Capitalism or Socialism: Which One Is More Democratic? | 5 Minute Video

What is the difference between free-market capitalism and democratic socialism? And which system is actually more fair and responsive to the needs of the people? Here’s a hint: names can be deceiving. Dinesh D’Souza has the answers.

FOLLOW us!

SHOP!

Script:

Why is socialism so popular?

Less than ten years ago you couldn’t refer to “socialism” in a positive way and hope to have a career in American politics.

Socialism was referred to as the “s” word.

Now it is affirmed, either explicitly or implicitly, by just about everyone on the Left.

And, amazingly, given socialism’s record of failure, the socialists seem to be gaining ground.

Why? What makes socialism so attractive to so many?

Socialism, according to its proponents, is more democratic and therefore more moral than capitalism.

Leftist filmmaker Michael Moore explains it for us.

“Democratic socialism means everyone has a seat at the table and everybody gets a slice of the pie.”

The famed socialist writer Irving Howe wrote something similar in his 1982 autobiography, “We believe that the democracy…in our political life should also be extended deeply into economic life.”

The basic idea here is that socialism is vindicated through its roots in popular consent.  If a majority of people, working through their elected representatives, declares something to be a public entitlement — say free college or free healthcare — then they are justified in extracting resources from those who create wealth to pay for it.

As Nathan Robinson argues in his book Why You Should Be a Socialist, the moral imperative is to place the economy under the control of “the people.”

Sounds good, at least superficially… until you dig a bit below the surface.

First, what direct control do “the people” really have over any government institution?  What control do the British people have over the National Health Service? What control do Americans have over the Department of Motor Vehicles or the U.S. Post Office?  The answer of course is none. Given its practical impossibility, genuine popular control over government institutions is a mirage. 

Second, what if 51 percent of Americans vote to confiscate the resources of a single person, say Bill Gates?  Does that make it right? 

Under an authoritarian socialist government, a single dictator seizes the fruits of your labor. Everyone is against that. Under democratic socialism, a majority does. The end result is the same -- you’ve been robbed.

The fundamental problem with democratic socialism, however, is its assumption that in a free market system, the economy is not under the control of the people. This is exactly the opposite of how things work.

Let me explain.

Each of us are not only citizens; we are also consumers.  These are overlapping categories: every citizen is a consumer, and every consumer is also a citizen.  The consumer, like the citizen, is a voter.  As citizens, we vote once every two or four years; as consumers, we vote many times a day.

The citizen votes with a ballot which costs him nothing, except the inconvenience of going to the polls.  The consumer votes with his money which costs him a lot — all the time and effort he put in to earn that money.

Only a fraction of citizens are eligible to vote at the ballot box, but every consumer votes in the marketplace—even felons, even children.  Illegal aliens cannot vote for political candidates, but they too vote with their money. Moreover, citizens participate in a system of representative democracy -- their views are filtered through the politicians who represent them. Consumers, by contrast, vote in a system of direct democracy.

If you prefer an Audi to a Lexus or the Apple iPhone to the Samsung Galaxy, you don’t have to elect some other guy to exercise these preferences; you do it directly yourself, by paying for them.  Here we see the secret of how those billionaires like Jeff Bezos got so rich.  We made them rich!  The inequality that socialists complain about is the result of popular mandate.  Want fewer billionaires? Stop buying their stuff!

[scholl]

“Everybody gets a slice of the pie” yea that will never happen if Michael Moore is at that table he will he eat the whole pie

[budicaesar]

“The goal of socialism is communism.”

- Vladimir Lenin

[odysseusreturns]

The most accurate and concise description of socialism was given by Winston Churchill. "Socialism is the Philosophy of Failure, The Creed of Ignorance, and the Gospel of Envy. its only virtues being the equal sharing of miseries". Seventy years later that description is still accurate.

[GuitarZombie]

I hate it when the politicians use idioms to expressing themselves really saying nothing
"Slice of the pie" "seat at the table' "soul of the nation"

[BAMBAH]

"socialism is when the government does stuff if the government do more stuff its more socialism if the government does a whole lotta stuff its communism"
-karl marx

[visitante-pczc]

Michael Moore's quote is so humane ...

but he forgets to mention who's gonna invest the time, material and machinery to bake the pie. Is someone from the table?

[mr.fresherthen_u]

“Want to have fewer billionaires ? Stop buying their stuff”

lmaoo I don’t know why I found that part hilarious

[MalcolmCooks]

"under an authoritarian socialist government, a single dictator siezes the fruits of your labour"
this already happens, he's called my boss

[varhah]

This is literally, socialism is when the government does stuff

[Vital_form]

"Just don't buy their stuff" An excellent strategy to mitigate the ever increasing wealth inequality, how is that working out for us?

[maestrulgamer]

"Consumers vote with their money, so they have all the power."
The 1% has most of the money, so in this system they have most of the power!This is oligarchy, not democracy!

[davidmargarita]

3:57 how can you stop buying billionaires stuff if it’s the only stuff on the market?

[gustafengstrom]

I mean this logic applies fine when you're talking about phones, or even going as far as the price of university studies; but it sort of falls apart when talking about apartments, medicine or other such things where you often end up in a situation where you have no choice and cannot act like an informed consumer. Instead you are free to be controlled by whoever controls the situation and therefore you. Sort of like local monopolies.

[martinszathmari]

Want to see small businesses thrive instead of big corporations like Amazon? Then stand up, go to a small business and buy from there.

[rislivestreams]

Imagine working a dead end job in Walmart and deluding yourself that your measly wage makes a difference, as if you have a say in how monopolies like google or apple do their business. LMAO.

[marcoroberts]

I’m sure this will give a completely unbiased portrayal of different ideologies- oh

[pliuworld]

Just ask countries who had tried communism: USSR, China, Vietnam, East Germany, Poland, Czech, Hungary, and more. Why did they ALL have to make adjustment towards capitalism? The communism is a self conflicting system that doesn’t generate enough wealth for people to collectively owned. It starts with hate and jealousy towards the rich, but then gets stuck in low production once moving to state owned collectively socialism.

[franklincastillo]

Stop bailing out Wall Street let them go bankrupt and increase taxes

[duttateyadalai]

Capitalism is good as long as there's competition. When it leads to monopoly, it takes away the benefits of capitalism.

[danielcuthbert]

Those major corporations who we buy from work together behind closed doors and squash small business so there is no choice