrats]

You should call this the Excuse Channel.

[kaylaread]

Yesterday, for 4, 5 hours she said absolutely nothing. She said nothing because of incompetence or neglice? Hard to believe. And the pressure was massive.

[polandohio]

Consiracy was to make the shooter the fall guy. There were others involved. The FBI cleaned the roof and what happened to the gun shells?

[Lina-lqjm]

Chris Martenson addressed the camera angle theory. Plus, he presented more evidence than just a different sound to say that there were two shooters.
I'm not an expert here, but he addressed echoes (which one had, the other didn't) and other things that clearly indicate the difference between series.
Besides, Dr. Martensen used more than one audio and video (shot from different places and angles) and they align.
I'm afraid you debunked NOTHING!

[johno]

There is a new video from the 2nd floor building with the open windows and you can see where Trump was standing and you could see where the shooter was laying on the roof without sticking your head out the window.

[garyrendano]

oh please.. the mic at trumps podium didnt rotate 180 degrees as you say... total false

[JFomo]

People have been in that building today with the window. The view from the window shows the whole roof where Crooks was.

[mikewho]

You can hear there are three shots, then five shots, then a single shot from further away. The last single shot sounds like a more powerful rifle as well, has more of a boom rather than a crack and sounds like it’s further in the distance.

[coolpix]

There is a video Benny put out today that shows the room that the counter snipers were setup in. It was the mid window. They showed it could clearly see the entire roof. How could they miss that? The shooter was on the roof for minutes.

[dingickso]

No way that 20-year old kid was the real shooter. He was a patsy, probably instructed to be up there. A real shooter would not be hanging around for an hour-and-a-half, visible to lots and lots of people. The real shooter was probably in the building below him, which was a tactical training facility, probably chock full of rifles. Also seems likely (given the bullet sequences) there was also more than one shooter. 2nd shooter on the other side of building crooks was lying. Shot from a window on 2nd floor. 7 meters away. Analyzed by audio analyze (no echo for first 3 shots) followed by 5vshots from crooks with echo. A complete different sound. Calculated the distance by echo.