Trump Shooting | Audio Analysis

preview_player
Показать описание
The evidence of this sound analysis demonstrates just 2 weapons. 8 shots from Crooks and a single counter-sniper shot.
The near assassination of ex President Trump happened at 6:11PM on Jul 13, 2024 in Butler, PA.
The track of the bullet and the radiating soundwaves have been animated here for easy visualization and making sense of, overlaid over the recreated 3D environment of the on 13 Jul 2024 rally in Butler Pennsylvania north of Pittsburgh. 20 year Thomas Matthew Crooks has been named the shooter.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

@2:18 the rapid fire shots overlap each other causing a mismatch in the pattern. The reasons for this are:

1. Shot 6 has no sonic boom because it was almost certainly the shot that tragically killed Cory Comparatore. This also ties up with his family saying he was protecting them and giving him 5 seconds to try and bravely do so.

2. The gunpowder bang from shots 6 and 7 were not captured on the audio track because they overlap and arrived while the microphone was momentarily maxed out and recovering from bullet sonic booms.

Mike-Bell
Автор

So why do shots 1-3 sound differently from shots 4-8? 1-3 sound more muffled. 4-8 sound sharper and slightly louder. Shot 9, which I guess is the counter sniper's shot, does sound different, as it should.

lumiofc
Автор

You’re missing the 10th shot, it came at about 16 seconds from the first shot. The 9th shot is thought to be from the ESU sniper and the final 10th shot from the SS Sniper. I have not seen any definitive info on where the 9th and 10th shots came from. There may have been a sniper on a grand stand building 1, 030 feet SSW from Crook’s location. I’m not sure if all 8 shots came from Crooks. The government lies all the time, you can’t trust anything they tell you.

jamiehumphrey
Автор

You didn't prove only 1 shooter. Your source audio makes the shots sound similar, but shots 4-8 are completely different speed and report. Other audio analysis using stage facing videos proves a 2nd shooter. It's obvious

neonmonkey
Автор

The sound of the shots is not the important part, the time between the sound of the bullet and the rifle report indicates different distances.
That is the important part.
That is just math.
The microphone that recorded all the shots did not move so it becomes the constant in the equations.

jerryfrederick
Автор

You need to do a qualitative analysis and echo analysis of the shots from all the source microphones. Your conclusions are perhaps premature.

quietmanvp
Автор

You know the sound contractor was recording it. Use that source. That will only be the podium location and those sounds are then all being broadcast over the PA. It eliminates all the cellphone movements and inconsistencies. Unfortunately the FBLIE has that recording and it will be buried in some tomb with the Ark of the Covenent.

rxtrehy
Автор

3 different weapons were fired. First 3 shots we not from Crooks.

towhead
Автор

How about the fact that you don't mention the 10th shot several seconds after the 9th shot?... which is the actual Secret Service sniper... the 9th shot was from the ESU officer believed to be in the building behind the "shooter"...

Plus I have heard the unedited shots in multiple videos.... the 1st shot is not quite as loud as the next 2, then the next 5 have an obvious echo as the sound reverberates off of something in front of the shots... there is nothing in front of the "shooter" to cause it...

The water tower is a non topic because it is not online with anything...

My thoughts are you are lying... IMHO your edited audio proves it...

I have been around weapons my entire life... 15+ years in the military... 25+ years outside the military... I will trust my ears over an edited audio track thank you very much...

seanm
Автор

There were more than one shooter.Crooks may never have fired.Where is the photo of him dead, surrounded by casings??

dennisbailey
Автор

UCDenver National Center for Media Forensics doesn't agree with You.... 👀

BaldFury
Автор

The ESU officer was placed on administrative leave as standard practice, this came from the department. There is an official press release. SS was confirmed as the shot that took out shooter. Not much confirmed info but these were. I would like to know where the amount of shell cases there were came from.

brianlowe
Автор

Shots 4 through 8 come so fast together they're almost as fast as the world-record holder. Certainly too fast for someone with his low level of training holding a semi-auto. They came from someone well-trained, or possibly a low round-per-minute automatic.

slowbro
Автор

Great job ! Only problem is you only used sources facing the shots, so it's completely normal that variations of sound seems the same ! And the fact you slow down the sounds from the nearest source make disappear the difference between the first sequence of 3 shots and the second sequence of 5 shots ! At normal speed, the difference is notable, particulary for the recording mid distance from Trump's stage ! It would be interesting if you use other sources that are not in line with the shootings, and make calculations for triangulation... just to see if its already match ! Whith all the sources lined up, it can be intersesting !

fabricecavalier
Автор

Two questions: 1.) All 8 shots made a sonic boom. How did the shot that killed the firefighter also make a sonic boom on Trump's mic? 2.) Another analysis evidences a kinetic event from the first shot along the back row of the bleachers after missing the snipers (search John Cullen), It would be great if someone could estimate the slope of such a shot to see if it is a possibility worthy of further consideration. The kinetic event along the back row of the bleachers is compelling as it shows what appears to be a blood plume from the wounded bystander. Do you know the elevation difference from the top rail of the bleachers to the roof peak where the non-shooting sniper team was positioned?
Thank you for your analysis and your unbiased work.

ericmcwhirter
Автор

Did you say all sounds are the same? The first 3 shots do sound the same. In this video they start at: 3:32; and then go to 3:34. These are 3 very focused unwavering distinct shots; almost like a professional rifle man. Then the sounds from 3:36 to 3:37 are completely different to me. Even your slow motion distinguishes a different pitch between these sets of sounds. The last shot seems definitive. Thanks for posting these sounds. It helps me realize the different pitches.

platimontif
Автор

After two weeks it was no hard for secret service to count all shots and say they have the same amount of shells.

thorhorn
Автор

Nope. Even on your recording 1-3 are lower than 4-8. Distinct difference. Not the same.

pokey
Автор

I'm onboard, but what about shot 10 which is believed to have occurred at about 15.8 seconds after the first one?

MPhonemicEnglish
Автор

Evidence suggests more than one shooter. Although the first three shots sound similar, the first one sounds slightly muffled. The following five shots are clearly different from the first three. Watch videos from Dr. Chris Martenson or Mike Adams. They each go into depth analyzing these gunshots from different audio sources, including Trump’s mic. We don’t even know how many, if any, shots that Crooks took. Cheatle, the former director of Secret Service, wouldn’t answer the simple question as to how many shell casings were found on the roof with Crooks’ body. That last shot, as we now know, was not Secret Service but law enforcement. The Secret Service sniper shot was the very last shot, not heard on this recording. Crooks was shot twice, not once.

alexfoxx