How to use Method of Joints (Truss Analysis Example)

preview_player
Показать описание
Learn how to solve trusses using method of joints in this truss analysis example problem.

The method of joints is an analytical method used to determine the forces of each member in a truss. The method is built on the fact that if an entire truss is in equilibrium, then each of its joints are also in equilibrium. It follows that a free body diagram can be drawn for the joints in a truss and analysed using force equilibrium equations on the member forces acting on each joint.

Music by Adrian von Ziegler
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

thank you for the simplicity and conciseness. very helpful!

devengoinden
Автор

Honestly amazing, this video was a lifesaver for me! Thanks so much for uploading this, covered a concept I've been struggling with & binging countless videos on with ease

mae
Автор

very helpful🤛🤛🤜🤜

Please can you tell me the textbook i can use to study more on this type of questions

KolawoleMoses-olsp
Автор

Calculation is wrong. Following Sohcahtoa role in horizontal direction sum F = 500N + FBC cos (45). This because cos45 = adj / hyp = 500/FBC.

sarwarn
Автор

Sin is for vertical component
Cos is for horizontal component

anti-poverty
Автор

I have the same question as taught but the diagram in the mirror position can I answer as taught or can't change the position

fazriefaiz
Автор

Thank you so much you really helped me!!!

fifaz
Автор

Wow nice.. its an extreme fundamentals it will help..thank you.

markjeffreyederango
Автор

There's one thing I'm confused about and can't seem to find addressed anywhere. Around 2:12 you explain that if your calculation comes back negative, then you made the wrong assumption. But how does the assumption affect the setup? How do you know what sign corresponds to the assumption you've made about tension or compression when you first set up the equilibrium expression? Maybe a dumb question but I seriously can't figure it out

diemdia
Автор

I have a question @Cowan Academy, when you took Fbc direction toward B then at C shouldn't the force be going away from C towards B.
Hoping for a reply.

abdulhanan-vlst
Автор

why did he choose fbc instead of fba in the beginning for Fx?

daman
Автор

tnx and also buddy which softwere is you using iin this video for solving the problem

zarnoshktk
Автор

I am confused at 4:55 you didn't put negative sign with value of F_ bc

INAMmathematicivilengineering
Автор

Why did he say 500+F_BC*sin(45) at 1:23 and not 500+F_BC*cos(v)? Why use sin and not cos?

donmk
Автор

i was hoping there will be examples on more complex ones

okeniyiayoola
Автор

This still makes ZERO sense, but It gave me something to attempt at lol

luketanker