NASA Designs Near Light Speed Engine That Breaks Laws Of Physics

preview_player
Показать описание
One of humanity’s most inspiring achievements was when we first flew into space. But the entire space program would not have been possible without the existence of the rocket engine!
With interest in space travel growing every year, more and more companies are striving to develop their own technological solutions to turn this dream into a reality.
In today’s video, we are going to take a look at several different intriguing technological solutions that will have a person heading to the stars over and over in the future!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Scientists: "Our work is useless if misrepresented by the media."
Media: "Scientists Say Their Work is Useless"

ominous-omnipresent-they
Автор

The laws of physics can be redefined, but never broken.

samlewis
Автор

conclusion, again, NASA didn't designed Near Light Speed Engine

epicspaces
Автор

To summarise for anyone considering wasting their time watching this video: an incoherent rambling about the 'em drive' engine supposedly developed decades ago and the numerous tests showing no evidence of thrust, interspersed with nonsensical regurgitations of data and 'breaking the laws of physics' indicating the author has no understanding of what they're talking about, spoken over stock video clips, pictures of fictional engines and unrelated chemical rocket launch videos.

danielfearn
Автор

A vacuum chamber can not be held at "normal atmospheric pressure."

terp
Автор

Hey people i have an inertial drive concenpt. I have reviewed most prototype patents and so on. I have the concept idea why the inertial drive is failing. I am very realistic and i just want to build my prototype maybe try another failing project. But my project is using a different approach. Need a lots of electronic and engineering knowledge. Just do not care it works or not so how can i test and build it? Where can i get support?

dermankaya
Автор

I'm more interested in the development of spacecraft brakes!!

grumpyoldpig
Автор

2:25: FALSE. Paul March and team at NASA Eagleworks CONFIRMED Shawyer’s findings. As did the the Chinese, who claimed to build a test article not requiring a truncated cone.

LostAnFound
Автор

If it broke the laws of physics it wouldn't work...I prefer "they need to rewrite some of the theories in physics"

rpaul
Автор

A long time ago someone told me that space is 3 meters between hydrogen atoms. If the atoms of the solar winds are collectable something like a space jet engine could possibly be made. Collect atoms by an intake, if they are ionized already, you might be able to electromagnetically create acceleration with them. I know ion engines exist with onboard material for acceleration. But acquiring material that is already out there might be more efficient if not endless.

lancegrina
Автор

So much for the lightspeed engine besides thrust propulsion doesn't work in vacuum

christrull
Автор

So where is the "near light speed" engine? Bogus !

xp
Автор

Entire space colonization is not kidding but it is a great hope

safiullahansari
Автор

What was not discussed was the performance of these engines in terms of speeds and time etc ?

tonyreid
Автор

Bob Lazzar reverse engineered downed alien craft, all of this is obsolete already.

dariusmccormack
Автор

The idea that this could work, would be like trying to lift a chair while sitting in it!

alfredtrerotola
Автор

We should change NASA's name to Yeah Right!

strannix
Автор

Fastest we can ever get, Light Speed is scientifically and physically impossible

SpaceDudeCosmo
Автор

Been watching a lot of "Light Speed Engine"/"Warp Drive" for the last 6 months and honestly thinking about going back to school for this.

KENPACHIK
Автор

"that breaks laws of physics"
imma just...
X to doubt

rubythacker